Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello,


Given that this is a site used by all members of the community in East Dulwich, I was disappointed to see you describe my home as an "ugly block" and to see that you hope it will be "demolished soon". Perhaps you assume that all users of this site will be ABC123 aesthetes who would only consider living in a victorian property.


I agree; it is not, intrinsically, a particularly attractive building and has been shockingly neglected by our wilfully obstructive and incompetent Head Leaseholders with whom we are now engaged in ongoing legal disputes to have the building repaired and renovated.


However, the flats themselves far more spacious than any of the extortionately over-priced period conversions in the area and, for that reason, pleasurable to live in.


I understand that people become a bit trigger-happy on these sites but please try to be more sensitive to others and constructive in the future. I really can't see the point of the site if it is merely to be a forum for inflammatory and nefarious speculation and blunderingly composed invective.

Oh tush people. I'm well into middle age and happily espouse internet banking. Far more convenient (esp with the onset ofarthritis). What I don't hold with is these new-fangled sandwiches. Tuna and sweetcorn? What's wrong with spam?

"Here we go again! Another thread goes the way of "new vs old". Can't we just let it lie for once?!" can i second that motion and add that i have been priced out of my area in london to here and i just hope that people priced out of here are not treated the same way as 'newbies' are here.


back to thread:


i don't like mark one, would much rather have a primark, or even better a uniqlo. i love cheap clothes shops, just not mark one. there are many better ones. however, i agree, being that there is one in peckham doubt they'll open here.

Sorry, that block's is a blot on the ED landscape. I'm sure they're lovely and spacious inside, but it's a depressing eyesore. As bad as the police station. And I'm not wishing for a chintzy Victorian pastiche in its place, as that would be worse. I'd just like to see a well-thought out, well-designed, modern arcade like the one containing Sainsbury's in Forest Hill.

kford,


Yes that's fine, I'm not disputing that you're entitled to your opinion - I'm just saying that blithely denigrating my home on an interactive community website didn't seem to be in the spirit of the thing. Clearly the design of the building isn't ideal but it isn't going to be knocked down and it seems a bit futile to speculate on what you would have liked them to have built in its place 40 years ago, and indeed offensive to speculate on what you would like to be built if they did knock my home down. Appreciation of design is, of course, subjective and in turn I can't say that I admire the aesthetic of the Forest Hill Sainsburys development either; I certainly won't be suggesting that it should be demolished though. If you're particularly worried about planning issues then it would be nice to think you could turn your considerable energies to constructive lobbying of Southwark Council's planning department for future developments.


There is tremendous scope in this area for a fantastic campaign to - for instance - ensure the survival of our small, independent businesses and it would be thrilling to think of people writing in their hundreds if not thousands to the Council, to the papers and to their MP to try to push for a sensitive town planning strategy to be put in place for this area.


But I can't see how this can be put into action if you are content to indulge in specious and insulting chat. By all means have your opinions but it's thoughtless and counterproductive to hurl them into cyberspace with little or no consideration for the feelings of others.

Marmalade, I'm not insulting your home, I'm offering a critique of the building it's located in. Don't take it so personally, it's just bricks and mortar. And I am entitled, on this site, to offer an opinion on anything in East Dulwich with affects my living here. And that block - which includes the Victorian shop that houses Winkworth, the 70s unit that houses Budgens and the windowless substation on Northcross Road - is not something I like.

Ah but Admin I think I am on topic.


like a postmodern film where you have to join the dots, you may find the answer yourself and then Eureka.


If the folks of ED are screaming for Organic, Free-trade and an end to harmoginous high streets, but in reality maybe do not understand the fundamentals then surely we have a problem? If we take taste as one example if you do not know why the UK is the home of crap Tuna, then surely you are just buying into a marketing exercise when it comes to organic, hand reared, grass fed food ?


And when this marketing exercise reaches it full potential will our high streets be any different from the harmoginous versions that people on this blog rail against now? These big companies came into being because, not equipped with sufficient knowledge, we all bought into them in the 80's.


So surely it's about informed decision making to avoid the mistakes of the past?


(although 3 pints of Kroneberg and then this badly punctuated attempt at theory is probably a mistake !)


Hoping for something different to arrive in ED in it current phase is like hoping that Lordship Lane can single handedly roll back the mechanics of Capitalism

AllforNun Wrote:


> (although 3 pints of Kroneberg and then this badly

> punctuated attempt at theory is probably a mistake

> !)



You said it.


Personally, and you seem to be getting personal with your continued references to my taste in sandwiches (no, I don't use tinned thanks) You don't even know me, so don't be such a presumptous f**king arsehole.

As for the old Woolwich site I'd prefer a record store/guitar shop but I guess that isn't about to happen.


As for your taste in beer, Kronenberg..LOL

AllforNun Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So if you don't use tinned what do you use ? Fresh

> Tuna from the Thames?


Look this is a thread about the old Woolwich Bank site is it not? Let's keep it that way. If you want to write about your so-called expertise on fish go ahead and start your own thread. Actually, I think you'll find there is already a thread about fish so go and rant on there if you so desire. Why you get so hung up about my sandwich filling is beyond me. Enough of this bollocks I say and let the rest of the people who want to talk about the Woolwich bank site continue to do so.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That is the similar issue with Peckham Rye - the council have prioritised commercial interests over the community (residents and environment), and utterly shameless in doing so. For a council to be wilfully cirumventing legal ruling, is more than alarming. Their actions should always be transparent and beyond reproach, not shady and biased for particular commercial interest. It raises the question of where else they manipulate commercial interests and generally look to break rules.    
    • I can't see it will ever be finally resolved, unfortunately. Although the local problems were made much worse due to the move of the Sylvester Road  delivery office to Peckham, Royal Mail has had issues ever since it was privatised. Whenever the local MP gets involved, things get a bit better temporarily, then they just deteriorate again. I hope I'm wrong, but there are similar postal delivery issues all over the country. I think there are currently discussions ongoing to change the delivery requirements which Royal Mail is supposed to adhere to for first and second class post. Silly question, but are you actually expecting letters? I haven't had any post for ages either, but I'm not expecting any! Much stuff these days is done by email or on apps. The East Dulwich delivery office is in Peckham, not West Dulwich?
    • Hi, over the last few years, I have had a problems with my joint freeholder. For the last 15 years there has been roof leaks and we had some repairs done around 2016 but I got another leak a few years ago. Instead of investing money in a new roof or RICS survey, the joint freeholder is trying to force me to pay for non-essential work in hallway (tiling, new door and repainting) which will come to approximately £3K via Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenants Act 1985. We keep going around in circles and I want to suggest a mediator again (ideally with a property solicitor). Key reason I am wanting to work with a lawyer is my joint freeholder is also solicitor, so needs to be someone who has expertise of leases. I have proposed a managing agent for maintenance for the building or a declaration of trust but they wont agree, so we are unable to move forward. We are just two flats in one house and trust has completely broken down. I think they are trying to make life so difficult that I sell, so they can do an extension. I love my flat and I am not in a situation where I can move. Can anyone suggest a mediator that can help us find some common ground? Any advice welcome and DM if you prefer. 
    • This problem has been going on since before Covid due to the closure of the Dulwich sorting office. The local MP Ellie Reeves is aware and has written to the Post Office. They give the same generic responses about 'temporary' staffing issues. Would encourage people to email Ellie Reeves. It's about time this was finally resolved!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...