Jump to content

Recommended Posts

oilworker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac - You are either a bit dim or simply

> being obtuse. Politicians come out with this sort

> of thing because they think it will make them

> appear more in touch with the "common man" or more

> clever for having risen from humble beginnings etc

> etc


"A bit dim"....how very dare you.

daizie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have far more respect and interest in people who

> have come from nothing and made good, than anyone

> who had a financially or otherwise privileged

> start.

>

> However I cant stand the people who forget where

> they came from and turn into a snob .



Totally agree with you on that one..nothing worse then a working class snob!.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What exactly consitutes a working class snob?


someone who serves panna cotta for dessert instead of angel delight?

decants a bottle of bulgarian red ?


oh, you must know what is meant by this, seriously. Its someone who acts like a tw@t as soon as they come into a bit of money and proceed to look down on people they were previously in the same boat as (no shame there either).


Not saying that they have to act all grateful and constantly be thankful for being 'working class done good' but there's definitely a type of person out there who can be more grating than your 'traditional' snob. No?


Thankfully, they're in the minority in my experience. The most amazing, intelligent people I have ever met in my life have worked their way up from nothing. But that's not to say that there aren't fantastic people out there who were born into a very privileged background either.


spot on, daizie.

Well, I went to both....a boarding school until late into the third form and then back into the surreal world of Tulse Hill.


I found I was, perhaps, two years ahead academically, which made it kind of boring and it was easy to just drift along.


It took a kick in the pants from a particularly inspirational teacher.


The ability to coast did not exist in my boarding school.


Although able to I never put either of my daughters through private school and both excelled in the local comprehensive.


But then Thomas Haryde's, luckily is an exceptionally good example of that type of institution.


By a country mile I preferred Tulse Hill to my boarding school....and my most enduring friendships come from my time there.


There is far more than education to be considered and the social diversity and great negotiating skills I developed to survive have stood me in better stead than my University degrees.

It is a minefield of adopting the correct decorum (or not) at the appropriate times so as to not be seen as 'chippy' by the middle classes or a working class snob by the working classes. And all the time whether you are adopting the correct decorum or not is judged by continually shifting, entirely subjective and often defensive audience. Oh, the woes, the woes. At least I dont have to eat Findus Crispy Pancakes any more though.

I remember you saying Jah


I agree for 95 per cent it was either Hell or hi jinx's


I just picked out the bits I needed and used them to my advantage


I stand by my claim that it honed my skills as a negotiator and made you able to think and act quickly


Deconflicting situations around the world was buit on those learned skills

felt-tip Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so is a working class snob worse than a middle

> class snob?


Shouldn't be.


There are other kinds of snob too.


Intellectual snobs, for example, who regard anyone less intellectually endowed as a fool and idiot undeserving of human communication.


Or infamy snobs, who once they achieve fame/infamy, will only converse with those benefiting(?) from a similar rating in the fame/infamy stakes. The ones who won't interact with [Lix Hurley's term] 'civilians' (even when it is in their interests to do so).

In response to Mic Mac,


I think if it's relevant to the discussion then sometimes it's more honest to state where you are coming from (socio-economically that is), it's undoubtedly going to shape who you are and the perceptions you make, snobberies you may have (inverted or otherwise). I prefer people not to use it to justify why they think the cycle of poverty shouldn't be broken by Govt intervention, it makes me think of that whole "I'm alright Jack" Thatcherite thing... but it's true that we do have to take responsibility for ourselves and we've seen a lot of abuse of the state in recent years, so I also see why people use it like that sometimes. It can also mean you've worked your way out of poverty, which is something to be proud of.


It's obviously not relevant to say "I grew up on a council estate" if you're having a conversation about the weather, unless perhaps they get worse weather on council estates these days....


I grew up on a council estate by the way, I only mention this because there was a girl on the estate called Angelique who also kept a donkey in her flat, until the council came and took it away (animal cruelty). The weirdest thing was seeing the Donkey's face through the net curtains.

My nephew did his work experience with the couoncil housing maintenace dept in Norfolk 3 years ago.

Some tenants still kept their poultry in the house,he only lasted 3 days , but it was an eye opener- maybe it he had lasted the 2 weeks he might have met a donkey too?

It can also be used to say that Guys from a disadvantaged, tough background made it "against the odds" and so they are, naturally imo not so likely to be taken in by the argument/theory that disadvantage has to be mean failure in later life.


The attitude being if "we" all kept out of trouble and lived "decent" lives coming from large Estates then so can "others" before and after them if they have the desire and passion and abilty to do it and want to change their situation.

There will always be people who, no matter their environment, will excel. Likewise, there will always be people that fail in life no matter what opportunities are provided for them. However, these people are extreme cases, at opposite ends of the scale. Most people are not complete winners or complete losers but the average Jo in the middle. And for that majority, a good education and upbringing is a key factor for social mobility and later success. Average Jo from Dulwich Village with average intelligence/motivation can have Mummy and Daddy buy him a good education, whereas average Jo from Peckham can't.


I read an article somewhere in the news this week about the government's recent review on poverty and life chances. It found that the life outcome of a child can be predicted by their ability level at five years of age. Five. It also found that children who start in the bottom ability range tended to stay there. The same article quoted someone from Save The Children who said that even at 19 months old, poor children start falling behind their richer friends in development. So unless we break the cycle of poor people only having access to poor education (or parenting?), I think that for the majority of babies who are born into poorer families, social mobility is a bit of a joke. For the majority that is. The exceptionally bright or motivated can always find ways to succeed.


EDIT: So I think anyone who was brought up on a council estate and has carved out a more comfortable life for themselves and is making a statement about how much they've achieved is entitled to do it and I wouldn't begrudge them that right.

I agree with binary_star. Spot on.


My school had a policy, they taught us not to give in to harmful "self fulfilling prophecies" which I think was very helpful in a lot of ways. It was a tough and struggling school in what was a poor area of Hackney at that time, a lot of kids were left on the waste heap, for lots of different reasons but poverty was the prevailing factor.


My mum always wanted me to go to Uni, she saw it as my "way out," so I had that and the financial support of both parents, which enabled me to stay in full time education until I was 18. Without both and a full grant, I wouldn't have dreamt of going. Only 10 or so kids in my year went, the school didn't even have a sixth form. Arriving at Uni with all those other kids from a diverse range of economic backgrounds - not many poor ones although it soon became apparent that everyone had their struggles - was the single most intimidating experience of my life but I adapted pretty quickly, after reminding myself that I did belong there.


I'm finding this discussion really illuminating.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Oh yes, it could have been about there, I can't remember exactly. At one point there seemed to be a load of pizza places opening on NCR. I vaguely remember the one we used to use was put out of business by another one which opened. Wasn't Grace and Favour's food offering more of a tea shop at the back of the actual shop? If memory serves the owner, whose name escapes me now, was one of the earliest people I know to move to Hastings. Which must now be crammed with South East Londoners 🤣
    • That Neal Street veggie cafe was great. Food For Thought ❤️
    • Hi Dogkennelhillbilly, You won't be aware that i proposed infill sites for housing in East Dulwich - the garages on Bassano Street and Henslowe that respectively became 1-4 Dill Terrace family houses and the 78, 80, 80A Henslowe Street family houses. These were council owned garages and it was frustrating how slow the council was to go from my idea to completion (roughly eight years). East Dulwich has some other vacant WW2 bomb sites I'm guessing that the private land owners have been sitting on.Owe for a land tax for vacant land.  WRT to the builders yard by East dulwich station. Southwark Council has an agreed policy the area should remain suburban 2/3 storeys maximum. But the approved scheme is 9 storeys of student accommodation. Very hard to put this genie back in the bottle. The council has recently publicly stated lower ratios of social housing will be required. I will be amazed if the developer doesn't submit another application now they have the 9 storeys approved but with significantly less social housing. The less social housing the higher the land values. The higher the land values the less social housing viability reports state are possible.  If we really want to increase home supply - Southwark have over 6,000 empty homes. Vancouver charges a low % of the value of empty homes and rapidly eased this problem. Parts of Wales have introduced under Article 4 planning permission is required for second homes seeing within 12 months a dramatic decrease in property prices. Southwark Council have Article 4 requirements - why not add this one? It takes National political will to solve this AND regional and local authorities such as the second home council tax premium and these being used promptly. 
    • https://www.letslinkuk.net/ I'm interested to know why the OP didn't find this sort of scheme to work, as I would have thought it was much harder to find someone to do a direct exchange with? Does anybody else have experience of a scheme like this? Happy to be persuaded! 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...