Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I sent you my most personal and deeply intimate email (ever) and two months later you post it almost verbatim on a public internet forum! Nice work, I hope you're proud of yourself. I think it's quite contemptible and says more about you than you probably intended.


Of course you missed out the last paragraph....


---

This took guts to write and I hope you will give me some credit for

that. Please, whatever you decide, I'd be grateful if you would

preserve my dignity and keep this letter just between you and I.


As ever, sent with love.

---


I feel personally violated, and of course given that you know I read this forum that was clearly your malicious intention. You absolutely disgust me. I could retaliate but that's not in my nature. You're not worth it.


I was the friend you called last week, the friend who (realising you were "tired and emotional") let you cry down the phone for more than an hour about some guy getting killed on the 176. Don't ever ring me again, you'll get a less accommodating response.


I'll be writing to the moderators about your post, you had no right to quote my email in any shape or form.


PS For those of you who felt the need to pick up and throw stones, let me just say there are two sides to any story and you know nothing about me. Shame on you. Suffice to say L has been selective in her postings but I have no intention of saying any more. It's over.

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I want to know which way legalbeagle is swinging

> now? LB?


Swinging wildly between "hmmmm it was a bit mean to post his email up here", and "He must have been horrible to her if she was prepared to post that".


Honestly have no idea where I'll settle.



I don't think anyone did, Jeremy. But to get a good idea of who may be responsible for what is quite clearly a hoax, you're best off reading back through the thread, and searching for the post that betrayed the most protest at revealing what is supposedly a very private correspondence. So far the only really indignant reply I can find is this:




I'm not saying that I'm certain, as I could quite easily be wrong. But it's a start.

Ms B Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I could retaliate but that's not in my nature."

>

> Surely you just did?


No, I felt I had the right to respond. Posting up personal emails would have been retaliation.



Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Reads the forum but only that one post. Bogus.


I had to sign up to make that response. Think what you like.



cincinatti kid Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Do you think this is genuine?

> The whole thing seems a bit weird.


The lady herself will confirm authenticity. I agree, it's weird.

Agree with that. The-ex, if you really are real, and mortified, and angry, and want this to go away then don't come back on and comment. You're just giving it legs. Of course you can do what you like, but I'm just saying that the longer you're on here the longer this will take to die........

I am all of the above - very real, intensely mortified and **** angry. I have no intention of adding any facts to this sorry debacle for everyone's entertainment, I'm waiting for the mod to respond and remove the original post.


This should never have happened. It's quite sad.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Honestly, the squirrels are not a problem now.  They only eat what has dropped.  The feeders I have are squirrel proof anyway from pre-cage times.  I have never seen rats in the garden, and even when I didn't have the cage.  I most certainly would have noticed them.  I do have a little family of mice which I have zero problem about.  If they stay outside, that's fine with me.  Plus, local cats keep that population down.  There are rats everywhere in London, there is plenty of food rubbish out in the street to keep them happy.  So, I guess you could fit extra bars to the cage if you wanted to, but then you run the risk of the birds not getting in.  They like to be able to fly in and out easily, which they do.   
    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...