Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Is is just me or does anyone else get really, really irritated by flagrant displays of poor grammar in places that really should know better. I realise that I'm turning into one of those smug middle class types, or worse still my mother, but is it really so hard to know when to use an apostrophe?? So there's a certain chemist on Melbourne Grove that offers passport photo's (not sure whose photos they are) and a certain adventure playground in Peckham Rye that is open on Sunday's.


Name and shame I say. Sorry if it really is just me!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17244-apostrophe-police/
Share on other sites

The above book is nothing short of pompous! I'm all for good grammar but when it's used as a means of overt snobbery, it stinks.

Truss has very little in life to worry about if the odd apostrophe here and there is enough to bring her to her knees. Standards must be kept etc but many shop-signs for example, might have been written by people who didn't benefit from the same kind of education she had.

womanofdulwich Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I assume you have already read "Eats shoots and

> leaves" it comes with a set of apostrophe stickers

> etc.


There aren't many books which make you want to go on a murderous rampage in Waterstones - but this is one of them.


Do us a favour, Truss.. sod off.

Maybe there is a connection in life to paying attention to the details. Maybe education doesn't bring privilege but enhances the prospect of success. Maybe those willing to be educated (and anyone who went to school until the age of oooh 14 should know where to put an apostrophe) stand a better chance


Or maybe it's easier to piss around in class and then complain when life doesn't treat you fairly

I assume you have already read "Eats shoots and leaves" it comes with a set of apostrophe stickers etc


I managed about half a chapter of this before I threw it away in disgust. Bad grammar gets my attention but doesn't usually bother me. However, in a book that purports to be about correct grammar and fragrantly disregards the rules, it is nothing short of hypocrisy.

willow Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is is just me or does anyone else get really,

> really irritated by flagrant displays of poor

> grammar in places that really should know better.

> I realise that I'm turning into one of those smug

> middle class types, or worse still my mother, but

> is it really so hard to know when to use an

> apostrophe?? So there's a certain chemist on

> Melbourne Grove that offers passport photo's (not

> sure whose photos they are) and a certain

> adventure playground in Peckham Rye that is open

> on Sunday's.

>

> Name and shame I say. Sorry if it really is just

> me!


The use of an apostrophe to indicate possession (Fred's shoe) is to replace missing letters (as in don't) from the original phrase (Fred his shoe or the King his sword). Perhaps then there should be a female version e.g. Sue her shoes would become Sue'r shoes. Or is that just misleading and perjorative?


(What really bites is multiple question/exclamation marks!!)


edited to avoid repetition!!

"passport photo's" is actually correct, apostrophe-wise, as it is an abbreviation of "passport photographs"


--------------------

SimonM


'Fraid not SimonM. If it were correct you'd write photo (singular) as photo'. So, passport photo's is not only incorrect as the plural but meaningless.


(Edited as I confused myself)

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Can I join in by whingeing about a well-known

> Lordship Lane business who can't spell its own

> products in the many hand-lettered signs outside

> the shop?


But I do like the Holy Wreaths you get before Christmas. More pious than most Christmas goods

'Fraid not SimonM. If it were correct you'd write photo (singular) as photo'.


I demur. These days "photo" and "photograph" are effectively two different words: so there is no need for an apostrophe for "photo" in the singular. "Photo's" on the other hand is quite defensible as an abbreviation of "photographs"....:))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Nope. I don’t have this wrong. I’ve tried to put my point across respectfully, and explain that I understand the nuance of editing, story-telling and reporting better than many, without resorting to personal, angry insults. And all my colleagues agree that the BBC got this right in its condemnation.    All you see is confirmation bias.    If you don’t realise that, then you’re part of the problem.    
    • We have always gone during the week at lunch time - great place and good value. Husband has been several times on his own and owner knows his first name. I could not go one time for some reason and she sent him home with some spring rolls (free)
    • We did but they would not budge.   Anyway this was last year - things may have changed and staff may be different. It was a man who served us.
    • Because some people have weird fake beliefs and when people point out just how fake by pointing at actual events the fake people get all huffy and say “this is why “ make your argument instead of repeating  nonsense - why am I wrong? Because what you have said doesn’t make that argument  or admit you might have this wrong  Which words on my last post are false or make you not post? What is the problem ? Someone posts: “You don't know what you're talking about, Sephiroth,” and I reply with that happened.  And this same person the responds with “this is why people don’t post on the forum anymore !” like - they were rude  to and dismissive of me, right?  But I’m the bad guy? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...