Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We have the option to fly to Central America with either Continental or American Airlines in January, the prices are similar but we're wondering if anyone has any experience with either of these?


There was the option to fly with BA but they might be affected by industrial action in January and so they're a no go.


Thanks in advance

I flew to Rio via Houston with Continental back in 2003. I think all Continental flights route via Houston which can add hours onto your journey, partly due to inefficient transit processes. I don't recall it being one of the best airports to wait around in either.


As for the flight, the plane was quite empty so we had plenty of space to stretch out, but I wouldn't recommend them particularly. If we hadn't had the additional space it would've been quite uncomfortable. Also remember we had to pay for our in-flight drinks and the stewardess serving us decided to impose a slightly bizarre 2 drink limit, although it was done with a lot of Southern charm.


I've not flown American but a friend of mine is joining me in NY this week and flying with AA.

I'll be happy to post up his experience, if you wish.

My all time worst flight was with American. We'd gone with them because we could get business for the same price as standard on BA.


What an absolute disaster.


Shabby planes, dogeared seats and a non-functioning entertainment system.


I understand that Continental and American were in merger talks, so there may not be much between them. I do understand that Continental operate a much younger fleet though, which might make difference as to whether you feel like you're in a flying shed.


If there is a two drink rule, that would be reason enough for rejecting anyone on a long haul flight.

Similar experience, Miami to Guatemala City on American.

Plane was ancient, once onn plane an hours delay due to technical difficulties. I was terrified the whole journey we'd drop out the sky.

Seats were worn thin, burly and rude air hosts threw a pack of peanuts at me and there was no booze.


Will avoid AA in future if I can.


Guatemala's national carrier only has brand new airbuses and staff polite and friendly; if you have the option....

We recently flew AA to Chicago and it was ok. Oldish Boing 777 but legroom was fine. We were delayed about 1 1/2 hrs leaving but had quite a long stopover in Chicago so it didnt really matter. Couldnt believe how old the flight crew (think Grecian 2000 advert) and stewards all seemed - older than us and we feel ancient (but they were mostly quite jolly (I am used to flying Alitalia/Air France where everyone is much younger..) You can get booze - but it is USD 6 for a can of beer!! Soft drinks are free.
Thank you everyone. I did fly to Mexico with American Airlines last year and they were a bit poor, the hostesses were like ageing Sue Ellens from Dallas who liked to chat/shout to each other across the trolley and my video screen was missing the green element. Continental is looking preferable at the moment.

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> the hostesses were like ageing Sue Ellens

> from Dallas who liked to chat/shout to each other

> across the trolley.


This reminds me of every Air Canada flight I've ever taken. Rude and grumpy like comedy dinner ladies. And all done with BIG HAIR.


All US carriers have a decent rep for maintenance but are amongst the worst for in flight trimmings and passenger experience. So for me I'd choose BA or TAM over those two unless budget is tight.

Have flown Continental to Guatemala via Houston (3 years ago) without any problems - certainly none in transit at Houston - and have used both airlines on east coast transatlantic flights over past few years. I think both airlines charge for drinks now and poor in flight service seems to be prevalent on US based airlines (probably as most have been in bankruptcy in recent years, there is not a lot of staff morale).


If there is little to decide in price, I would opt for the airline that can offer the most convenient timings/shortest overall travel time.

It's a flight to Costa Rica, Continental flights all seem to fly via Newark and none of them say operated by Virgin, which is a shame. We did initially look to see where Virgin fly so we could consider a flight with them but they don't do Central America.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My all time worst flight was with American. We'd

> gone with them because we could get business for

> the same price as standard on BA.

>

> What an absolute disaster.

>

> Shabby planes, dogeared seats and a

> non-functioning entertainment system.

>

> I understand that Continental and American were in

> merger talks, so there may not be much between

> them. I do understand that Continental operate a

> much younger fleet though, which might make

> difference as to whether you feel like you're in a

> flying shed.

>

> If there is a two drink rule, that would be reason

> enough for rejecting anyone on a long haul flight.

-------------------------------------------------------


So the AA have a two drink rule these days, shocking!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But all those examples sell a wide variety of things,  and mostly they are well spread out along Lordship Lane. These two shops both sell one very specific thing, albeit in different flavours, and are just across the road from each other. I don't think you can compare the distribution of shops in Roman times to the distribution of shops in Lordship Lane in the twenty first century. Well, you can, but it doesn't feel very appropriate. Haa anybody asked the first shop how they feel? Are they happy about the "healthy competition" ?
    • ED is included in the 17 August closure set (or just possibly 15 August, depending on which part of the page you trust more) listed at https://metro.co.uk/2025/07/25/full-list-25-poundland-stores-confirmed-close-august-23753048/. Here incidentally are some snippets from their annual reports, at https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/02495645/filing-history. 2022: " during the period we opened 41 stores and closed 43 loss-making/under-performing stores.  At the period-end we were trading from 821 stores in the UK, IoM and ROI. ... "We renogotiated 82 leases in the year, saving on average 45% versus the prior lease agreement..." 2023: "We also continued to improve our market footprint through sourcing better store locations, opening 53 and closing 51 stores during the year." 2024:  "The ex-Wilco stores acquired in the prior year have formed a core part of this strategy to expand our store network.  We favour quality over quantity and during the period we opened 84 stores and closed 71 loss-making/under-performing ones."
    • Ha! After I posted this, I thought of lots more examples. Screwfix and the hardware store? Mrs Robinson and Jumping Bean? Chemists, plant shops, hairdressers...  the list goes on... it's good to have healthy competition  Ooooh! Two cheese shops
    • You've got a point.  Thinking Leyland and Screwfix too but this felt different.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...