Jump to content

Recommended Posts

edcam Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Silly and a tad unhinged. This explains the

> oversensitivity to noise.


No it's the noise which has created the oversensitivity!



KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> wow dude lay off the moron stuff it makes you come

> across real silly. I overslept. Again.


The lack of noise allowed you to sleep in?


ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is up there with the cycling threads.



Blimey anorak time.

Interesting...

Email this page Print this page

Runway resurfacing alters night-time flight patterns

Runway resurfacing is an essential maintenance task that comes round roughly once every decade. Last year we resurfaced the southern runway. During 2014, we'll be resurfacing the northern runway. Because Heathrow is so busy, this work needs to takes place at night.

That will mean changes to the pattern of night-time flights. From 23rd March to 31st October, most aircraft flying after 10.30pm and before 6am will use the southern runway.

Since Heathrow has relatively few night flights, the changes won't affect many aircraft ? mostly arrivals after 4.30am. There will be no additional night flights.

What does this mean for you?

If you live under the flight path for the southern runway, you'll experience more night-time aircraft noise than usual

If you live under the flight path for the northern runway, you'll experience less.

Interesting...


Runway resurfacing alters night-time flight patterns

Runway resurfacing is an essential maintenance task that comes round roughly once every decade. Last year we resurfaced the southern runway. During 2014, we'll be resurfacing the northern runway. Because Heathrow is so busy, this work needs to takes place at night.

That will mean changes to the pattern of night-time flights. From 23rd March to 31st October, most aircraft flying after 10.30pm and before 6am will use the southern runway.

Since Heathrow has relatively few night flights, the changes won't affect many aircraft ? mostly arrivals after 4.30am. There will be no additional night flights.

What does this mean for you?

If you live under the flight path for the southern runway, you'll experience more night-time aircraft noise than usual

If you live under the flight path for the northern runway, you'll experience less.



More here:http://www.heathrowairport.com/noise/noise-in-your-area/runway-resurfacing

Back to the noise.


Westerly operations today.


But flights must have been further north as the noise sounded 1/3 to 1/2 of last weeks levels, that could be down to wind direction but the wind is very light so probably not.


From 6.30 did noise did become more intrusive but right now 9.00am nothing ?


See flight path below shows many flight are not over ED but over the Thames this morning.


http://www.flightradar24.com/51.46,-0.17/13

picmicnic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Not sure if this has been posted before but I

> recieved the following message for HACAN

> yesterday

>

> E-mail was entitled - Public Meetings on aircraft

> noise in SE London

>

> "Dear All,

>

> This is to let you know there are two meetings

> which have been organized by local residents in SE

> London re: Heathrow aircraft noise coming up.

> Apologies for the short notice re: the Greenwich

> one but we just heard about it at the end of last

> week.

>

> John Stewart

>

> HACAN

>

> 13th March, Public Meeting, 7.30 pm, Ashburnham

> Arms, Ashburnham Grove, Greenwich SE10 8UH

>

> Tuesday 18th March, Public Meeting, 7.30pm, and

> run till 9.30pm, Howell Hall, upstairs at St.

> John's Church, Brockley, London SE8 4EA. Right

> next to St John's train station. Heathrow Airport

> will be present at this one"


I'm abroad at the moment but I hear last Thursday's meeting was poorly attended.

Anyone going to Tuesday's?

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> fabfor Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Otta Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I haven't trawled through the 288 previous

> > posts

> > > on this thread, so sorry if I'm going over

> old

> > > ground.

> > >

> > > But what exactly do those that have issues

> with

> > > the noise propose be done about it? And what

> > are

> > > the petitions petitioning for? Serious

> > questions.

> >

> > Serious questions deserve serious answers:

> >

> > get a secretary to research it for you or, if

> > you're really interested, do some footwork.

> > Otherwise, and for the umpteenth time, don't be

> a

> > "busybody".

>

>

> Thread on a public forum inviting people to have

> their say.

>

> I make first post on said thread asking what is

> being proposed because I really don't have time to

> read 288 posts, most of which will be petty

> arguing.

>

> Am called a busybody who is trying to derail a

> thread.

>

>

>

>

> Okay then.


AND NOW....


Re: Aircraft noise - have your say...

Posted by Otta Today, 10:31AM


Probably poorly attended because for most people this isn't a big problem.

....................................


Looks like I made a lucky guess, eh... Talk about a wolf in sheep's clothing.


Anyhow, I'd appreciate hearing about Tuesday's meeting, please.

Just back home in ED.

Drone central.

watching top gear and the aircraft noise is constant.

drone drone drone.. In the background constant rumble.



99% of people don't want to make a fuss about negative issues.


maybe the ostrich in them stops them from making a fuss.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Has anyone had any joy getting refunds for their cancelled kids' swimming lessons? I am constantly just getting a 'computer says no' response from Dulwich Leisure - quite how they think its okay to charge £42.40 per child without a service being given is beyond me! I will try emailing Portia too...
    • Just to clarify, this isn't the same cherry as last year, it's in the corner by the path that runs down to the crossroads of FHR / Colyton / Dunstans. It hasn't been an issue previously because the perimeter wasn't as large... I'm sure it must have been noticed & flagged during the various planning meetings, walkabouts etc and there is an ecological resolution planned that will avoid any damage to the tree. After all, Gala pride themselves on their environmental stance, being "nestled in the park" and everything... 🤦
    • Those branches are going to get chopped...again. All of this shows the central paradox at the heart of Southwark's greening the streets policy. What is the good of planting trees in tarmac if you are simultaneously wrecking large sections of the park and stopping locals using the park? It just does not make sense. Cllr Catherine Rose should be made to answer for Gala conduct, if they are already flouting the terms of their agreement.
    • All, I have had bad experiences with scaffolders in the past. They have a hard job and sometimes damage your house by accident. The way they deal with it after this is usually what remains in their customers' minds...... and I have used a few different companies across last 12 years as a customer. I don't know if it is an exception, but I found LDS scaffolding's guys really good: Discrete, focused and on time. Their comms was ok. I have made sure I saved their contacts and will use them again. Prices felt fair. LEE GORE 07931642467  DEAN PRICE 07940531370  Olivier
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...