Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Did anyone else see a 20-something man with a bike on ground acting oddly amongst the bushes on the running track around outside of Dulwich Park 8.45-9.30? I ran past him three times in that time, twice doing same thing. I just thought he was a bit of a pervert until I saw the report about the attack in Avery Hill Park. There were loads of people around with the Park Run going on too.

Toosmart1973 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good grief!

>

> Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> the privacy of some foliage anymore without some

> self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly watching

> them??

>

> Whats the world coming to?



Maybe you should rename yourself Nottoosmart

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Toosmart1973 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good grief!

> >

> > Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> > the privacy of some foliage anymore without

> some

> > self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly

> watching

> > them??

> >

> > Whats the world coming to?

>

>

> Maybe you should rename yourself Nottoosmart



HA, ha, ha.....thats brilliant, you Mr Mick Max, are a very funny person indeed!, have you considered stand up?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Toosmart1973 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good grief!

> >

> > Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> > the privacy of some foliage anymore without

> some

> > self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly

> watching

> > them??


Haha, was totally thinking the same thing lol - hadn't crossed my mind he was perverted, sounds like good old fashioned cruising to me, how old school. Best just ignored, chances are if you're not interested he won't be either.

Sorry, I don't understand some of these comments - a man has been exposing himself (and reading between the lines a lot more than just exposing himself) in broad daylight, at a time when the park will be full of families etc, to at least two lone females and this should just be ignored or laughed off as some sort of "old school" behaviour? Seriously?
Thats the problem with this site pepole make up things who said that he was exposing himself and then was called a pervert for doing what does say anything about showing any part of his body,so grow up and stop saying things that are not facts...com

I'll answer you despite the fact that anyone who says "grow up" and "facts...com" doesn't really deserve a reply. muppet19 said the man was behaving oddly and later clarified this as "lewd stuff." OK, she didn't actually use the words exposing himself. Big deal. Still don't think there's anything amusing about it.


ETA What is mildly amusing, when you think about it, is that you're getting het up about the fact that a person who was behaving in enough of a sexually inappropriate manner in the park for the OP to call the police might be slandered by me making a (perfectly justifiable) assumption as to what that behaviour was. Interesting sense of priorities.

Beej Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> she said "acting oddly amongst the bushes" she

> didn't actually say exposing himself. Apologies, i

> just found Toosmart1973 comment amusing.


Then below that said "Lewd Behaviour" - which is actually a definition of illegal sexual behaviour.


And we did take it as a joke back in time - the local flasher was a running joke amongst the schoolgirls at my school - but seen as progressive behaviour towards worse these days.

Take Note Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's Mick Mac, @Toosmart1973. Really not that

> smart.

>

> Who says (anything) .com?



Brilliant! You've copied the earlier pun on my name!.....you must go down a storm in your local pub or WI meetings?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...