Jump to content

Recommended Posts

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a bit of a leap, isn't it, to assume anyone

> who elects not to go for the anonymity option

> and/or published a blog has to be a "celebrity"

> seeker?

>

> SimonM (real name, as far as it goes :))



Maybe I am polarising things a bit.


How about notoriety seeker?


It seems Landcroft House is written by Rob from this forum. Unless there were two birthday cakes in one week at the Montpellier.

I have just seen this. I did as Jah says, set mine up in work one day for something to pass the time (I do have a lot of work that I could be doing, but you know). I have since done nothing to it, but may push on... I shall take the link away for the time being though, because if I'm not writing anything it seems pointless *ahem Huguenot*.


I'm not after fame, not from a blog anyway (musician perhaps, but aint gonna happen). Dulwichmum's is really well written, and good luck to her with the book(s), I think they'll do well.


The more interesting thing for me is the fact that I'm not posting anonymously. I have considered asking admin to change my name, as I do feel a bit exposed at times, and can't always slag off the people I want to because they might come and get me...


I'll let you know if I do any more blogging....

I write without a moniker but alas I am neither good looking/funny/interesting enough to seek fame, nor outrageous enough with my comments to seek notoriety.


I have no idea why I registered as myself to be honest. Probably because I couldn't think of a witty pseudonym.


If you're on Facebook you could probably find even more info about me, or MySpace, or my previous post about my own blog.


In the words of Catherine Tate, am I bovvered? Er, no.

Blogs are like papers. Read them, ignore them, have an opinion about them or don't. I'm not really a fan of any blog, but I do look at Landcroft House as I think it is well-written, informative and has high presentation values. On a related note, a writer in teh Spectator talks of 'blog-standard' in a recent edtion, by which he means that many blogs are written in a very similar, upbeat style of writing. I don't read enough to know whether it's correct, but it's an interesting thought. Nero


There are people in this world who think we are one and the same person you know....


As for the topic, isn't every post we make on here similar to a blog - It's just an opinion expressed and no-one HAS to read it


I tend to read blogs by people I know, just to see what's on their mind/what mood they were in when they wrote it - and that include our 3 bloggers mentioned here. I love 'em all


PS Alan - you are like Karter - you keep alluding to seeing me abaht (and have pinpointed my, er... habits) but I don't know you - so say hello sometime. If it's on the morning bus to work, leave it at that tho' (I can be anti-social at that hour....) ;-)

Sean I am afraid that I am unlikely to introduce myself either on the bus or in Inside 72 because I'm 'prone to insulting insinuations' so I 'feel the need to hide behind a nom de plume'.


Sorry.


Amanda - I love the stuff about only getting multiple orgasms off guys you don't respect intellectually. I know a couple of ladies who share your affliction in that department and I know of no cure.


I do think that if a middle aged guy was to post about only being interested in sex with stunning but stupid young girls that he has no interest in long term commitment with there may be a bit of a backlash.


What do you think? Do you have double standards about that sort of thing or would the old perve have your sympathies?

Keef that is the major downside about posting as yourself, you cannot post freely otherwise " they will come and get you" due to over exposure.


I admire your blog and posts, keep it up and dont change your name. Seeya around and thanks for keeping to your word. ;-)

I'm probably a bit more shy in person, but still there have been so many photos of nights out, and so many random meetings that there's not a lot of point posting under a different name.


Brendan

Keef

Mockney Piers

Ant

Mark

Michael P

Polly D

Georgia

Annasfield


To name but a few, are al brave and open... Trustworthy you might even say :-S

I am not seeking fame with my blog. I am simply a retired brickie from Penge with an active imagination... My blog provides me with a creative outlet, nothing more. I have an active imagination, and blogging helps me to spend less time smoking roll ups (Old Shag) and fawning over my snake/scorpion/great big hairy spider collection. I am hoping to sell the screen rights, and wish to turn Dulwich into the next Notting Hill - just to upset the locals.


Watch this space...

I thought a nom de plume was a necessity to post. Now I find it's not.


I am Ian Robert Whitehouse and I haven't had a drink for 24 hours - so I'm off for a glass of whisky bought this weekend in Scotland - an interesting blend of 3 cask strength Islay malts - 40% Laphroaig, 40% Bowmore and 20% Caol Ila. I may report back later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...