Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi,


I was wondering of someone could give me some advice about baby monitors....

I am utterly baffled as to which one to get. Is it worth spending a bit of money and getting an all signing all dancing one with video or should I just go for a basic model - or something in between?!


Also is it something you need to get from birth (as our baby will be in our room for the first couple of weeks/months) or should I wait until the baby is born?


Any advice much appreciated!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/14212-baby-monitor-confusion/
Share on other sites

We've got the BT 150 monitor (?58.50 from amazon) and have found it to be brilliant. It has adjustable sensitivity, a torch in the parent unit, a nightlight and temperature gauge built into the baby unit and it plays lullabies too (which I found v useful in the v early weeks during nappy / clothes changes). We've had it since the birth of our baby and in those early weeks I found it useful to communicate with my partner from the bedroom to request cups of tea / food etc while I was resting in bed or feeding baby and although our daughter is still in our room (she's 5 months now) we use it every night when she is in bed before us. I've found it v reliable, great signal, v clear sounds quality and dead easy to use.


I know several people who don't have monitors at all though - I suppose it depends on the size and layout of your home and how much you want to listen in on your baby as he/she sleeps.

And another one for the BT 150 and definitely get it before yours is born...although our daughter stayed in our bedroom til 10 weeks you may still need it in the day if she is sleeping and you are out the room and also if you manage to get out to friends houses for drinks etc and want to put her in a moses basket in a room etc....

Video all the way. If you are a paranoid type like me a quick look to see that little chest rising works wonders without you bursting in and waking the little one.


It does of course, depend on what sort of house you have! Also my vidmmonitor did get interference from my wireless router!

Hi, we're thinking of buying a video monitor. There are two Summer ones on the market: the secure sleep one and, what looks like a newer one, the baby zoom. The only difference I can make out from the mothercare brochure is that the former has a room temparature gauge. Is there one particular model that users would recommend?

We have the Angel Care Sound Monitor (just the sound one, not the one that has the movement detector) and have had no problems with it whatsoever. It has adjustable sensitivity so you can have it set to pick up all noise or, as I do, the setting below that where it jsut picks up shouts, crying, yelps, etc, but not little sleepy noises or mutterings. It has a nightlight (which we don't use) and a temperature guage which is the thing I find the most useful so that I don't sit panicking about whether he's too hot / too cold. It also has a long range which I'm hoping will come in handy next Spring / Summer when we take to eating outside again!


To be honest though, they can be addictive and stop you from relaxing. You definitely need one, don't get me wrong, and in the early days you'll have it on but probably still go in to check (I know I did when he started going to be before us), but as time has gone on I've started trusting my own hearing a bit more (he's 11 weeks now). I don't need to hear every little noise as it makes me jump with a start each time - I just need to know if he needs me which is usually made loud and clear with a big shout or cry which I can hear without the monitor.

Uptime - We've got the Summer Baby Zoom Digital Video Monitor which is brilliant. There isn't a temperature gauge but we have a Gro egg for that. I think there's a newer, slimline version of the monitor, but we're quite happy with the zoom one. Really easy to operate, great sound and picture.
We've got a video monitor, it was great in the early days especially as she spent some time in special care and I was a bit neurotic to start with :). Now she's 6 months I'll be using it to keep an eye on her in her playpen while I'm dashing around the house trying to get stuff done (I can always dream!)

I can totally understand why people want the vid monitor, having been the type of dad that would stand by the cot for ages making sure baby was still alive.


However, I can't help thinking that we are moving towards hooking babies up to full on life support monitors in the not too distant future!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...