Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Did anyone else see a 20-something man with a bike on ground acting oddly amongst the bushes on the running track around outside of Dulwich Park 8.45-9.30? I ran past him three times in that time, twice doing same thing. I just thought he was a bit of a pervert until I saw the report about the attack in Avery Hill Park. There were loads of people around with the Park Run going on too.

Toosmart1973 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good grief!

>

> Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> the privacy of some foliage anymore without some

> self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly watching

> them??

>

> Whats the world coming to?



Maybe you should rename yourself Nottoosmart

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Toosmart1973 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good grief!

> >

> > Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> > the privacy of some foliage anymore without

> some

> > self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly

> watching

> > them??

> >

> > Whats the world coming to?

>

>

> Maybe you should rename yourself Nottoosmart



HA, ha, ha.....thats brilliant, you Mr Mick Max, are a very funny person indeed!, have you considered stand up?

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Toosmart1973 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Good grief!

> >

> > Can a grown man not innocently 'rub one out' in

> > the privacy of some foliage anymore without

> some

> > self absorbed fitness fanatic pervertedly

> watching

> > them??


Haha, was totally thinking the same thing lol - hadn't crossed my mind he was perverted, sounds like good old fashioned cruising to me, how old school. Best just ignored, chances are if you're not interested he won't be either.

Sorry, I don't understand some of these comments - a man has been exposing himself (and reading between the lines a lot more than just exposing himself) in broad daylight, at a time when the park will be full of families etc, to at least two lone females and this should just be ignored or laughed off as some sort of "old school" behaviour? Seriously?
Thats the problem with this site pepole make up things who said that he was exposing himself and then was called a pervert for doing what does say anything about showing any part of his body,so grow up and stop saying things that are not facts...com

I'll answer you despite the fact that anyone who says "grow up" and "facts...com" doesn't really deserve a reply. muppet19 said the man was behaving oddly and later clarified this as "lewd stuff." OK, she didn't actually use the words exposing himself. Big deal. Still don't think there's anything amusing about it.


ETA What is mildly amusing, when you think about it, is that you're getting het up about the fact that a person who was behaving in enough of a sexually inappropriate manner in the park for the OP to call the police might be slandered by me making a (perfectly justifiable) assumption as to what that behaviour was. Interesting sense of priorities.

Beej Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> she said "acting oddly amongst the bushes" she

> didn't actually say exposing himself. Apologies, i

> just found Toosmart1973 comment amusing.


Then below that said "Lewd Behaviour" - which is actually a definition of illegal sexual behaviour.


And we did take it as a joke back in time - the local flasher was a running joke amongst the schoolgirls at my school - but seen as progressive behaviour towards worse these days.

Take Note Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's Mick Mac, @Toosmart1973. Really not that

> smart.

>

> Who says (anything) .com?



Brilliant! You've copied the earlier pun on my name!.....you must go down a storm in your local pub or WI meetings?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thanks for all of the thoughts. I have a letter from searches which outlines the scope of work but doesn't mention any work guarantee as far as I can see. I agree that next step is to check directly with the major works team. Tim .
    • I thoroughly recommend Jay from JK Electrical Contractors who is an NICEIC registered. NICEIC is the UK's leading certification body for the electrical contracting industry and conducts regular audits and assessments on all its members. It is the specialist trade body which certifies professional electricians.  Jay completed the installation of a 19 way consumer unit for us and works to the highest standards and our entire electrical installation is now fully compliant with 18th Edition of the electrical wiring regulations. Before installing the new CU he traced and corrected faults that had developed over the last 25 years -some of which were my DIY bodges that were non-compliant.  We now have an installation that is 100% safe and  reliable . His contact details are :- 0208 150 6450 [email protected] Here is what he installed for us.
    • I fully support this petition, however it will need to be shared far & wide to be effective. Also there is always a huge amount of interest / objection during the festival, but not so much when they start consulting for the next one, usually around January. It's crucial that everyone that has been impacted makes their voice heard then.  A couple of points which may be good to include in the wording (if it is still possible to amend?) - The total tickets sold are way more than 3000. The licence allows a capacity of up to 9,999, but this may include staff & performers etc. The published attendance for 2024 was:  Friday – 8,999 / Saturday – 9,512 / Sunday – 9,422 So that's c.28,000 people trampling & littering our park over three days - people who have no need or desire to take any care or consideration of our park.  - Gala claim for 2024 that "62% of all ticket holders were from Southeast London and 18% of these were from hyper-local postcode areas SE15 and SE22." So a bit of maths shows that means that around 89% of attendees were not what most people would term 'local'... - Gala have ambitions / plans to extend the number of event days to 6, over two weekends. They applied for a licence for this in 2024, but then withdrew it. Instead they added a "free" event, billed as a community day, to the existing 3 day festival, thereby increasing the event days to 4.  This would appear to be an attempt to set a precedent for increasing the number of event days, and it's inevitable that they will attempt to secure the 6 days they desire for 2026, to increase their profits further. Two weekends in a row of noise, disturbance & disruption would be unacceptable, plus an extra c.18,000 trampling & littering the park... - The site size has been increased. The claim is that it is to compensate for lost storage space due to recent flood alleviation works, but the area has increased by more than the area lost, and appears to have been used for attendee activity rather than site storage. Gala have often stated that the festival can only be located in the park because the footprint has been designed specifically for that area, and yet this year the footprint had been amended & extended without any apparent issues. Surely this proves that it could be relocated?  Apologies, I just can't help going into rant mode on this issue, but hopefully some of the above may be helpful in increasing the argument presented by the petition?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...