Jump to content

Recommended Posts

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Letters and parcels keep getting posted through

> your letterbox year in, year out, and every one

> (every. single. one.) says your name, a street

> address then the phrase 'East Dulwich' on the

> address.


Really?


Would it not say:


your name

your street address

London

postcode

DuncanW Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Abe_froeman Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Some of SE22 is in Peckham!

>

> Is that right - what part?


Half of Peckham Rye Park - to the southeast of the lake - is in SE22, I assume that doesn't count as ED?

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DuncanW Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Abe_froeman Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Some of SE22 is in Peckham!

> >

> > Is that right - what part?

>

> Half of Peckham Rye Park - to the southeast of the

> lake - is in SE22, I assume that doesn't count as

> ED?



If you mean where I think you mean it would be Dulwich or Nunhead. Not Peckham.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rendelharris Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > DuncanW Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Abe_froeman Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Some of SE22 is in Peckham!

> > >

> > > Is that right - what part?

> >

> > Half of Peckham Rye Park - to the southeast of

> the

> > lake - is in SE22, I assume that doesn't count

> as

> > ED?

>

>

> If you mean where I think you mean it would be

> Dulwich or Nunhead. Not Peckham.


Moot, isn't it? I'd call it Peckham Rye, given that it's Peckham Rye park and runs alongside Rye Lane. I always think of Nunhead as starting to the east of Rye Lane. Could well be wrong - pretty sure it's not Dulwich though!

thought Nunhead started from the Nun's head pub around there, how do you class Hollydale Road, St.Mary's Road - always thought of them being in Peckham;


Nunhead is as link below;


http://media.rightmove.co.uk/map/_generate?width=360&height=380&polygonFillColor=%232E8E8914&polygonLineColor=%232E8E89FF&mapPolygon=umdyHflJhFfBtHfQhDbPjDvBjXrGb%5EiC%60e%40ayAToTuOyQcYbAiLq%40wPfJiFnFwOpNuSjKiClc%40&signature=OcqQP2I_bi4oh8xWmb81j3EYSdw=


- Forgot to add, nothing wrong with living in Peckaham

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the days when people would much rather an ED

> than Peckham address are probably long behind us

> now. I suspect many younger (than me) people would

> rather the Peckham address these days.


Indeed - living in SE15 but being geographically closer to East Dulwich station than Peckham Rye we use a mate's description of East Peckwitch, which I think has a nice Dickensian ring to it (and is a damned sight better name than the ridiculous estate agent "Bellenden Village"!).

This map of east dulwich shows the boundary running down crystal palace road and up Upland road.


http://www.2.southwark.gov.uk/download/downloads/id/11095/east_dulwich_ward_map


When it comes to voting all the Se22 addresses east and north of there are in Camberwell and Peckham !

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the days when people would much rather an ED

> than Peckham address are probably long behind us

> now. I suspect many younger (than me) people would

> rather the Peckham address these days.


Maybe if they are renting. If they've got a house to sell I suspect they wouldn't because rightly or wrongly the postcode would be likely to make a difference to value. You correctly identify that it matters to estate agents - that's because there is likely to be a price differential.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> And the days when people would much rather an ED

> than Peckham address are probably long behind us

> now. I suspect many younger (than me) people would

> rather the Peckham address these days.


Yes - that's very much happening. The best thing about East Dulwich, is Peckham.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If they've got a house to sell I suspect they wouldn't because rightly or

> wrongly the postcode would be likely to make a

> difference to value.


It certainly was the case 3-4 years ago when we last moved (to SE15). Now... the Bellenden/Goose Green side of Peckham doesn't seem any cheaper than ED to me. It's probably more expensive than some bits of SE22.

Abe ? that map is for the electoral ward of East Dulwich. A ward which shares the name of the broader suburb, but not necessarily the same border.


Many of the electoral wards in Southwark are not named that way, such as The Lane, Brunswick Park and Faraday. I doubt anyone would identify as living in Faraday.


So I don't think that is definitive for that reason. Also it misses out chunks at the bottom that most people would recognise as East Dulwich.


Also, proximity to a park or common bearing the name of one suburb doesn't mean that all touch-points are in that suburb. Clapham Common is an obvious example as the western end is Battersea and the southern end is Balham.

Can't resist, sorry.

The Postcodes define it all. If your address is SE15 you ain't in Dulwich.

Peckham Rye PARK is SE22

Peckham Rye COMMON is SE15.

(The Peckham Society get very excited about this when someone gets it wrong.)

There are two roads called Peckham Rye: the East side is SE15 (odd Numbers) and the west side is SE22 (even numbers).


Nunhead really should have been given its own postcode but of course it shares Peckham's being SE15.


Meanwhile, postcodes go alphabetically. But NW1 SW1 E1 SE1 N1 (NE is outside of London) are the areas closest to the centre. But then they start from A again after a while.

So you have:


SE2 Abbey Wood

SE3 Blackheath

SE4 Ummm

SE5 Camberwell

SE6 Catford

SE7 Charlton

SE8 Deptford

SE9 Errr

SE10 Greenwich

SE11 Hnnnhhh umm

Se12 Lee

SE13 Lewisham

SE14 New Cross

SE15 PECKHAM

SE16 Rotherhithe

SE17 um

SE18

SE19

SE20

Se21 Dulwich

SE22 EAST Dulwich

SE23 Forest Hill

SE24 who cares

SE25 Lost Interest now.

SE26 is Sydenham


"The funeral was in one of those God awful places to get to, like Sydenham"


Alan Bennett 'dissed' the place in one of his books. I whooped with joy when I read the above

(tho it's become easier now the overground is here, so I hope you're reading this and taking note Alan)

Endured in the ladies' wet changing room at Dulwich Leisure Centre just now:


Child repeatedly honking very loud horn on scooter (hello, hygiene, topic of many conversations with DLC).


Fond mother, very brightly repeating, 'That's a very annoying noise, isn't it?'


YES IT IS. JUST TELL HIM TO STOP.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...