Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So, the first Friday of November is 2nd of November which is the start of the Bonfire night weekend.


Given this and the fact that the last EDF drink was only a week ago, the self appointed EDF Social Committee suggest that we have the next gathering on Friday 9 November.


Venue - The Forest Hill Tavern

I don't think you should repeat the Gowlett when there are other places that haven't been done (FHT), and others that were done before it... Obviously Mag hosted the party, so that's out.


I would suggest EDT, as it was an early one, not that well attended, and a decent venue... That or The Drum, as we could just take over the whole place and have an EDF party.


Or the CPT... ;-)

I agree with Keef we shouldn't repeat venues so quickly


I like the idea of The Drum (but hasn't that also been a venue)


Sean H-L is the one who prompted this discussion AND lives near the FHT AND is a venue we haven't done....


* coughs * Omrith is also next door and could be an early stomach-liner

Me too. Haven't been in the FHT for more than 20 years and haven't been in since the refit and feel we should give it a go. The Drum or CPT is an excellent idea for the Xmas party but the CPT would just swing it for me as it's bigger.

The 10th is better for me cos I am drafted onto lates over the Halloween/Bonfire period... for my sins. Looking forward to meeting you all over again & I promise to be more socialable this time, I was having a bit of a shy moment last time.


See some of you at CPT for the rugby tomorrow ~ Cheers GG

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...