Jump to content

Harris Boys East Dulwich


sarz

Recommended Posts

I don't think I'm naive at all. I've lived in Peckham for 14 years afterall! But phrases like 'military style discipline' and 'semi-feral spoilt brats' sit uncomfortably with me. For example if teachers had this prejudice, how does that indicate respect to the kids in any way? Why should they earn it if people think this of them and that they are beyond hope? And what's wrong with choosing what A-levels and degrees they do? They know best what suits their own needs and personal development, rather than fitting in with the governments agenda for what people should be employed to do. From what i can gather it's them that have caused the unemployment issues in the first place.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please tell me we are not talking seriously about bringing back the cane?


We had the cane at school too and were hit with rulers. I can remember children being dragged into the teacher's store cupboard by their hair and given the ruler. One girl wet herself with the fear of it and was hit again. This was normal, a state primary school in a nice area.


I for one am very glad that we have moved on this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The fact there are so many disruptive children in the education system needs some reflection on the system as an institution itself and not just locating the problem with parenting. In the many schools I have visited I see children already turned off from learning from aged 5 becuase of their early experiences of education."



BB - we disagree completely I can see.


THese children aged 5 are turned off education because it is the first example of consistent discipline (aka "parenting")they have faced.


Allowing bad behaviour in schools exacerbates the issues these children have. THey have enough to deal with surely from their backgrounds of split families, poor housing, with "uncles" galore, never meeting anyone who has a job or pays their way in life, alcolholism in the home, drug use, appalling diets and zero supervision or encouragement to do well and better their lot.


Give them a chance - ensure attentive classes where children like these can be set a good example and "good" pupils who want to get on can learn in peace, for goodness sake. THis is the only way any of these children are ever going to break the cycle and lead the meaningful lives that their parents didn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Z, by "uncles", I meant that the mother has lots of temporary partners and the child has no stable male role model. (I didn't mean the mother had lots of brothers!)


Yes, I totally agree. THere are plenty of ch from well off bakcgrounds who are appallingly behaved and either totally spoilt or ignorsd. Here in ED, sadly we are not talking about very rich people! We are talking about the problems the local schools apparently have with the combination of well behaved children plus very badly behaved ch and whether Gove' s disciploine ideas are benefiical or not for improving the behaviour of the latter group and therefore the overall group....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd argue that many people are indeed really rather well off in ED! Even if they don't believe it themselves!!! Just because you might not be quite able to afford private school or are choosing to send your children to the good local schools that doesn't mean you're not well off. If you can afford to buy a house in ED, or move to ED for the good schools you're well off, and it doesn't mean the children coming from those families are not the children causing disruptions in class. Look at the thread on swearing for example!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought so HH. If they're calling other children gits at 5 years old and telling the teacher to f off when they ask them to apologise where do you draw the line? So no I'm not kidding. That's sounds disruptive to me. How do you know they're not going to continue into primary school with that kind of attitude?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

cn150 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hello,

> I'm cn150 who started a similar discussion back in

> October 2010. Is it true about the school

> potentially using the Athenlay sports ground? Has

> anyone else heard about this?


I have heard this is true, though not directly from the school. My son is starting at Harris in September and has been playing for Athenlay FC for a few years so the drums have been beating from a couple of directions!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

new mother Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> BB - we disagree completely I can see.

>


As usual! I do agree with you that disruptive pupils are a big problem but laying the blame solely on parents is a mistake; although that is where it starts it is a more complex than that. Poor teaching, poor environment, lack of facilties, implicit discrimination, etc can all contribute and pointing the finger at parents can ignore the wider issues. I have watched children who were lovely in nursery become disruptive in Year 1 because of a range of reasons directly contributed by the school. Conversely I have seen troubled children with a difficult family background really blossom at school with supportive guidance from caring adults. A good school has positive relationships with their pupils, not regimented sargent majors. I'm not talking about wishy-washy relationships that let children do what they like but respectful, reciprical relationships that provide clear and consistent boundaries and listen to and support children's individual needs. The best schools I've worked in are the ones like that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This evening I attended a music recital at my sons primary school, I spotted an older boy from Harris Boys AED the older sibling of a child performing and grilled him as to his experiences of the school especially discipline etc.. He was a charming well spoken, polite boy, said he loved the school, was in the choir, choral choir, and jazz band and that there is also a reggae band and soon to be steel pans, he loves music and is really happy with the music teachers and their enthusiasm. Art is also a favourite lesson, with a great room and new photography lab. There is lots of sports, not his favourite but enjoying it. And no, he has never had any discipline metered out to him, he said if you misbehave then you suffer the consequences. I asked if he had been the victim of any bullying and he said no, and that anyone caught bullying suffered the severest of discipline. My conversation with him did much to calm my worries about the school (especially music as my son loves to sing) and soothe my disappointment of my son getting his fifth choice.

Thought I'd share this, hopefully it might be helpful to others in the same boat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Report it to your local Safer Neighbourhood Police.  If you come under Dulwich Hill, there is a meeting at Christ Church Barry Road on  Weds 12th June at 6 pm and members of the Police team will be there, Last time we had 3 officers,
    • Southwark has an Anti Social Behaviour Officer who will take up issues re any Southwark tenant. The fact you spoke about a resident services officer indicates that Southwark has an interest. I have sat on committees with police and ASB officer have worked together to try and solve issues with neighbours. I will look at my records to see if I can find the name of the officer - it was a woman.
    • Our neighbour had a loft conversion and we signed a party wall agreement - there was no encroachment on our property at all.   His property is leasehold with Southwark being the freeholder, also the ground floor flat is a Southwark tenancy and they were notified. I would definitely get building regs involved.
    • It is particularly important that you have a survey done before the work commences (which should be paid for by your neighbour) - this allows a 'before and after' picture to identify any issues caused by your neighbour's work - which again must be remedied at his expense. As this all must be paid for by your neighbour (under law) it may be an acceptable risk to commission your own survey (again your right to choose the surveyor although your neighbour can offer his own surveyor or structural engineer, which is normally cheaper for him, if you are prepared to trust that).  You might additionally, although the surveyor should also do this, photograph any areas in your property you believe may be at risk - new cracks in plasterwork are his responsibility to remedy as well. Your neighbour is quite wrong to suggest that the work he is intending does not fall into the party wall legislation - and informing both Southwark and the ground landlord of his intentions is a good first step. As others have said, a solicitor's letter to remind him of his legal obligations might be an expense worth bearing. The potential damage to his and your property could be irreparable. Other than choice of surveyor (his or yours) there are no other areas of negotiation - the party wall legislation is surprisingly clear on this, I believe.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...