Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think death should be automatically accorded respect.


Most of the OBL concerns were about an enlightened democracy committing extrajudicial execution surely, not against those celebrating his death, for who can blame them.

My father popped a cork of champagne literally over the funeral cortege of Franco on it's way to the Valley of The Fallen.

Likewise I've been happy to raise a small glass of sherry or at least a smile at the deaths of Pol Pot, General Pinochet, Milosevic and a few others.


Get real people, this is Thatcher, I was no fan, but she's hardly in that league. Fair enough if your son was on the Belgrano, the rest of you should be ashamed frankly.

Huguenot you are wrong in this one respect. The company my father worked for was a profitable company. There was absolutely no reason for it to be deregulated, privatised and then downsized (for nothing more thsn the maximisation of profit).


If it was deregularised, privatised and downsized in the 80s the company must have been in the public sector. Very few such company's were making real profits from their revenues - many more were strangled by unionism that prevented effective management and change to enable them to make real profits. Their products were uncompetitive in the world market. There were many "companies" in the public sector that were being subsidised by the public purse as an alternative to recognising that they had no real commercial future in their existing form. The fact that a major downsizing occurred in the company where your father worked would indicate that there was fat in the system.


Businesses do not cut their own throats - they maximise profits, it's the nature of the beast. They retain good, willing and supportive staff, they cut activities and staff that do not, in some fashion, contribute to the bottom line.


I'm not suggesting your father deserved to be made redundant but to blame his redundancy on Lady Thatcher is illogical. She saw the decline in Britain, enacted policies that halted and then reversed the decline. The fact that much Britain's industrial base was in the North, was nationalised and had had little real investment since the 30s was not her fault - some blame can be laid at the door of the company owners in the 30s that failed to invest in their businesses, but from 1945 it was successive governments that declined to invest effectively - resulting in high cost / low quality products, the fallout had to happen at some stage.


In 1979 the government was operating airlines, coalmines, steelmaking works, telecomms, car manufacturing, railways, shipbuilding; almost all, if not all, at a loss. Today they operate none of these enterprises and yet our taxes are as high as they were in the 70s. If they were all still under government control either taxes would have be significantly higher for everyone, or we would have to forego other government services that we value - the NHS, Social Services, Police, Defence - and in all likelihood both would apply. High taxes, lousy public services.

Not as many as you think KK and what a great policy that was, because now 25 years on we have a housing market that has a dire shortage of social and affordable housing.


MP....I can perfectly understand why many will not be sad to see Thatcher die. It's not because they are shameful but because she affected them or their families lives in a way they find hard to forgive. At the end of the day she and her cabinet had little compassion for them.

I got made redundant due to the cuts recently. I don't hate Cameron, I just dusted myself off and got on with it.

You revel in someone's death when they tortured or dissappeared your loved ones, not because they did you out of a job.

Some of the hyperbole on here is little short of pathetic.

DJKQ - I don't have a view as to how many people bought cheap council property as tenants, I just know it was a 'lot', so you can't say my term is incorrect because I haven't quantified it !


The policy was obviously rubbish, that's not my point.

My point is there are a lot of people who made decent money directly as a result of 'Thatcher' (her Govt's policies), having never earned and saved for it. I speak as someone, previously slightly bitter about it, who has worked his balls off since day 1 with no handouts, watching many relatives with zero drive and ambition fill-up due to such policies, while I worked 3 years 40 hours a week while at Uni. I'm glad I did what I did, but if I'd benefitted to the tune of 10's of ?1000's I would not be resenting Lady Thatcher's demise.

So, I'm saying a lot of people benefitted and shouldn't have cause to celebrate her death !


One thing about Thatcher I admired though - you could never say to her 'grow a pair' (both metaphorically and literally), which is more than can be said for PM's since.

It was a profitable company and the result was that a good service was replaced by a terrible understaffed service. I don't deny something had to change (after the decline as you rightly say since the second world war) but they replaced it with NOTHING, in the misguided belief that the free market would take care of it. Millions of people left the North - they had to (I was one of them). And nothing typified their lack of compassion more than Tebbits 'get on your bike' speech. And you are right, the following labour government didn't do enough either in that respect.


Downsizing though in many cases is simply about minimising costs and maximising profits and there was no minimum wage (something else that government vehently opposed).

DJKQ I think it was beyond the Govts abilities to finance a complete restructure of Industries across the North, so "get on your bike", though harsh, had an element of reality about it. I experienced a similar journey as you to London from home, though from IOW, after losing work 3 times in a year. In the unemployed folks' hostel I lived before leaving IOW which I shared with skins and punks who HATED Thatcher/Tory, there was vehement anger at the state of things, but I knew and didn't expect jobs to be brought to me so I went to where they were. That's real life isn't it - surely ?

But MP you are an intelligent guy, probably with a good education, qualifications etc and used to a flexible jobs market. If you were a 50 something man living in a small town with a family who had worked in one industry for life, with not many formal qualifications then it isn't so easy. That typified the kind of worker most affected by that era. There was absolutely no forethought as to what would become of these people. Micheal Hesaltine was perhaps the only cabinet member that tried to do something and Thatcher hated him ultimately.


Even today, most 50 something's made redundent find themselves on the scrapheap.


You are absolutely right KK that many made a lot of money but the world has never been fair in that repsect by rewarding hard work and talent in equal measure. My honest opinion is that fiscally they had essentially the right policies but went too far to the right - and that was more about ideology than good economics. In other words, good wealth creation, but poor distribution. For policies like clause 28 though, they had no excuses.

It's real life KK but only something that the young and mobile can really adapt to. There are many people that can't move, for many good reasons. And a good society is one that is balanced, fair, and has a certain level of compassion. We are a wealthy country and shouldn't have or be failing on some of the things we do. Opportunity isn't something that should only belong to the young and mobile.

There seems to be a growing, but not yet definitive, consensus that much of what was achieved by Lady Thatcher and Conservative administrations '79 - '89 was necessary and correct. That more might have been done, that Clause 28 was stupid, that some of the 80s excesses were over the top can also be agreed.


I would however, back that decade to be viewed by political, economic and social historians as one of the most effective and successful of the post WWII years.

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I always rather admired the old bag


I must admit a somewhat grudging respect for her as well. She was a leader - you may not have liked where she was taking the country but you knew damn well what her strategy and direction was. And you knew who was in charge.


Compare and contrast with the wishy-washy, go-where-the-wind-blows, rudderless "leaders" we've had since.

I actually quite liked Major (despite not being a Tory).

Spitting Image had a ridiculously powerful ability to govern how we viewed the political characters of the day (and I think we could do with something like that today more than ever), but he was unfairly maligned as first a thatcher controlled robot then a grey pea obsessed meek fool.

At then end of the day he was the last decent (in the more important moral sense of the word) politician we had in that role.

Their sleaze was good comedy sleaze. The labour sleaze was just, well... sleazey.


Always remember the Spitting Image, where they had Major and his cabinet dressed as hippies singing "Come gather round people, black white or grey. An exciting new dawn isn't happening today".

:)) I'm glad that we're geeting to fonder memories.


I've a voting record that goes Conservative, Labour, Lib Dem. I didn't get the chance to vote in '79 or '83, but it would have been Conservative and would have been Maggie.


I tend to agree with Marmora Man - it's not the business of government to 'own' jobs. I think it's the role of government to create a stable, efficient and effective economic environment to encourage jobs - and to create public services that may entail employing people - but not to own airlines and gas companies.


Tatcher's era was a painful period for many, but so were the 70s.

bodsier Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> what's wrong with death anyway? if you believe in

> karma, she has another chance to redeem herself.

> Who knows who she might be when she/he/it comes

> back......


She might come back as a miner. Or a minor.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
    • Can’t imagine what it must be like you have your doorbell rung harshly.
    • Hi all, Wondering if anyone else in/around SE22 is also having the unfortunate luck of having Evri parcels delivered by a very rude individual? Whenever we have parcels delivered, our front gate is being slammed open and closed, ring doorbell is harshly banged (not pressed) followed by simultaneously banging on the door knocker and slamming the letter box multiple times. Someone is normally home by the time they come in the evening and never has to wait long for an answer. If we’re not home, we speak to them on the doorbell so we do find the actions of this individual unreasonable and rude.  We have tried a couple of times politely asking that they not do this but they are very dismissive and gives a passive-aggressive “have a nice day” reply.  Has anyone been able to contact Evri and successfully had any issues similar to this resolved? We have enough evidence through our doorbell footage but we are lost with what else we can do. We’ve tried asking politely but don’t want our gate or door damaged by someone who simply doesn’t care and lacks basic manners.    If anyone else is having this issue or has any advice on how we can report this, it would be much appreciated. After another dismissive reply to my concern this afternoon, I will be calling Evri tomorrow to raise a complaint. I have lost my patience with them 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...