Jump to content

Recommended Posts

he isn't banned but I suspect he may have had enough of getting into stupid arguments with the likes of me. I know how he feels


But I'm still curious as to why you or others are saying he is banned


I mean YOU are banned but have come back under a different name, Dickensman

I find it slightly patronising hearing all the 'original' guys yearning for the golden years of the forum. I'm not sure that constant moaning about the current state of the forum will help to improve it.


So, all ye backslappers of a bygone era, why not start the EDF VIP room? that way you don't have to suffer the cheap, witless inane, nonsense spouted by the likes of me.


I for one, really enjoy the forum... sometimes there are engaging debates, sometimes there is utter tripe... most of the time I think it is very entertaining.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You will be missed Quids, but your are one of a

> long line of interesting people who have dropped

> away for one reason or another.

>

> I suspect you will be back soon though, hopefully.


You'll def be missed, your posts are brilliant and you always start good threads. Even this cheerio thread is interesting :)


Enjoy your break and hope you do come back soon, I can't think of many who provide a refreshingly individual view against some of the socialist worker type cr@p on here. That's my opinion anyway. Cheerio for now.

katie1997 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > You will be missed Quids, but your are one of a

> > long line of interesting people who have

> dropped

> > away for one reason or another.

> >

> > I suspect you will be back soon though,

> hopefully.

>

> You'll def be missed, your posts are brilliant and

> you always start good threads. Even this cheerio

> thread is interesting :)

>

> Enjoy your break and hope you do come back soon, I

> can't think of many who provide a refreshingly

> individual view against some of the socialist

> worker type cr@p on here. That's my opinion

> anyway. Cheerio for now.



SWP on the EDF ?


I cant say I have ever seen any of that filth...can you direct me to a relevant post ?


ta

> You'll def be missed, your posts are brilliant and

> you always start good threads.


I agree with Lady Katharina van der Wotsit. What's more, your - generally - charasmatic posts bring humour, fun and creativity to the forum. I even love it when you throw your toys out of the pram. No-one does that with as much flair as you do:)).


Don't stay away too long Master Quids.


xx

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • - had all the wrong connections at the wrong time - fraternised with some well dodgy blokes or rather one at least   - smart and  smooth talker - he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter - he is highly polished - skilled at making personal connections - never liked or trusted the chap, reminiscent of a slime ball
    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...