Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Exactly Keef - although to be fair the latest versions I played last week show just enough progress (mostly around 360 degree movement instead of normal 8 direction pad - but anyway)


I never trust them either - if I play against the computer and leave my pad untouched, the opposition should just walk the ball into the net - but no, they all act like 11 Franny Jeffers and kick the ball every which way for 10 minutes

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I got bored of FIFA games, because basically you

> pay for the same game year in year out, with just

> a few minimal improvements IMO.


Isn?t that the ultimate in realism though? It?s exactly like the premiership.

As a little stocking filler you could give yourself this tower defence game.

It's very well balanced, good looking and rather addictive. Not bad for about 7 quid.

http://www.metacritic.com/games/platforms/xbox360/defensegridtheawakening

  • 4 weeks later...

Borderlands - just brilliant.


The bastard son of Left for Dead, Fallout 3, Doom, Serious Sam and Diablo - oh and some Phantasy Star Online too - it's a loot-whoring game extraodinaire, with a beautiful graphic style. The critics and the public seem to have split on this one but Lady Mac hasn't seen me this addicted to a single game in a long time

Or do I just wair for Diablo II?


I'm currently ploughing into Forza Motorsport 3. Yes it's basically a very pretty FM2, with better physics and leaderboards but all the little touches like dirty laps, quick upgrades are well thought out, plus it's te nly game where the in car view is actually the best one as opposed to an unplayable but pretty distraction.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
    • The sad reality is that the failures of the Tories and Labour cannot solely be attributed to Brexit, as convenient as that may be
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...