Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

So....a UN resolution has been passed and US, UK, French and Arab nations will work together to enforce a no-fly zone over Libya to help protect civilians.


Gadaffi is already closing in on Benghazi and is bombing the city so things must move very quickly to be successful.


Could this be a foreign policy triumph for Cameron? Leading the international community and ensuring cooperation to overthrow a dictator without putting troops on the ground.


I have concerns over military overstretch however. Tornados and Typhoons have been committed whereas Harriers off a aircraft carrier would have been perfect had they not been scrapped. I suspect planed will launch from Cyprus but the logistics are frightening.

There's just one problem - it will be very very difficult to UK to take more than a token part in the no fly zone patrols given the recent SDSR decisions.


A working aircraft carrier and squadron of Harriers would be a huge asset right now - but one was paid off last week and the Harrier pilots given notice a few weeks earlier.


I voted for D Cameron and still applaud his economic analysis and programme - but he has yet to join up the country's foreign and defence policy properly.

I knew it involved some missile strikes to take out anti-aircraft defences, but it does seem like they are taking the opportunity to weak Gadaffi. They risk losing the important support of the Arab League. Lose that and it's back to being a West vs Arab/Muslim conflict, which would be v. bad for overall peace in the region.

The UN resolution wasn't just about "no fly" it was about preventing Gaddafi from prosecuting reprisals on Benghazi and the opposition and thus requires the targeting of more Thant just anti aircraft batteries.


PS: A no fly zone always involves missiles a d attacks on anti aircraft installations - these include radar sites, surface to air missile sites and military HQs. Otherwise your own aircraft are too vulnerable.

A no fly zone is just a direct attempt to level the playing field between Gaddafi's forces and the 'rebels' which is a bit like playing referee really whilst they fight it out. That's fine until Gadaffi starts getting the upper hand on the ground and then what? It's obvious that any kind of intervention is at least hoping for the downfall of Gadaffi.....but to be replaced by what or whom....THAT is where the UN, USA and so on go coc k-up in these matters.


Do we run the danger of being drawn into yet another middle-eastern fiasco, to protect what this time? The Suez canal? More dwindling oil supplies?


Totally agree that the Arab League are key.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe it's just me... but my interpretation of

> enforcing a no-fly-zone didn't involve missile

> strikes. And it seems that they're not just

> targetting anti-aircraft facilities.

>


Yes I thought they just dropped a few copies of the Guardian on Libya and they would all become good democrats.


This intervention is absolutely crazy. No fly zones are aren't enough on there own, you always end up having to send in the ground troops but no one has the balls for that in case we risk upsetting our Arab friends.


Let them fight it out and tell Cameron to stop watching Sky News. Anyway, why do we care who runs Libya? Just flog us your oil and don't come over here.

Jeremy


I'd dispute it is necessarily "more" than a NFZ. If you don't destroy ground forces and anti-aircraft installations (radar stations, artillery etc) then you leave your air forces vulnerable.


Rumours persist of enforcing a retreat of Gadaffi's forces far enough west to allow for some sort of peaceful partition inc. the establishment of a "free" Libya.

  • 5 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am  ill in bed with Covid. It's not that I "can't be bothered" to read things. I am feeling crap and don't have the mental  energy at the moment. I am not "brushing stuff aside and pleading ignorance." I am truthfully saying when I don't presently know enough about something to be able to comment. I have always been very careful to try to  differentiate between fact and opinion in both  my posts and other people's, and I am not clear what your point is. And I am certainly not trying to wind anybody up. This is a forum. If you don't want to respond to my posts, that's up to you. I'm not sure why you feel the need to announce it.   
    • @NewWave I know how you feel. Like you, I've lived and spent prolonged periods of time in some pretty crazy places and always thought I could handle a bunch of kids. But, no - they got to me and I was shaking like a leaf afterwards. That's what age does to us.  But I did engage with them, so bear that in mind.  My advice would be to never let anything like that stop you doing the things you love. I'm certainly not going to stop using the park, there's no way they get to take away our cherished spaces!  If you see them, just change tack and keep out of their way. My dog won't even go that way again, so that's that problem solved. (If I see them again, I'm going to keep taking photos from a safe distance). 
    • Truly horrific. Being passive or fighting back is what many of us think about by violent theft. 
    • What ridiculous waste of money 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...