Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Just some thoughts on the Red Arrows.


They are a team of highly trained fast jet pilots flying what are essentially display rather than military aircraft.


The displays and extreme flying skills have little military implication and could be likened to the old Field Gun competition of the Royal Tournament days (sadly no more). They can be admired on the basis of skill, daring and sheer exuberance bringing joy to those watching - and not taken as an arrogant display of military might / reflection of an oppressive imperial history. There are very few countries in the world that can claim to have always been the "good guys" - so if the Red Arrows display team flies across your horizon - why not chill and enjoy the show, not seek some post modernist meaning in it.

Marmora Man


Your post is spot on - as far as it goes. I certainly wouldn't get that bothered if it happened tonight. Even if I had managed to get to sleep and they woke me up!


The bigger question is (as an intelligent person like you well knows), given their role in raising funds for British defence/invasion, would the wider world (which is the audience for the Olympics) share such a benign view, given current world events?


It's entirely possible to hold a position which cares not a jot for the rest of the world, but I would suggest that would make the holder of such a view less than ideal Olympic-decision-Making material

hang on, if it's because they're military aren't javelins based on er, javelins, weapons of war used by the Romans? I say let's not be reminded of the barbaric and imperialist days of the Roman Empire either, I mean, what did they ever do for us?


Other war related events include, the Marathon, rifle shooting, wrestling, fencing and maybe beach volleyball.


Personally I like the Red Arrows but otherwise get the Red Bull aerobatic team to do it, they wouldn't make people think of war and destruction as they do loops the loops and make the Olympic rings in the sky. But then again the Red Arra's have never made me think of that. Until now.

Red Arrows fly umarmed training aircraft. OK - ignore that one it is very weak I admit.


In the world at large there is a somewhat trying tendency toward historical revisionism that would have us be ashamed of Britains past.


We have a various times done beastly things to most of the people's of the world. WE have either enslaved them, killed them and nicked their lands, wealth and bits of interesting architecture - much of which is in the British Museum.


Guilty as charged, or at least my Great Grandparents were, but actually, not me.


I happen to be quite proud of the British Military, they get given shitty jobs to do by deeply cynical politicians who do not give them the resources that they need to do the job properly.


The Olympics is an international event - with a British flavour in 2012, no doubt 2008 will have a Chinese flavour. The Red Arrows do represent the British military tradition and so the should perform.


A bunch of small red planes trailing red, white and blue smoke is hardly a cassus bellae.

I have to say I'm with in the MP gang on this one.

Everybody likes aeroplanes with brightly coloured trails.

There is such a thing as too much sensitivity sometimes, especially if noone has actually complained.


Of course anyone in Indonesia with first hand experience of those 'trainer' hawks we sold them is probably dead, so no worries there ;)

Mark Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OK, but how many people in Iraq have died from a

> Red Arrows fly past?


none i presume, but if there was a u.s. version of the re arrows i,d hate to think of the consequences of a fly past.collateral damage,friendly fire!!!!!

All your arguments are valid Michael but not for this argument. This is not about what this nation thinks of itself and the atrocities that have been committed in its name (some of which aren?t all that long ago I might add) but about being polite to the guests you are playing host to for these games.


All those things that the native Britons have so magnanimously come to terms with still run very close to the bone in some parts of the world. (I might just add I?m not trying to have a go at the British with this statement. I?m a white South African so christ knows I know what it is like to be guilty by association)


Personally I like military displays of all sorts and religiously watch the Edinburgh Tattoo. I just don?t think that the military should have anything to do with the Olympics.


The military is a machine to propagate war and therefore everything associated with it is no matter how you dress it up. The Olympics is a competition held in the spirit of peace.

The British military are as much a part of Britain as cricket and warm beer. I think part of a wider problem is that most people in the UK have no contact with the military and so perceive it as an "alien" entity that does bad things.


The core role of the military now is to keep the peace, either through deterent or intervention. Its the politicians that put them in unpleasent and unpopular situations.


So, if the Red Arrows shouldnt be at the Olympcis because they represent war, then neither should the people who send them to war - the Politcians. Who, no doubt, will be there is spades.

I know the Red Arrows are part of the RAF, but I'm sure that's because they're the best around.

I never thought of the displays as overtly military, they just happen to use the military designed equipment to hand.

It's not really in the same spirit as the Soviet may day parades is it.


If it was was a drive past of tanks then fair enough, but I'm sure it's more to do with pretty smoke trails and impressive aerobatics.

Maybe, as someone suggested, we get the Red Bull people instead, it's just they're not as good.

But if it's reallllly so bad I can do without, in fact I don't think I'll be watching it anyway, the only enjoyable opening ceremony moment was Diana Ross' kick in the World Cup (which I think SMG mentioned. Ooh, do his initials make him overtly military? ;-))

cover blown!


I'm really not that bothered myself - although I could see how some other countries might be.


It was the tone of the original petition/email and it's motivations (NOT Anna's post) which really got my goat (see also that petrol prices one some months back)


Even if other countries are pressurising Britain into what can and can't be done, before we start to give out about it, keep in mind the pressure many countries (UK included) put on Korea re: dogs on menus when they were hosting the 88 Olympics and 2002 World Cup

Bollocks, utter utter bollocks. These Olympics don't take place for another five years. A few planes that never take part in battle showing off their skills and letting off a few plumes of smoke. How f**king sensitive to you have to be. "Oh crikey this is going upset a few people isn't it dear. It just might remind everyone of how beastly we were in the war." Like f**k it will. Bunch of namby pambys the lot of you.

I get your point completely but it is not about what people from this country think of the military. It is about what the guests that are being invited here think about it. It wouldn?t be very good form to invite them here with a ?this is our country and if you don?t like it you can fuckoff? attitude.


It just has to do with tact. You don?t go waving your willy in other people?s faces even if the fact that they are offended by it is just like sooo completely unreasonable.

The Red Arrows are an amazing aerial display team though I'm not sure how effective they'll be if your sitting in a sports stadium. There are also safety issues to consider as you can't do stunts over spectators. When you watch them at an airshow they normally cross over etc above the runway and well away from the crowd. When they do flypasts over London there is a minimum height they can fly at and if cloud cover is low then the flight is canceled.


You can't ignore the fact that they are in someway symbolic of the military even though they are one of the things that puts the G8 in GB. Perhaps we can have a Fish Battering and Chip frying display instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...