Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I will openly apologise for the name calling (tosser) - I was out of order for that.


H's intent is to wind me up though.....of course he won't admit that but he does wind poeple up...I've had pm's from people telling me what they think of him on several occasions, so I do base my opinion on some form of evidence. He does have a condascending wrting style and tone of phrase (which isn't necesary to make a point or express a view).


As for the nonsense that this thread is all about me, if that's not some personal obsession/ vendetta (call it what you like) then what is.....I barely commented in this thread after starting it anyway and to even think it was started for any reason deeper than a bit of spur of the moment fun is also deeply ridiculous.


Why is he putting so much effort in finding some kind of deep psychological reason for me starting a thread about a sex toy? Because he's intent on making something out of nothing...he should just let it go and agree to disagree.


Anyway I'm not rising to bait anymore, got better things to do, so will put him on hide....and get back to having fun banter with those that understand what fun is.....

Hugo - you started it by calling me a man hater:


"When they get the reaction, they launch into a man-hating rant. First IV with some scarcely concealed misandry about climaxing, and then DJKQ tossing subtelty out of the window",


so I made a joke about your inability to satisfy your wife.


No biggie, so stop getting all huffy and get yourself a large G&T or prozac!

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> That's what you say! Let's see the evidence.


Disclosing the contents of personal messages defeats the object of sending them, surely? I'm sure if DJ did do this, people would get even more upset. If admin REALLY wanted to they could look in the database to confirm it. They wont because they have better things to do.


EDIT: I've just realised this might come across as looking a bit like damage control on my part, so just to pre-empt any thoughts along those lines, I'm not worried about any PM's I may have sent anyone regarding this thread - feel free to disclose away!

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Low batteries

>

>

> That is the best line so far LOL.....:))




I'm not sure low batteries is a laughing matter. Not at this time of night.

Just like to point out, its not only men that are paedos. If people didnt like the candid way this thread appears,

why did they continue to read it.?Its the way of the world.

But i hope no children reading will want one for Christmas.

But no matter what you are getting up close and personal with,keep it clean, even naughty little rabbits carry germs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
    • https://www.letslinkuk.net/ I'm interested to know why the OP didn't find this sort of scheme to work, as I would have thought it was much harder to find someone to do a direct exchange with? Does anybody else have experience of a scheme like this? Happy to be persuaded! 
    • I personally think is a great idea Bobbly and would love if there was a section for it. I wouldn't offer free gardening under the "for sale" section as I would expect something in exchange and wouldn't expect our cat being looked after for free under the "wanted" section, as an example.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...