Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Someone like this asked me for money in Nunhead a couple of months ago - he was on the other side of Nunhead Lane from me, near the crossroads with Linden Grove, pushing a bike. I noticed that he let some people walk past him on his side of the road, but called over to me, presumably because I was on my own. I advised him to go to the chemist 30 meters (?) further on, as they could help him better. He then swore at me and kept walking, as did I. I had heard about the scam, and his reaction to me suggests it was a scam.
I remember a man around E&C who would say he was a doctor, needing to get to the hospital to performs surgery, but he has had his wallet stolen and so needed money for a taxi. Saw him so often, and he really made an effort with his clothes etc, but was clearly a bit dirty. We saw him buying a load of beer in the offy and stopped to ask him if he had made it to the hospital on time. Even at the time making fun of him seemed a bit off, when he said we must be mixed up (as he was a vet) we just agreed. Sad life.

Emma Bailey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I saw this "cyclist" guy complete with bike asking

> for money outside Forest Hill station the other

> day. Judging by all the comments above, it sounds

> like he's earning quite well from his scam.


Maybe inland revenue should get on to him.

I ride a bike but need some money for some decent clothing. Can you all pm me your card details, including pin and password. You can sleep happily in your bed knowing that I will be able to get some Dulwich Paragon CC kit so I no longer look like a tramp
  • 2 months later...
Thought I'd post as he's still active: junction of Bellenden Road and Peckham High Street a few weeks ago, and Rye Lane latish Wednesday evening. I felt guilty refusing the first time (I was in the car at traffic lights) so gave ?1 the second. Next time (as I'm sure there will be) I'll just give him my packet of wet wipes!

well, it's common knowledge and people do like to appease their guilt by giving money to anyone who asks for some.


I offered my lunch to a homeless chap in Victoria, he said he'd only take it if it didn't have any greens or salad. We had a really good chat, he made me laugh.

  • 4 weeks later...

He was at Denmark Hill station last night and this morning just before the junction with grove lane, where the path narrows and there is a sculpture. His bike was upended, and he sat there with identical knee wounds on both occasions.


Description was mid 40 something, grey beard, foreign (guessing central/eastern european)accent. Got very verbally aggressive when I challenged him this morning loudly saying he'd been there last night and that he is a con artist. But, within 5 minutes of being challenged he'd packed up and moved off.


If I see him again I'll get a picture and report it to police - without doubt a con trick.

Self- mutilating in beggars to gain sympathy has a very long history - indeed it is almost a tradition of that profession. As long as you're not tempted to fall for it it's nice to see the old ways being kept up. Maybe he could get an Arts Council grant?

Penguin68 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Self- mutilating in beggars to gain sympathy has a

> very long history - indeed it is almost a

> tradition of that profession. As long as you're

> not tempted to fall for it it's nice to see the

> old ways being kept up. Maybe he could get an Arts

> Council grant?


He could use it to do a Bikeability course at the Velodrome and might have fewer accidents and scrapy knees. Or collaborate with Franko B..

  • 2 weeks later...
I've seen people begging with open wounds in London Bridge too. Things have clearly moved on a lot ? I remember about 6 years ago in Brockley a well-spoken man, dressed nicely, asked me for money to get back to Tunbridge Wells as he said he'd lost his phone the night before. Originally asked for ?2 and as I opened my purse, complained he didn't know how long it would take to get all the money for the ticket home. I stupidly gave him ?10. I was sleep-deprived and carrying a 1 year old so that's my excuse. Saw him 10 minutes later going into a flat nearby ? seemed to remember where his friends lived suddenly!
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just catching up on some of this thread. The BBC clearly misquoted Trump in a programme that broadly gave an accurate account of what happened on January 6th - that he inspired the attack on the Capitol. His speech did repeatedly call on people to fight. He repeatedly claimed that the election had been stolen, and continues to repeat this lie even now. He has since pardoned many of those involved in that violence. The 'journalist' at the Telegraph who 'broke' this 'story', more than a year after the Panorama documentary aired, also misquoted Trump's speech and gave a false impression of what was actually said. In both the case of the BBC and the Telegraph, the editing was misleading and sloppy. Trump used the term "fight" twenty times, and the term "peacefully" just once. During Trump's speech, his supporters chanted "Take the Capitol", "Invade the Capitol", "Storm the Capitol" and "Fight for Trump". In my opinion, the editing of the speech by the Telegraph is actually more misleading than the BBC. The jist of the speech was not one calling for calm, but one calling for supporters to fight: "...fight like hell and if you don't fight like hell, you're not going to have a country anymore". The Telegraph have not acknowledged their misleading editing / misquote of course. Trump has escaped punishment for his role in a violent insurrection. Many of the rioters who stormed the Capital have been let off / pardoned. The only people to have taken responsibility for anything, or to have faced any consequences for their behaviour, are the BBC. The BBC have apologised and both the BBC Director General and the News CEO have lost their jobs. They (we) also face a 1 billion dollar law suit from a corrupt, criminal, President (an unprecedented act from the supposed 'defender of free speech / the free world'). The idea that the BBC's errors are being 'swept under the carpet' is self evidently nonsense. It is very clear that the Telegraph would love to end the BBC, as would the Times etc. They are not motivated by a quest for truth. Neither is Trump (a firehose of BS). For Trump to be suing any media organisation as the sitting president of the United states, (let along a publicly owned UK broadcaster - effectively, the British taxpayer) is outrageous. That the whole country isn't telling him exactly where to go, shows a distinct lack of patriotism in my opinion. 
    • Trying to get to the bottom of the confusion. The events team email, the council website and the letter we all got through the door, says the consultations are this evening. I went along yesterday because it looks as though word of mouth had sent some people there on the wrong day (myself included). So not an error by the council on the date, but definitely a problem in letting people register their interest in attending. Hopefully that clears things up.
    • The ‘tree people’ conjures up a very Tolkienesque image.
    • I am hoping to find Furniture Risers, 4" or above. Needed to raise a bed and a sofa.  If you have any that you no longer need / wish to sell, please contact me by PM. Thank you  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...