Jump to content

Stranded car at entrance to Crawthew Grove

worldwiser

By worldwiser
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

DulwichFox

DulwichFox

Posted
Posted

From this angle it would seem the car completely missed the entrance to the Road and Mounted the pavement.




This keeps on happening here and elsewhere where these Bell shaped Low bollards are being used. IE Ady's Rd.


Drivers cannot see them. In this case the car appears to of mounted the pavement



DulwichFox

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> KidKruger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ?have?

>

> Pedant.. You cannot help yourself. Get a life.


You appear to have struck a particularly rich vein of irony today DF, even by your standards.

IlonaM

IlonaM

Posted
Posted

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > KidKruger Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > ?have?

> >

> > Pedant.. You cannot help yourself. Get a life.

>

> You appear to have struck a particularly rich vein

> of irony today DF, even by your standards.



Oh, I'd be pretty p'd off if someone corrected me after a long day as well. It wasn't really necessary, especially given some of the howlers I see on the Forum.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

IlonaM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Oh, I'd be pretty p'd off if someone corrected me

> after a long day as well. It wasn't really

> necessary, especially given some of the howlers I

> see on the Forum.


Indeed, but DF is the #1 corrector of others hereabouts.

IlonaM

IlonaM

Posted
Posted

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> IlonaM Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Oh, I'd be pretty p'd off if someone corrected

> me

> > after a long day as well. It wasn't really

> > necessary, especially given some of the howlers

> I

> > see on the Forum.

>

> Indeed, but DF is the #1 corrector of others

> hereabouts.


Even I am tempted occasionally, but I have to tell myself to resist!

herne hilly

herne hilly

Posted
Posted

i started reading this and thought the same as someone previously, how lovely everyone was being, but then everyone went straight to pre judging the poor driver. I hope she is ok, as it must have been quite frightening.


From my own driving around south london, is that people have NO patience what so ever and some drivers will be beeping like crazy which can panic/fluster people. Things like turning out of side roads, or allowing on coming cars down a narrow road.

Personally , i take no notice of these impatient drivers and only go when i think its safe, its always just a few seconds, but everyone is in such a hurry because there is so much traffic !

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

herne hilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i started reading this and thought the same as

> someone previously, how lovely everyone was being,

> but then everyone went straight to pre judging the

> poor driver. I hope she is ok, as it must have

> been quite frightening.

>

> From my own driving around south london, is that

> people have NO patience what so ever and some

> drivers will be beeping like crazy which can

> panic/fluster people. Things like turning out of

> side roads, or allowing on coming cars down a

> narrow road.

> Personally , i take no notice of these impatient

> drivers and only go when i think its safe, its

> always just a few seconds, but everyone is in such

> a hurry because there is so much traffic !


Fair point - I'm in no way a fan of the motor car and am the first to castigate bad drivers, but for all we know this person could have swerved to avoid a child who'd run into the road or been forced off line by someone else's bad driving.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> And I certainly do not correct others for their

> Grammar.


Just for everything else, and frequently erroneously.


P.S. I haven't corrected your grammar, I'm just laughing at your pompously ironic reaction.

Willard

Willard

Posted
Posted

herne hilly Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> i started reading this and thought the same as

> someone previously, how lovely everyone was being,

> but then everyone went straight to pre judging the

> poor driver. I hope she is ok, as it must have

> been quite frightening.

>


You have to be doing something seriously wrong and driving fast to get your car stuck up there. Was the driver a woman? That seems a bit of a pre-judgment! I walked past the aftermath yesterday and it looked like the driver was a man. (very happy to be corrected if you know otherwise)

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

With all respect DF, I'm not in the habit of picking people up on their grammar (in this case it's actually spelling, because you mistakenly typed 'of' instead of 'have'. No-one would intentionally use a wrong word like that).


Fact is, I have suffered years of this abuse, by reading occurrences of 'have' displaced by 'of'.

It unnerves me greatly, affects my concentration and shatters my senses - all in one go.

At last I speak out about it and I'm branded a troublemaker. This is not OK.

I suggest the most efficient (and environmentally friendly, if you include your community here on EDF) solution is to stop swapping 'of' for 'have'. It's been some years now but is a lesson which can be learned very quickly.

'Try it, you'll like it', as the person serving Socrates said.


Sorry to side track they thread, but let's face it, the thread is pretty much done. A car crashed, no-one hurt, car removed, traffic resumes, oil patch to be mopped-up soon. Sort of run it's course wouldn't you say ?

'Hi-Jacked' is too strong a word, I'd prefer "used the opportunity to finally (after years of courteous restraint) educate someone about their repeated transcription error when typing".

In the long run, victims like me would be spared repeated trauma if you'd just respect the reader and type properly.

'It's just not cricket', as the person playing snooker once said.

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

edcam: weeeeell, the 'hi-jacked' was a quote (yes, I KNOW, quoted things should have quotes !!).



Sue: I'm not inclined to agree I'm afraid. It's denotes ownership, in my sentence. "It's course" (the course belonging to the thread).


Keep at it though....!

edcam

edcam

Posted
Posted

I knew that KK, don't worry.


However, I'm with Sue. "Its " is the correct possessive pronoun, not "it's", which is only short for "it is" or "it has".


It's a bit like "his" or "hers", a possessive pronoun all of its own.


A common mistake but a mistake nonetheless.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Sue: I'm not inclined to agree I'm afraid. It's

> denotes ownership, in my sentence. "It's course"

> (the course belonging to the thread).

>

> Keep at it though....!


No no no no no KK! It's can only ever be an abbreviation for it is/has. The possessive for the pronoun it never takes an apostrophe. To be fair this is a concept that many find difficult, I've probably spent more time as a teacher explaining that than any other rule.

rendelharris

rendelharris

Posted
Posted

spider69 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> After pupils never understood, is that why you

> gave up teaching?


They did understand, thanks, the reasons I quit teaching had nothing to do with the pupils.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Agreed and in the meantime its "joe public" who has to pay through higher prices. We're talking all over the shop from food to insurance and everything in between.  And to add insult to injury they "hurt " their own voters/supporters through the actions they have taken. Sadly it gets to a stage where you start thinking about leaving London and even exiting the UK for good, but where to go????? Sad times now and ahead for at least the next 4yrs, hence why Govt and Local Authorities need to cut spending on all but essential services.  An immediate saving, all managerial and executive salaries cannot exceed and frozen at £50K Do away with the Mayor of London, the GLA and all the hanging on organisations, plus do away with borough mayors and the teams that serve them. All added beauracracy that can be dispensed with and will save £££££'s  
    • CPR Dave
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By CPR Dave · Posted

      The minimum wage hikes on top of the NICs increases have also caused vast swathes of unemployment.
    • HeadNun
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      Exactly - a snap election will make things even worse. Jazzer - say you get a 'new' administration tomorrow, you're still left with the same treasury, the same civil servants, the same OBR, the same think-tanks and advisors (many labour advisors are cross-party, Gauke for eg). The options are the same, no matter who's in power. Labour hasn't even changed the Tories' fiscal rules - the parties are virtually economically aligned these days.  But Reeves made a mistake in trying too hard, too early to make some seismic changes in her first budget as a big 'we're here and we're going to fix this mess, Labour to the rescue' kind of thing . They shone such a big light on the black hole that their only option was to try to fix it overnight. It was a comms clusterfuck.  They'd perhaps have done better sticking to Sunak's quiet, cautious approach, but they knew the gullible public was expecting an 24-hour turnaround miracle.  The NIC hikes are a disaster, I think they'll be reversed soon and enough and they'll keep trying till they find something that sticks.   
    • jazzer
      Is Rachel Reeves becoming the new Liz Truss?

      By jazzer · Posted

      Totally agree with you.  🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...