Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think it's as meaningful as it first sounded, for instance it doesn't take into account a No Deal scenario.

It's more about May limping on and avoiding losing a vote in the HoC, which would probably lead to bringing her down...



Open Britain, which is campaigning for a soft Brexit, has put out this statement about David Davis?s announcement. It is from the Labour MP Chris Leslie. He says:


What could have been a very welcome concession by the government, instead looks like a sham that pretends to respect the sovereignty of parliament but falls well short of what is required.


It?s a transparent and fairly desperate attempt at the eleventh hour to save face and avoid losing votes in the House.


Ministers need to do much better. It is crucial that this meaningful vote takes place well before we leave; that defeat for the government?s legislation will not imply leaving the EU with no deal; and that parliament has the same role in the event of a disastrous ?no deal? outcome.

You're probably right as Dominic Grieve has refused to withdraw the original amendment.


This government will try anything to limp along.


"Davis says, if MPs reject any aspect of the Brexit deal bill, that will be taken by the government as an instruction to go back to Brussels and try again. But whether they take any notice is a matter for them, he says."


What an arse - we won't fall for that.

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Theresa May gets to live another few weeks as PM -

> It's premier league manager stuff :)

>

>

> I assume this deal will be either (1) Take the

> deal or (2) Exit with no deal

>

> We now want to make sure it becomes more like (1)

> Take the deal (2) go back and re-negotiate (3)

> Remain (4) Exit with no deal


If there is enough support, a bill can always be amended...

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You're probably right as Dominic Grieve has

> refused to withdraw the original amendment.

>

> This government will try anything to limp along.

>

> "Davis says, if MPs reject any aspect of the

> Brexit deal bill, that will be taken by the

> government as an instruction to go back to

> Brussels and try again. But whether they take any

> notice is a matter for them, he says."

>

> What an arse - we won't fall for that.


Actually he's got a point here although I'm a bit confused as to the timing.


If 27 EU Parliaments (and the relevant regional Parliaments) vote unanimously to approve the deal and it then comes before the UK Parliament who decide it's not good enough what obligation is there for the EU to renegotiate?


You could find Parliament causes a no-deal result if it's not careful

We?re nit going to negotiate a deal in time. We?ll go into the ?transition period? (ie business as usual) and brextremists will lose their sh1t. May will get ditched and we?ll end up in paralysis. I suspect things will remain chaotic for a number of years.
As things stand this MPs vote is still meaningless, they've been given the same choice, accept whatever the deal is or it's a no deal, the only difference being it would now be recorded as an act of Gov. So it's now a question of how much backbone the Tory rebels have got when they debate this week. Then there's still the Irish Border question, hope as they might it's not going to go away...

JohnL Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > My cat (to quote 'Bad Attitude' Baracus), "aint

> > getting in no plane" anyway. So not a big issue

> > for me.

>

> BA Baracus always ends up on the plane anyway.


It's true - For an aviophobic he certainly clocks up the air miles. Also quite ironic that he's called 'BA'

It does sound like we'll have two classes of people - those defined as 'professional service workers' will have access to the EU etc, and the rest. Obviously those in one class will be more in demand.



"David Davis said he was committed to getting a swift deal on a transition period by January and mooted special travel rules to enable professional services workers to move between the UK and EU."


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2017/11/15/jp-morgan-begins-telling-uk-staff-relocated-eu/

Bob Buzzard Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Apparently Sadiq Khan is going to apply forv'DOC' status for London, so then we'll still sort of be

> in thecEUnafter Brexit as we will have protected status on the same lines as Parmesan or Roquefort

> has.


This makes no sense - was it supposed to be a joke?


DOC is not an EU term as such (the EU uses PDO and PGI) and is only available for certain goods from a region, not the region itself.

I wonder if this is because he's had a smack on the hand from the EU


ECB warns banks against Brexit 'empty shells'


European regulators have warned banks working on post-Brexit plans that they will "need to have substance locally" to serve European clients.


The European Central Bank said some of the proposals it has reviewed are inadequate and risk creating "empty shells".


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-42002200


Goes to show, you can't kid a kidder

Seriously John L? It is obvious from this thread that you have a 'remain' agenda (more than, or as much as pretty much anyone else on this forum) but you can't really be holding him and his organisation out as saying anything other than something self-serving (for their own ends). Can you?


I would be happy placing a bet that in any other context you would say 'no, don't be daft'!


Although I shouldn't need to say this - in case of (and before) and reactionary response that I am some sort of rabid Brexiteer, I will say again that I did not vote to leave - it is just that I am extremely wary of nonsense, or propaganda.

Of course he's self-serving - it's bloody Goldman Sachs! That's pretty much all they're about.


So that said, the question becomes; is this just one person mouthing off because they've been slapped down by the ECB (folkvlike him are notoriously sensitive to criticism), or the start of something wider as business starts to get fed up with what it perceives as lack of progress and clarity?


Ultimately (cynic that I am) I believe whatever deal is made will be driven by the needs and wants of corporations more than anything else, and I can't help wondering if they've decided to flex their muscles. Personally I don't think someone from Goldman Sachs does themselves any favours in this way, no one trusts a word they say and rightly so. If we see other businesses following suit and being vocal then it'll be more of a thing, until then this just looks like a petulant banker spitting his dummy.

Please contact our Frankfurt office using the following PO Box number:


Brass-Plate Bank GmbH

Passportingrightstrasse 9

Postfach 00 00 00

12345 Frankfurt

GERMANY


Please allow at least 72 hours for acknowledgement of?correspondance to allow our sole gig-economy, self-employed, Frankfurt head to log into our app when there is a lull in his Deliveroo pizza deliveries.


Your business is important to us. If urgent, please contact the London or New York offices.

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seriously John L? It is obvious from this thread

> that you have a 'remain' agenda (more than, or as

> much as pretty much anyone else on this forum) but

> you can't really be holding him and his

> organisation out as saying anything other than

> something self-serving (for their own ends). Can

> you?

>

> I would be happy placing a bet that in any other

> context you would say 'no, don't be daft'!

>

> Although I shouldn't need to say this - in case

> of (and before) and reactionary response that I am

> some sort of rabid Brexiteer, I will say again

> that I did not vote to leave - it is just that I

> am extremely wary of nonsense, or propaganda.


Not a huge fan of his - although I walk past the new Goldman Sachs HQ every morning - seems to have a floor occupied too even though it's not finished.


But he's going on about 'other directors' - wonder if it's the start of an agenda. Just wait til they get Theresa May alone in Bilderberg :)

robbin Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seriously John L? It is obvious from this thread

> that you have a 'remain' agenda (more than, or as

> much as pretty much anyone else on this forum)


I do but doubt I'm the most hardline remainer (anyone want a ladder)


it's mainly self interest/economic though - I also see myself as Welsh and Londoner over British or European I suppose.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.cityam.com/275935/david-davis-tells-ger

> many-we-not-accept-post-brexit-trade

>

> This is rich coming from David Davis. Isn't

> putting politics above prosperity what the Tories

> have been doing all along?


When I take a step back from simply being very angry that he's contributing to ruining the country, DD intrigues me. Is he, I wonder, simply very dim (the whole 'thick as mince' theory)? Or has he so surrounded himself with 'yes men', that he really has no idea of how his pronouncements sound to the world at large? I guess taking the latter course is a sign of great foolishness in itself.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...