Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I sent you my most personal and deeply intimate email (ever) and two months later you post it almost verbatim on a public internet forum! Nice work, I hope you're proud of yourself. I think it's quite contemptible and says more about you than you probably intended.


Of course you missed out the last paragraph....


---

This took guts to write and I hope you will give me some credit for

that. Please, whatever you decide, I'd be grateful if you would

preserve my dignity and keep this letter just between you and I.


As ever, sent with love.

---


I feel personally violated, and of course given that you know I read this forum that was clearly your malicious intention. You absolutely disgust me. I could retaliate but that's not in my nature. You're not worth it.


I was the friend you called last week, the friend who (realising you were "tired and emotional") let you cry down the phone for more than an hour about some guy getting killed on the 176. Don't ever ring me again, you'll get a less accommodating response.


I'll be writing to the moderators about your post, you had no right to quote my email in any shape or form.


PS For those of you who felt the need to pick up and throw stones, let me just say there are two sides to any story and you know nothing about me. Shame on you. Suffice to say L has been selective in her postings but I have no intention of saying any more. It's over.

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I want to know which way legalbeagle is swinging

> now? LB?


Swinging wildly between "hmmmm it was a bit mean to post his email up here", and "He must have been horrible to her if she was prepared to post that".


Honestly have no idea where I'll settle.



I don't think anyone did, Jeremy. But to get a good idea of who may be responsible for what is quite clearly a hoax, you're best off reading back through the thread, and searching for the post that betrayed the most protest at revealing what is supposedly a very private correspondence. So far the only really indignant reply I can find is this:




I'm not saying that I'm certain, as I could quite easily be wrong. But it's a start.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I could retaliate but that's not in my nature."

>

> Surely you just did?


No, I felt I had the right to respond. Posting up personal emails would have been retaliation.



Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Reads the forum but only that one post. Bogus.


I had to sign up to make that response. Think what you like.



cincinatti kid Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you think this is genuine?

> The whole thing seems a bit weird.


The lady herself will confirm authenticity. I agree, it's weird.

Agree with that. The-ex, if you really are real, and mortified, and angry, and want this to go away then don't come back on and comment. You're just giving it legs. Of course you can do what you like, but I'm just saying that the longer you're on here the longer this will take to die........

I am all of the above - very real, intensely mortified and **** angry. I have no intention of adding any facts to this sorry debacle for everyone's entertainment, I'm waiting for the mod to respond and remove the original post.


This should never have happened. It's quite sad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi Sue, they were not local solicitors. Andrea’s was based in Wales and the other firms involved were large nationwide conveyancing companies (rather than conventional high street solicitors). I’m happy to advise clients and buyers privately on what I believe to be their shortcomings but I don’t think doing so in public on the forum would be appropriate, particularly as they are not locally based. My general advice would always be to steer clear of the big conveyancing companies as they are, in my experience, notoriously difficult to contact when the need arises and the case handler is often not a fully qualified solicitor and so issues have to be referred upwards to “technical teams” internally, which was part of the problem in Andrea’s chain. Tony
    • A slightly vulnerable but hopeful post… Hi everyone, I’m a guy in my mid-thirties who’s recently moved back to London and East Dulwich (I previously lived here for many years before, so I know the area well). But if I’m honest, I’ve found the return a little tough. Most of my close friends have moved out of London to start families — totally understandable — but it’s left me feeling a bit adrift and not quite sure how to make new connections again. Work has taken up a huge chunk of my life in recent years, and I’ve definitely let hobbies, interests and a proper social life fall by the wayside. I feel like I went from a fun social life in my 20’s to suddenly blinking and realising things had gone a bit er…quiet. So, I’m trying to redress the balance a bit — mainly so myself and my partner don’t murder each other 😂, and just to meet some new local faces. I was wondering: is anyone else in a similar boat? And would there be any interest in starting a relaxed, low-key local social group? Could be a casual pub meet, sports, park hangouts, live comedy nights — open to ideas!  I’m happy to do the organising/admin side of things — just wanted to put it out there and see if there’s any appetite. I’ll gauge interest and take it from there.  If you’d prefer not to reply publicly, feel free to drop me a DM.  Cheers all! 👋
    • It's Inner London. You could move somewhere else?
    • They are people.  That's how people often behave.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...