Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hubby is currently contracting in Finland, so things like accommodation are down to him. Prior to leaving for Finland, he pre-booked a hotel on-line for a few days only - just in case it didn't correspond with his requirements. It is an internet-only hotel - so no walk-ins. Thankfully, this temporary place of residence suits his needs and he now wishes to extend his stay for a month. On approaching the, on the face of it, highly laid back hotel "management" to do this, he was instructed to simply leave the money in his room in an envelope for someone to collect at some point during the day (whilst he is at work). Hubby's view is that, bearing in mind that we are not talking about a pittance here, this - to a street-wise Londoner, anyway - all seems rather odd.


I should say that, for better or for worse, I have a tendency to overly trust (so I am constantly told), and so - on hearing of hubby's "predicament" - my first reaction was one of delight that the Finns appeared to be devoid of the distrust prevalent in cities like London. Hubby, however, is far more sceptical and is worried about leaving a wad of cash in the room in this way.


Apparently, there is no other mechanism for extending the stay. So what should he do? Is his cynicism justified or am I being a bit too naive?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/15495-should-he-trust/
Share on other sites

Yes, I have to say I am with you Sean (and karter): sometimes you just have to trust.


As for you, your Majesty, hubby is definitely with you!


But there is - even in my overly trusting mind - this little speck of apprehension. It's not an insignificant amount of dosh to lose. (And he is working so hard, in the extreme cold, with little daylight, away from home :().

No way. Why on earth would they want you to leave an envelope of cash in the room? Best case scenario is that they're hoping to pocket the money, while telling the management the room was empty. Worst case scenario is that the money will disappear, and it will be your word against theirs. Neither of these would make me feel even slightly better about the world.

Am not quite sure why they want it to just be left in the room - it makes no sense for him not to be able to hand it to someone, even if they have to specify that he has to do it at a particular time.


If he has a problem appearing not to trust them, just tell them that he needs to hand it over and get a receipt for tax purposes. Might help save face. Or do the booking online as suggested.

Thank you expat. He is about an hour or so a drive from Helsinki - out in the sticks.


His current hotel is the only one there: it is convenient to his place of work. Were he to move this would incur travelling costs and a troublesome journey into work in the cold (public transportation is limited and he has not hired a car).


You sound as though you know a bit about Helsinki and its environs?

Hmm maybe the hotel owner is xenopobic....hence the lack of human involvement.....


By the way...have you seen the movie 'Hostel'? It suddenly comes to mind.....hotel in the middle of nowhere...the only one....leave the cash on the table to be collected.......just saying like lol.....;-)

> Hmm maybe the hotel owner is xenopobic....hence

> the lack of human involvement.....


Oh I doubt that very much...my contact with Finns has always been very, very positive - extremely friendly lot. I think the lack of human involvement is purely down to the fact that it's an internet-hotel. Hubby himself has said that the guy was very pleasant - just disarmingly laid back.

>

> By the way...have you seen the movie 'Hostel'? It

> suddenly comes to mind.....hotel in the middle of

> nowhere...the only one....leave the cash on the

> table to be collected.......just saying like

> lol.....;-)


HA HA HA PMSL

> Risk management: if they insist on money being

> left in the room, just leave enough to cover each

> day's board.


That's a really good idea; only he would have to leave at least one week's board as someone comes in to clean etc. once a week only. But I think hubby would like your thinking.

Surely he just has to say that he can't leave it in his room as he needs a receipt for work/tax purposes.Receipt = proof of purchase. My experience of Scandanavians(have spent time in Sweden and Norway on work trips) though is that they are as honest as the day is long........er, short. If he is in the sticks probably even moreso.

The receipt is not the problem: they are willing to issue this automatically. BUT it will be issued in place of the cash (in the room). It seems that the personnel floating around the hotel are not willing/allowed to take the cash and/or issue receipts at a personal level.


I agree with you on natives from Scandinavian/Nordic countries though: very nice people.

This is an internet hotel! The management probably hasn't even seen most of the guests - who knows who they really are? Probably not even Finnish - could have booked in with stolen credit card details for all we know.


There's no merit in trust when there are so many unknown quantities involved.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Its a mistake a 4 year old made 😂😂😂 forget it and move on
    • We don’t even need Victorian values. Many of theses monstrosities are made by Japanese companies but would never be sold in Japan because in Japan the dimensions of cars are strictly regulated due to their narrow street layout. I grew up in terraced streets in the 1970s, playing football and even cricket among the then relatively few parked cars. To walk through ED and see every square inch of every street taken up by a parked car and not a child playing is like a Silent Spring.
    • Word to the wise: please be careful if you’re around Dulwich Village during the school run.  While walking on the pavement down Carlton Avenue this morning c. 8.45am, I was hit from behind by a child riding a bicycle. When I raised this with his father, he (the father) behaved inappropriately. I highlight the following tactics deployed against me, so if you choose to say anything, you may come off better in any exchange than I. The father chose to make it more about how I reacted, rather than what had happened, namely that his son was riding on a pavement, seemingly without supervision, out of his father’s line of sight. The father claimed I was over-reacting, said that his son was 4-years old and didn’t do it deliberately. He didn’t ask me if I was alright. And apologised with a ‘but’: “I’m sorry if he hit your leg, but your reaction is over the top.”  He took no responsibility for his child’s action or his lack of parental supervision. As I walked away, I heard him and two other adults talking and laughing about my reaction – yes, laughing.  I don’t think he or his son learned anything useful from the incident about keeping themselves and others safe, such that it would change their behaviour. I did and share it here as to place, time, nature of incident, minimising tactics etc. as a heads-up to others. I didn’t sustain any injuries or damage to my clothing or property. Others who are older/younger, have mobility issues, walk with buggies, children, pets etc. may fare differently. Forewarned is forearmed, guys.
    • Found on Goodrich Rd
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...