Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Did I miss the thread on here about Theresa May?

> Whose media presence has been notable by its

> absence, apart from one or two abysmal instances?


There isn't a specific thread on May but she's taken plenty of flak in this thread, quite rightly so...

Relax, all is fine.


Dianne is up and about looking her usual robust self this morning and she has given her vote.


Please, can all of us who are registered in Hackney give her your vote today and hope that it will ot be too long before she re-appears on BBC Question Time.

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it better for a politician to attempt to answer

> a question and get it wrong/fumble about for an

> answer, or to not even attempt to answer a

> question repeatedly and give hackneyed soundbites

> instead. Even if asked the same question 6 times?


Surely that is up to the public to decide. Purely a subjective matter.

One Who Does Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> titch juicy Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Is it better for a politician to attempt to

> answer

> > a question and get it wrong/fumble about for an

> > answer, or to not even attempt to answer a

> > question repeatedly and give hackneyed

> soundbites

> > instead. Even if asked the same question 6

> times?

>

> Surely that is up to the public to decide. Purely

> a subjective matter.


Agreed. That's why I'm asking the public.

If the question is about her special field then she should know the answer, or at least be carrying about the notes so that she can find the answer; and if not, she should own up to not knowing.

I once observed a teacher who was teaching a GCSE class the completely wrong thing- I discretely pointed it out so that he could rectify the error but he would not do it....epic fail- her performance reminded me of that incident

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If the question is about her special field then

> she should know the answer, or at least be

> carrying about the notes so that she can find the

> answer; and if not, she should own up to not

> knowing.

> I once observed a teacher who was teaching a GCSE

> class the completely wrong thing- I discretely

> pointed it out so that he could rectify the error

> but he would not do it....epic fail- her

> performance reminded me of that incident



If somebody is ill, they may be rendered incapable of doing the simplest thing.


I have no idea what may be the nature of Diane's illness, but sometimes when I've been unwell in the past (physically, but also including being off work with stress) I couldn't​ do anything much at all, let alone anything requiring thought.


I agree she shouldn't have been put in that position if she was ill, but we have no idea of the background.

Theresa May was up front about her diabetes- why do we not know what is wrong with Diane- then it would end the speculation. Although she cannot have been ill when she said all those other things about Harriet Harman and Tony Blair's school choices, or the Andrew Neil interview about why she chose private for her child...

It's fair to say Abbott has never made it easy for herself, and I don't have a lot of sympathy for the political situation she finds herself in.


But if there is actuall illness, one possibility is that she doesn't have a full diagnosis yet, she may be waiting on test results etc before making an announcement.

What edcam said.


I have been thinking, in the absence of any reply from Admin, that I will have to take up my commitment to leave the forum. This has been characterised as 'flouncing' or what have you - obviously, just a personal weakness of mine, or whatever you choose to associate with that word. So there it is. Au revoir.

jaywalker Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What edcam said.

>

> I have been thinking, in the absence of any reply

> from Admin, that I will have to take up my

> commitment to leave the forum. This has been

> characterised as 'flouncing' or what have you -

> obviously, just a personal weakness of mine, or

> whatever you choose to associate with that word.

> So there it is. Au revoir.


Oh gawd, really JW


Stop being a nob, have a cup of tea and come back once you've cooled off.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> hmmm it's not as if she's only just been diagnosed

> with it...


To be fair (and I speak as one who's not a great fan and would rather Corbyn kept her out of the shadow cabinet) she admits she failed to manage it properly in the hurly-burly of the election, and I think most people who've had to manage a long term chronic illness will recognise the difficulties of keeping on top of it at times of great stress. It was clear that there was something wrong - someone with a Cambridge degree might well get figures wrong but they don't start spouting rubbish like we'll have half a million policemen for ten grand or whatever it was unless there's something badly wrong. Some of the interviewers who so relished using her as a coconut shy might want to have a word with themselves, and the social media bullying has been beneath contempt - the Tories also didn't exactly cover themselves with glory by raising the prospect of her in power at every opportunity. I do also feel though that Corbyn and his team must take some responsibility and should have pulled her out earlier when it was clear she was struggling - not only for her own sake but in an election where they lost 42%-40% who knows how many votes her "car crash" performances cost.


Sorry, banging on a bit but one thing more: had Mrs.May, herself a diabetic, made slips on figures due to mismanaging her medication, one suspects the majority of the press would have said poor woman, what a heroine for sacrificing herself for the country, hats off to her - they would definitely have looked for a reason rather than immediately starting with "Cor what a thickie" headlines.

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't see how you can ask the interviewers to

> have a word with themselves,it's part of their job

> to pick up on errors/cock-ups etc, and like the

> rest of us they didn't know about her condition...


Indeed, but it needn't be part of their jobs to act sneeringly and aggressively when these errors are made - why not politely say, "I think you may want to correct yourself there," not "What? Are you seriously telling me...?" a la Nick Ferrari. Why did he have to start pretty much shouting at her with derision, clearly relishing her confusion? Perhaps if he wasn't so consumed with his own ego he might have thought something's wrong here, she's very confused, let's give her a chance to recover without putting the boot in.


I'm not asking that we go back to the 1950s style of "Prime Minister, perhaps you'd like to tell us which of your successes you think are most notable..." but the way many interviewers now set themselves up as the opposition is tiresome and militates against getting the best out of the subject and the most valuable information for the viewers/listeners. Eddie Mair on PM on Radio 4 is a prime example of how an interviewer can be affable, courteous, witty and still hard hitting - he gets much more out of his interviewees than, for example, John Humphries or Nick Robinson on Today, who interrupt sneeringly at every opportunity and who take up 75% of any interview with the sound of their own voice.


ETA - no, they didn't know about her condition, but if many of us on here guessed there was something physically and/or mentally wrong with her, to someone sitting opposite her in a radio booth that must have been quite obvious and a reason to back off, not relish her confusion and try to trip her up even more.

With Ferrari and other shock jocks of his ilk, you know exactly beforehand what he's going to be like if he gets a sniff of something. Forewarned id forearmed etc.


Posters on here were guessing about her physical/mental state after she announced she was temporarily standing down from campaigning (June 7th), not at the time of the car crash interviews. Hindsight is a wonderful thing...

Well the thread didn't start until evening of June 6th! Certainly a lot of people elsewhere, both online and people I spoke to, were saying directly after the Ferrari interview that there must be something wrong with her, you don't get things that spectacularly wrong if you're in a normal healthy state.

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

you don't get things

> that spectacularly wrong if you're in a normal

> healthy state.


Of course you do/could. A lack of intelligence or a lack of attention to detail can result in many unprofessional mistakes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just catching up on some of this thread. My own view is that the BBC clearly misquoted Trump in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen, and continues to repeat this lie even now. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this a story, more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. Trump used the term "fight" twenty time, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". In my opinion, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to "...fight. We fight like Hell and if you don't fight like Hell, you're not going to have a country anymore. The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. Both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They (we) also face a 1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented act from the supposed 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet is ridiculous'. It is very clear that the Telegraph would love to end the BBC, as would the Times etc. For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him where to go, does show a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...