Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Marmora Man Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's worthy of note that, 30 year papers have

> revealed, that the UK gov't at the time of the

> hunger strikes was making overtures to address

> some of IRA demand in order to allow the IRA to

> call off the hunger strikes - these were rejected

> by the IRA. I assume as they preferred to have

> martyrs for a cause that a negotiated concession

> to their demands.


This is accurate to some extent.


In fact the pre 1969 rank and file were constantly expressing doubt about the effectiveness of the hunger strikes for such narrow objectives.

Thatcher was steadfast because the IRA broke her heart with Airey Neave. There was no meaningful negotiation with the hunger strikers (MM ? ). There was an offer which was patronising to the prisioners. They gave their lives for something better.


Living in London I respect Thatcher enormously for turning the country from backward to.forward. But in northern ireland she divided a people that were already divided. Other people stepped in afterwards and made a difference. Thatcher was too stubborn to solve Ireland.

According to Wikipedia, the demands by the hunger strikers were:


1) the right not to wear a prison uniform;

2) the right not to do prison work;

3) the right of free association with other prisoners, and to organise educational and recreational pursuits;

4) the right to one visit, one letter and one parcel per week;

5) full restoration of remission lost through the protest.


Really? Surely there was more to it than just this?

These guys were involved in an armed campaign that involved the mass slaughter of innocent citizens in the name of crimes committed centuries earlier and persistent social injustices.


Whatever they may have claimed, I doubt that they were just having a moan over not being able to wear jeans.

I thought it was over political prisioner status similar to rights of POW as opposed to criminal status. This was something Thatcher would not bend on. They refused to wear prison clothes or slop out. They then died for what they believed. Thatcher did what she thought was right. Not surprisingly she made things worse in the long term. She soon signed the Anglo Irish agreement to solve things in the long term as she had had enough grief from the whole Ireland issue.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But it was under our electoral system in 2019! This must be part of the right-wing media conspiracy that did for Corbyn....;-) Corbyn was very closely allied to Unite and Len....
    • Goose Green Ward Panel Meeting   Date: 24th of July 2025, 7pm Location: East Dulwich Picturehouse | 116A Lordship Lane | London SE22 8HD    Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) will be holding a ward panel meeting at East Dulwich Picturehouse on Thursday 24th July 2025 from 7pm. Please come along to talk about the priorities for the community and how local police can help.  
    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...