Jump to content

Recommended Posts

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Silly and a tad unhinged. This explains the

> oversensitivity to noise.


No it's the noise which has created the oversensitivity!



KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wow dude lay off the moron stuff it makes you come

> across real silly. I overslept. Again.


The lack of noise allowed you to sleep in?


ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is up there with the cycling threads.



Blimey anorak time.

Interesting...

Email this page Print this page

Runway resurfacing alters night-time flight patterns

Runway resurfacing is an essential maintenance task that comes round roughly once every decade. Last year we resurfaced the southern runway. During 2014, we'll be resurfacing the northern runway. Because Heathrow is so busy, this work needs to takes place at night.

That will mean changes to the pattern of night-time flights. From 23rd March to 31st October, most aircraft flying after 10.30pm and before 6am will use the southern runway.

Since Heathrow has relatively few night flights, the changes won't affect many aircraft ? mostly arrivals after 4.30am. There will be no additional night flights.

What does this mean for you?

If you live under the flight path for the southern runway, you'll experience more night-time aircraft noise than usual

If you live under the flight path for the northern runway, you'll experience less.

Interesting...


Runway resurfacing alters night-time flight patterns

Runway resurfacing is an essential maintenance task that comes round roughly once every decade. Last year we resurfaced the southern runway. During 2014, we'll be resurfacing the northern runway. Because Heathrow is so busy, this work needs to takes place at night.

That will mean changes to the pattern of night-time flights. From 23rd March to 31st October, most aircraft flying after 10.30pm and before 6am will use the southern runway.

Since Heathrow has relatively few night flights, the changes won't affect many aircraft ? mostly arrivals after 4.30am. There will be no additional night flights.

What does this mean for you?

If you live under the flight path for the southern runway, you'll experience more night-time aircraft noise than usual

If you live under the flight path for the northern runway, you'll experience less.



More here:http://www.heathrowairport.com/noise/noise-in-your-area/runway-resurfacing

Back to the noise.


Westerly operations today.


But flights must have been further north as the noise sounded 1/3 to 1/2 of last weeks levels, that could be down to wind direction but the wind is very light so probably not.


From 6.30 did noise did become more intrusive but right now 9.00am nothing ?


See flight path below shows many flight are not over ED but over the Thames this morning.


http://www.flightradar24.com/51.46,-0.17/13

picmicnic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure if this has been posted before but I

> recieved the following message for HACAN

> yesterday

>

> E-mail was entitled - Public Meetings on aircraft

> noise in SE London

>

> "Dear All,

>

> This is to let you know there are two meetings

> which have been organized by local residents in SE

> London re: Heathrow aircraft noise coming up.

> Apologies for the short notice re: the Greenwich

> one but we just heard about it at the end of last

> week.

>

> John Stewart

>

> HACAN

>

> 13th March, Public Meeting, 7.30 pm, Ashburnham

> Arms, Ashburnham Grove, Greenwich SE10 8UH

>

> Tuesday 18th March, Public Meeting, 7.30pm, and

> run till 9.30pm, Howell Hall, upstairs at St.

> John's Church, Brockley, London SE8 4EA. Right

> next to St John's train station. Heathrow Airport

> will be present at this one"


I'm abroad at the moment but I hear last Thursday's meeting was poorly attended.

Anyone going to Tuesday's?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fabfor Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I haven't trawled through the 288 previous

> > posts

> > > on this thread, so sorry if I'm going over

> old

> > > ground.

> > >

> > > But what exactly do those that have issues

> with

> > > the noise propose be done about it? And what

> > are

> > > the petitions petitioning for? Serious

> > questions.

> >

> > Serious questions deserve serious answers:

> >

> > get a secretary to research it for you or, if

> > you're really interested, do some footwork.

> > Otherwise, and for the umpteenth time, don't be

> a

> > "busybody".

>

>

> Thread on a public forum inviting people to have

> their say.

>

> I make first post on said thread asking what is

> being proposed because I really don't have time to

> read 288 posts, most of which will be petty

> arguing.

>

> Am called a busybody who is trying to derail a

> thread.

>

>

>

>

> Okay then.


AND NOW....


Re: Aircraft noise - have your say...

Posted by Otta Today, 10:31AM


Probably poorly attended because for most people this isn't a big problem.

....................................


Looks like I made a lucky guess, eh... Talk about a wolf in sheep's clothing.


Anyhow, I'd appreciate hearing about Tuesday's meeting, please.

Just back home in ED.

Drone central.

watching top gear and the aircraft noise is constant.

drone drone drone.. In the background constant rumble.



99% of people don't want to make a fuss about negative issues.


maybe the ostrich in them stops them from making a fuss.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • They're a supplement, usually made from whey, which are used after weight training. The theory is that weight training tears the muscle fibres (Feel The Burn, No Pain No Gain, etc), protein helps repair this and aid lean muscle growth. The faster you can get protein into your system, the better, so obviously liquids are absorbed faster than solids Beans, poached egg or peanut butter on toast, are pretty typical post training meals to achieve the same thing. They're much like a very thin milkshake or Slim fast, so nothing anabolic. I used them when I was training three or four times a week and the results were pretty good, if I do say so myself.   Cross-post with Ianr
    • On your last point jazzer, no. I've been reading around various aspects of them today.  The majority of them appear to be not much more than whey obtained from milk. That makes them about 75-80% protein. Have  a look at the H&B products.  They list all constituents. On the 18+ issue, OP, I suspect that what you noticed was probably at most a recommendation that they not be used by under-18s.  Even then, I only came across it on one website, by chance, when seeking for evidence of prohibitions:  https://ultimatesupsg.com/blogs/nutrition/whey-protein-should-individuals-under-the-age-of-18-take-whey-protein-to-build-muscle.
    • Simple question, why is a 16 year old taking protein powders? If they want to build up muscle, try using weights in the gym, doing it naturally.  Presumably  these powers are not natural products and more likely to be synthetic materials? 
    • tbh not impressed. I review restaurants and decided to give them benefit of the doubt that it was an off day and didn't write it up. There's a new restaurant by the Plough which I think is Turkish (where the strange French restaurant was many years ago). Planning to try that soon, if anyone has been let me know what you think./
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...