Jump to content

Recommended Posts

You reckon?


I know that most people suddenly thought what's the point in arsing about at football and risk getting 5 years in the late 70s early 80s it was like ?50 fines that were paid for by a whip round. The high profile arrests of quite a lot of lads and some serious sentences for a few basically for what on a saturday night at the time you'd get a caution for by and large stopped it. Next you'll be saying it was Ecstasy.....

lozzyloz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cheryla these low level crimes go on all the time.

> Only their perception has recently been heightened

> on this forum. The streets of ED are as

> safe/dangerous as they ever were. Just be alert

> and dont walk like a victim. You'll be fine.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Did you ever go to the martial art group called Katada loz, they always said dont walk like a victim,used to make me laugh.I joined a better club after that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's called The Restorative Place. Also, the Fired Earth storefront is under offer too, apparently. How exciting...!
    • Perhaps the view is that there are fewer people needing social housing in London, going forward, or to cap it as it is rather than increasing it. We already see the demographic changing.
    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...