Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Giggs may be a sucessful musician but his music is rubbish and way over-rated.. He's not even close to the best hip hop and rap artists at the moment. His latest mixtape is free to download for a reason. Compare that to the latest mixtape from Manchester based RIO and Stylus (who write about the same stuff as Giggs). You can soon see who have the talent and it's not Giggs.

They'd probably be pretty pissed off about it, but they looked pretty inoffensive to me.


I'm sure they could get wound up as a gang, as any group of lads could, but they weren't behaving in an overtly aggressive manner. Even the trigger-finger pose was gentle.


They probably egg each other on to do daft things, but then so did I when I was a kid. I'd just try and make sure they didn't have access to lethal weapons when they did it.


Nice technical work, demonstrating a bit of effort and application.


Not sure there's any threat to society here.

I don't know a lot about hiphop but I thought that Giggs seems like an intelligent guy in that clip and his music sounded quite good. The Dulwich guys sound pretty good too. At least they are trying to do something positive about their lives even if their lyrics are a bit hyped up.

The thing about good hip hop artists is that they write about stuff that is real. Most of the pre 90's rap coming out of detroit, chicago, new york and LA emerged from those growing up in neighbourhoods where decent healthcare, education, housing etc wasn't available to them. Where the Police daily harassed the occupants of those neighbourhoods with little care for the rights of those people and where drugs and violent crime were the only option it seemed to many young men there.


Even post 80's, when Eminem wrote about 8 mile he was writing about the place he grew up in.


The problem with a lot of these kids today is that they are emulating not creating. They have plenty of opportunity to stay away from drugs and crime. They are not deprived of good health care or education. In turn what they rap about is the kind of fantasy that many with low self-esteem seem to rap about....how tough they are, and how much crime they can do, and how far they'll go to bully you into having repsect for their talentless little asses. None of them are JayZ, Dizzee Rascal or Plan B and never will be.

And you Otta have no idea what you are taking about either. How many members of So Solid Crew ended up in prison for example???? Sure some kids are just making music, others though are making music as an extension to their so called 'gang lifestyle'. And anyway......I think any kid that thinks there any merit in making music about killing and robbing people needs their head testing.

Dj sums it up well I think Otta.


Most hip hop these days IS this type of bully-boy drivel, and its made by kids who aspire to the "thug life" idea that 50 cent sold them.


If you actually understand the lyrics, I dont see how you can say this is just kids having fun.

Nope - i still can't get past


"The problem with a lot of these kids today".


It's too good.


Of course lyrics have always been problematic. When Elvis sang jailhouse rock, and the line


"Number 47 said to Number 3

you're the cutest jailbird I ever did see"


Where was the condemnation of prison rape???


context people, context

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nope - i still can't get past

>

> "The problem with a lot of these kids today".



Be fair - this line has since been backdated to reflect the knowing, irony-laden cool that was absolutely definitely originally intended.. yes, honestly it was.. no really.

Oh C'mon Elvis is not comparable to ganster rap. You are right Otto, many of these kids are rapping about something they'll never do but how sad that they only way they think they can look tough is by singing about killing and bullying people.


There are though several real teenage gangs, who are involved with crime, that are making this kind of music too. Social media has made it possible for these gangs to be organised and recruit through fear. It's a layer that many adults don't see but if you are a teenager in many parts of South London (and elsewhere) you will be fully aware of who the local organised gang (or group of bullies as I prefer to call them) are. You will also be aeware that they'll steal your phone and will probably be carrying knives. And yes there have always been bullies and teenage theives but not on the level there are today, nor in the level of violence they are prepared to use. And some will grow out of it and others won't.

The problem with a lot of these kids today making this kind of music.....does that help? Because I really can't understand what on earth the issue is with that statement. But then hey, we only run youth clubs and programmes through my TRA and work with the Police and youth services to do what we can to keep kids away from crime and carrying knives (and not always successfully because half of them are on probation) so what do I know about those kinds of young people?

"Oh C'mon Elvis is not comparable to ganster rap."


tell that to prisoner #3!





Bugger, there goes my Johnny Cash records too. Shooting a man in Reno.. not because he HAD to, the self-defence option, but because JC just wanted to see him die


Bloody irresponsible if you ask me


But think about - DJKQ has a clue in her own name, or does Killa mean something else?


i don't think any of us need lectures about gang culture in SE London. We can see the evidence daily. But pointing at lyrics in songs as a sign of delinquency is as old as the hills. Footloose was a parable you know...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
    • I perceive the problem.simply as spending too much without first shoring up the economy.  If the government had reduced borrowing,  and as much as most hate the idea, reduced government deiartment spending (so called austerity) and not bowed to union pressures for pay rises, then encouraged businesses to grow, extra cash would have entered the coffers and at a later stage when the economy was in a stronger position rises in NI or taxes would have a lesser impact, but instead Reeves turned that on its head by increasing ni which has killed growth, increased prices and shimmied the economy.  What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???     
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...