Jump to content

Recommended Posts

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship 516 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > uncleglen Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > The Britain I know & am very comfortable with

> does

> > not exist in NI.

>

> Don't get too comfortable because the SNP have

> stoked up huge amount of animosity amongst the

> Scots working class (or non-working class))

> against England in the last few years for their

> own political gain. Very sad really in my view as

> someone with Scottish interests.

what is this- I didn't write that first bit...I've worked with many from Northern Ireland both catholic and protestant and they were all very 'British'...although I could never understand their relaxed attitude to consuming large amounts of alcohol, even though my granny was Irish

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship 516 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > She has apologized many many times to the

> > conservatives but she has yet to apologize to

> the

> > electorate for her shambles...

>

> You want her to apologise to the electorate for

> them not voting for her enough to give her a

> majority? She got more votes than Corbyn - does

> he have to apologise as well?

>

> You have a really weird viewpoint of the world.


I assume Lordship means, and I agree, that she should apologise for calling an entirely unnecessary general election (what do these things cost, by the way? I bet it's some quite horrendous sum) which has left the political system and the Brexit process in chaos, simply because she wanted a) to boost her own ego by becoming an elected rather than unelected prime minister and b) to grab power for another five years instead of the three she had left and guard against losing in 2020 should Brexit go wrong. Well deserving of an apology I'd say.


ETA The election will have cost around ?150M, including, extraordinarily, ?9M given to MPs who've lost their seats as "winding up expenses." Certainly winds me up!

rendelharris Wrote:


> Well deserving of an apology I'd say.

>

> ETA The election will have cost around ?150M,

> including, extraordinarily, ?9M given to MPs

> who've lost their seats as "winding up expenses."

> Certainly winds me up!



Absolutely. Appalling waste of money. And of course the election was called with the aim of promoting TM's stance on Brexit which is specifically designed to kipper the economy and consequently put the funding of public services at risk.


I still don't get when the Tories became the party of messing up the finances. The only selling point they've had in my lifetime was the argument that they promoted business and industry, thus creating wealth that would benefit all. I can't say I'm convinced by the 'trickle down' argument - but it was all they had, and now they've ditched it.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can anyone remember what the final EDF election

> poll figures were? From memory around 61% of

> EDFers were intending to vote Labour, but in the

> GE is was over 69%. Just wondering how

> representative the EDF is of the area...

> http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/politics/constituencies/

> E14000673


I think it was more like 64% with Conservative 21%.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lordship 516 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > She has apologized many many times to the

> > conservatives but she has yet to apologize to

> the

> > electorate for her shambles...

>

> You want her to apologise to the electorate for

> them not voting for her enough to give her a

> majority? She got more votes than Corbyn - does

> he have to apologise as well?

>

> You have a really weird viewpoint of the world.


My point is very simple:


'May is still only working for the Conservative party interests'


In all her communications she appears only to care about the damage to the conservative party & her own ego & cares little about the damage she has wrought on the country.


She has expressed great sympathy for MPs losing their seats & income and says she will help them but she has no compunction in taking badly needed income from the poor, the sick, the disabled & the old. At the same time she distributes tax relief largesse to her crony supporters & sits on her hands and does very little to collect a reasonable amount of tax from Starbucks, Facebook,Microsoft, Google, Amazon etc. The argument that they would take flight is not valid - they would stay because they have a lucrative market here even if they paid more tax.


Let the newly unemployed MP take a hike down to the nearest Job Centre Plus & ask for their entitlements just like every other citizen & offer to retrain for a viable job - the expert staff will give them good advice & enrol them in great training programs that will enable them to get a good job - there are lots of jobs available or so she says; if they have a cashflow problem in waiting for their Universal Credit to kick in they then let them go to the food bank; if they don't know where it is, just ask a nurse who is short of cash or a policeman who has been sacked - they will let them know how the system works.


This person is an ogre of the highest Thatcherite order.


As usual, you are quoting selectively out of context - that is your way of projecting your contorted view to the world, which of course, is your right..

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "This person is an ogre of the highest Thatcherite

> order."

>

> So TM should apologise to you for having the

> temerity to hold different political beliefs?

>

> Not very persuasive.


It is a statement - not an argument.


She can hold any view she wishes, but now it is the whole country that is suffering from her views.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 'TM's stance on Brexit which is specifically

> designed to kipper the economy...'

>

> Could you explain to us why she wants to destroy

> the economy? Is she a KGB agent?


What fun it would be if she were! No - more prosaic than that. Simply not strong or principled enough to keep the economic interests of the country as her first priority whilst mounting a rearguard action against the right wing of her own party. John Major managed it - and he's not exactly Winston Churchill - so there's really no excuse that neither she or Cameron could.


The 'specifically designed' is facetious on my part, of course. But it's supposed to highlight the fact that the policy was in no way 'designed' to achieve anything, except keep the UKIP wing of the Tories happy.

"It is a statement - not an argument."


That's an interesting distinction. So if I said "Lordship 516 demonstrates a shaky grasp on political and economic reality, and his/her prose style also leaves a lot to be desired", a view with which you would presumably disagree, an appropriate response from me would be "It's a statement, not an argument"?

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "It is a statement - not an argument."

>

> That's an interesting distinction. So if I said

> "Lordship 516 demonstrates a shaky grasp on

> political and economic reality, and his/her prose

> style also leaves a lot to be desired", a view

> with which you would presumably disagree, an

> appropriate response from me would be "It's a

> statement, not an argument"?


Your opinion is always valid for you.


Let's see where the political & economic realities land in the months to come.

"Your opinion is always valid for you."


But I recognise that that is exactly what it is - an opinion. And I'm willing to discuss it, and who knows, I might even be persuaded that it should change.


Millions of people just voted for the Tories, and they are the largest party in the Commons. But to you, those people are 'wrong', because TM (like Thatcher before her) is an 'ogre'. Which is a statement. So there. It's not just valid, it's right. And by the way, Irish people can't be British.


As I said, not very persuasive. And not very impressive.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Corbs on the other hand is a lifelong campaigner

> and was

> > totally in his element.

>

> *After* he relented and did some media training.

>

>

> The man is a walking advertisement for some

> consultancy somewhere - they did a remarkable job.



I don't think that's true.


I heard him speak just after (literally just after) he had been put under pressure all afternoon by Labour MPs who wanted him to stand down as leader.


He was totally inspiring.


That was months and months ago.


The only reason anybody would think otherwise was because of biased media coverage.


I doubt very much any consultancy has been involved. He didn't need it.

DaveR Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "Your opinion is always valid for you."

>

> But I recognise that that is exactly what it is -

> an opinion. And I'm willing to discuss it, and

> who knows, I might even be persuaded that it

> should change.

>

> Millions of people just voted for the Tories, and

> they are the largest party in the Commons. But to

> you, those people are 'wrong', because TM (like

> Thatcher before her) is an 'ogre'. Which is a

> statement. So there. It's not just valid, it's

> right. And by the way, Irish people can't be

> British.

>

> As I said, not very persuasive. And not very

> impressive.


You jump to too many conclusions. To me Tory voters are not 'wrong' per se - I never made any statement that the Tory voters were wrong; it is their democratic right to cast their vote as they wish - I do regard that in my opinion they are misguided. It is my opinion that May & Thatcher are/were selfish unfeeling ogres obsessed with their own persona and power. You are conflating your own thoughts.


I'm Irish by birth, my father was Irish by choice but reluctantly British as he was born before Ireland as a nation in its own right came into being. I have a British Passport that describes me as a 'subject' & live in England that is part of Great Britain which in turn is part of the United Kingdom.


When I'm watching a rugby or other sports match I am Irish, when I pay my taxes I am British - so what am I? I am a person in my own right like everyone is.


BTW, I care less if you are impressed or not.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would you like to rephrase this?  Your wording gives the impression that TfL is trying to expel its own employees from the country. TfL has changed nothing. The government visa rules have changed and this affects some TfL staff and their right to work in the UK.  As far as I am aware, TfL and the Mayor are working with the unions to try and keep those affected in their jobs.
    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...