Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Thank you expat; that was very helpful


Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *tired sigh*

>

> peterstorm I'm not claiming that the forum fully

> represents the views of ED. I'm saying that it's

> as good if not better than all the alternatives.

> In terms of practicality, timeliness and value for

> money.

>

> WTF is it with some of you guys? What would you

> prefer?

>

> *shakes head*


Sorry if I have disappointed you to the point of such weariness Huguenot- I was simply trying to get some certainty of numbers to end that potential sidetrack. Also, notwithstanding the far greater numbers of viewers/responders on this forum I was trying to add a note of caution to arriving at a conclusion from such responses. Whether it is 2000, 4000, or whatever number that consider the question here, it will only be from those who use this form of communication and that ignores certain sections of the local populous entirely. True representation of the demographic - which may be by a very small response rate - is far more important than quantity of answers.

peterstorm1985 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Thank you expat; that was very helpful

>

> Huguenot Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > *tired sigh*

> >

> > peterstorm I'm not claiming that the forum

> fully

> > represents the views of ED. I'm saying that

> it's

> > as good if not better than all the

> alternatives.

> > In terms of practicality, timeliness and value

> for

> > money.

> >

> > WTF is it with some of you guys? What would you

> > prefer?

> >

> > *shakes head*

>

> Sorry if I have disappointed you to the point of

> such weariness Huguenot- I was simply trying to

> get some certainty of numbers to end that

> potential sidetrack. Also, notwithstanding the far

> greater numbers of viewers/responders on this

> forum I was trying to add a note of caution to

> arriving at a conclusion from such responses.

> Whether it is 2000, 4000, or whatever number that

> consider the question here, it will only be from

> those who use this form of communication and that

> ignores certain sections of the local populous

> entirely. True representation of the demographic

> - which may be by a very small response rate - is

> far more important than quantity of answers.


Exactly. This forum should not be making decisions on behalf of the majority of the community that aren't quite as time-rich as the denizens of the edf.

Another NO I am afraid. The reason why most people came to live in East Dulwich and like to shop at Lordship lane so much is precisely because there are no big chain stores! Bringing and M&S or Waitrose would eventually bring other high street chains and we don't want that! .. leave this bit of London as it is .. it's becoming harder and harder to find streets like this one in London!

Knocking on doors across East Dulwich it seems about 10x as many people reading EDF as posting.

I've had many emails, texts and a few PM's that broadly correlates to the ration of people for or against. They clearly didn't feel they wanted to expose themselves to some of the direct responses that do sometimes appear on the forum.


This thread was meant to test opinion in finger in the air way. It was never meant to be definitive but an indicator.It has been really useful in achieving that small simple aim.


THANK YOU to everyone who's responded in whatever way felt best for them.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Knocking on doors across East Dulwich it seems

> about 10x as many people reading EDF as posting.

> I've had many emails, texts and a few PM's that

> broadly correlates to the ration of people for or

> against. They clearly didn't feel they wanted to

> expose themselves to some of the direct responses

> that do sometimes appear on the forum.

>

> This thread was meant to test opinion in finger in

> the air way. It was never meant to be definitive

> but an indicator.It has been really useful in

> achieving that small simple aim.

>

> THANK YOU to everyone who's responded in whatever

> way felt best for them.


so what are you going to do with the info that you've collected?

Ok, Question Waitrose or M&S TYPE supermarket - do we want one on LL?


Thread Started By Councilor James Barber.


12016 Views 435 Posts. Do we want one on LL? Mixed response.


It is not really a question of whether we want one or not.


It is a question of if Waitrose or M&S want to set up stall in East Dulwich.


If so, Have they already applied to Southwark Council to do so. ??


If there were interest from these two very influential Giants, there may be some scope for

people scratching each others backs.

Exactly. This forum should not be making decisions on behalf of the majority of the community that aren't quite as time-rich as the denizens of the edf.


Okay, first of all, this forum is not making any decisions about anyhting!!


Secondly, do you really think a big supermarket chain would give a toss anyway? If they want to open in an area, they will, if they dont, they won't.

If we were to have either, my vote would be Waitrose over the overpriced processed foods that M&S sell. Having said that, I'd rather have Waitrose instead of the Coop rather than in addition to. Lordship Lane is fabulous because of its independent shops - we need no additional supermarket, but I have shopped at Sainsbury's, Coop and Waitrose over the years and have always found the foods I buy from Waitrose are sold further from their use by date and tend to have been cared for better in transit so I'd rather my money go to them.

cheryla Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think this would be a great assett, either would

> work well with the current mix of businesses and

> drive more traffic to the area so the other shops

> would benefit.


Well I don't have much to say regarding what would or wouldn't be a great asset to the area, but as a local I would say that there is nowhere to park here so I just can't see what more traffic would do for the area. It may come but sure as heck it will go. I don't even think about LL as a place to park anymore if I'm in a hurry, as the chances of getting a spot are slim to none. There is no more space here.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Exactly. This forum should not be making decisions

> on behalf of the majority of the community that

> aren't quite as time-rich as the denizens of the

> edf.

>

> Okay, first of all, this forum is not making any

> decisions about anyhting!!

>

> Secondly, do you really think a big supermarket

> chain would give a toss anyway? If they want to

> open in an area, they will, if they dont, they

> won't.


So,what you're saying is this thread is 15-pages of pointless navel-gazing? I agree.


The interesting thing to come out of it is that some people genuinely think this forum speaks for ED though.

So,what you're saying is this thread is 15-pages of pointless navel-gazing? I agree.


Yes, on that, we agree.


The interesting thing to come out of it is that some people genuinely think this forum speaks for ED though.


You're misrepresenting. What "some people" (me included) are saying, is that the forum allows one to canvas opinion in a wider, and more cost effective manner than any of the alternatives. Of course there are lots of people in ED that don't use the forum, but to suggest that the only people using it are middle class 30 somethings with "time on their hands", is a nonsense.

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What "some people" (me included) are saying, is that the forum allows one

> to canvas opinion in a wider, and more cost

> effective manner than any of the alternatives.


more cost effective maybe but wider - i don't think so


> Of course there are lots of people in ED that don't

> use the forum, but to suggest that the only people

> using it are middle class 30 somethings with "time

> on their hands", is a nonsense.


i don't know about the demographics on here but i'd be amazed if middle class 30 somethings with time on their hands aren't massively overrepresented

And what exactly do you count Iceland and the Co-op as?




ASHEALEY Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Another NO I am afraid. The reason why most people

> came to live in East Dulwich and like to shop at

> Lordship lane so much is precisely because there

> are no big chain stores! Bringing and M&S or

> Waitrose would eventually bring other high street

> chains and we don't want that! .. leave this bit

> of London as it is .. it's becoming harder and

> harder to find streets like this one in London!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
    • Looks great! but could it be possible to pinch the frames a bit tighter with some long nose pliers and add more struts to stop the tree rats getting inside? Also, the only issue with a mesh base is that it could attract rats towards your property.
    • I struggled with the parakeets literally decimating the bird feeders within an hour.  I tried squirrel proof ones to see if they helped, but they jammed their claws in the mechanism to stop it closing.  Then the pigeons managed to do the same.  I spent a long time researching the best ideas and came across something on Pinterest.  Someone had used a metal dog cage and attached it to a wooden platform.  So that's what I did!  Once set up, you just hang the feeders inside.  Large birds like pigeons and parakeets cannot get inside.  I get all the small birds, plus starlings.  Not many thrushes or blackbirds around, so have no idea if they could get in.  The squirrels do!  It's amazing watching them slide through narrow gaps.  I also covered the roof of the cage with a piece of plastic to keep the rain off, plus I am just about to replace the cage plastic base with something more mesh like.  It can get a bit gooey after a while, so with mesh, all the dropped seed from the messy goldfinches, will go on to the ground where the pigeons can clear up.  I even added a birdcam.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...