Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We were robbed on the only evening we are out of the house, weekly. Our next door neighbor was robbed on the ONLY day he goes out.


This may have been an opportunity crime, but it seems odd. Either way, please take precaution. We are on the Upland Road and Barry Road intersection.


Motion detecter lights, Grill on windows and doors and so on.


The Police explained that if we call them whenever we are suspicious; even mildly so, they will eventually increase police presence in the area. Hence, please call and report anything you might consider suspicious.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/17554-burglary-on-barry-rd-may-29th/
Share on other sites

We came home around 11pm to discover that someone had broken the glass on our front door, reached in and turned the lock, and in this way stole bikes in the hall. They may have tried to enter the flats as well, but we live across from a brightly lit busstop....(one reason for moving in on loud Barry road in the first place). According to the police, most likely, someone was a look-out at the busstop and gave a thumbs up when all was clear and committed the crime. The police said day time crime happens in a different way, most likely folks will walk around, ring door bells and when all is clear, i.e. when the door is not answered, break in then.


We are going to put bars on the inside of the door. Still, this is disconcerting. A. They could have made it into the flats, B. we could have caught them, they could have closed the boor behind them causing injury to our persons. This thing happened at about 11, NO ONE heard them?


I did hear some noise over the weekend and now think I should have called the police. Why not?! I was in Peckham before the streets were finally repaired. Pipes had been laid out for the next days work. My partner and I were leaving the Cinema when a white van pulled up, 3-4 guys got out and started putting the piping onto their van. People looked out of their shop doors watching...no one did anything. Finally, I called the police. I think we are all too hesitant to call them....



So again, I say whenever you hear something and when sometihng happens as "insignificant" as having one's flower pots stolen, we call the police!


I also talked to the council about funding some sort of neighborhood watch, getting more street lights going and so on. I think we all live here for the safety, among other ammenities....so let's pull together. Thank you all for your messages.

Hi Sue,

Which street did you fail to get Police to support neighbourhood watch?

If it was ED Police I'll be shocked.


Hi biancason,

On our oak front door glass sections we've had a laminate added. So the glass can't be smashed. We've also had manchester and london bars, If you live in the East Dulwich ward parts of Barry Road the flat can have FREE property marking kits and using them properly and placing the stickers at doors will seriourly deter burglars.


For bikes I've installed a wall anchor to lock them to via the anchor to the wall. I'd really recommend these.

Hi James,


I didn't contact the police, they contacted me via a flyer about Neighbourhood Watch through the door (Ulverscroft Road). They asked for my response to be returned either to ED police station (I think it was) or emailed to them. I emailed saying I would like to be involved in Neighbourhood Watch, but haven't heard anything about it since. :-S


Can't remember if my email was acknowledged tbh, it was ages ago.

Hi bloonoo and others,

To receive a free property marking kit you need to be an East Dulwich ward resident - area within the area bounded by Grove Vale, Melbourne Grove, Lordship Lane, Dunstand Road, Underhill, Friern Road, Upland Road, Crystal Palace Road, East Dulwich Road.


Contact the ED Safer Neighbourhood Team or me with your full name, address and contact details.

The ED SNT then pop round and help you deploy the kit and most importantly register it.

My contact details are below.

ED SNT [email protected]

  • 2 weeks later...

http://www.met.police.uk/contacts/public_access_survey.htm


Please everyone respond to this police questionnaire asap! Last days

At the Community Council meeting last night this questionnaire came up as the way they decide on what the public want so, fill the questionnaire in today


Generally and separately I read these posts about crime and I see possibly no no more than 20 people who are preying on a geographical area that suits them. I say this as this puts the problem the other way round: a "gang", a group that thinks they've sorted their how to make a living problems is targeting "us". In a way, it is a finite problem. These people can be targeted themselves and stopped. Report the crimes to the professions and help them clearly see the look for patterns: casing houses, open backdoors.


I do not want criminals to stop me, make me afraid. I want to help the police take out people who have decided crime pays. It does go back to other social issues and finally families but I don't want to start that


Fill out the questionnaire. This area has the highest responce rate to the survey ... am I right? In the whole of England! Wow, you rock!

In point of fact (I don't really remember the survey but non the less in general) I completely agree to your point that a great deal of interactive community responce touchy feely government is crap. The way I see it is the best people should be hired to do a job and best means knowing the subject at a 360 degree perspective in a modern ever changing world and then they are hired to show and explain leadership. Leadership here means what is the best practice for taking out these small bandit groups that arise like foxes in a territory (one dies or leaves and another comes in).


Leadership here also means knowing how much infrastructure needs to maintained in a permanent on going basis. Infrastructure like land and buildings cannot be bought in or replaced at whim. Once it is gone it is gone forever. The replacement cost for a building sold today to raise however many pounds simply cannot be replaced if a mistake is made.


Downsizing government tends to be permanent and the consequences of selling public assets long term could be astronomical.


Is the answer to these profound questions really found by poorly asked questions that in the whole country at best 400 people answer?


At the community council meeting a question of out patient services was also covered as a matter of urgency as one space will be sold and the patients moved to join others in another space. The arguments were solid but short sighted: the space is costly to maintain and has a large value on the market. In the same breathe the future needs of an aging population were discussed. So if this building and others are sold off... where will those not so far in the future patients be accomodated?


The police station is a huge interesting property in the heart of a bulging population hub. While the council is not a "business" there must be innovative ways to fill this space and cover costs

You liberals really take the biscuit. Your old strategy of playing everyone off against each other ain't gonna work no more Mr Barber. The cheek of this comment....are you not in government with Dave and the boys. You know they're gonna eat you alive, if they haven't already. Deal with the responsibility of being in power! Shameful post. The station is getting closed because of policies prescribed by Clegg and Huhne and Cable. Traitors maybe but they're yours so deal with it, accept it and promote it. BTW you said you'd get me some docs regarding Forest Hill Road planning. Still waiting.

Hi Tonyquinn,

Clearly keeping a local police station means police are more locally present when things like burglaries etc occur on local roads such as Barry Road.


You don't seem to know of the ED Police station recent history or the decision making bodies involved for London Police stations. The Met Police is controlled by the Met Police Authority and the Mayor of London and they make the decisions.

The original proposal to close it was made when Ken Livingston was the London Mayor. It has been implied under Boris Johnson's mayoral term when it started and more recently. We have a London election in 2012 so I'd be surprised if it closes betweem now and May 2012 and I'm hopeful we'll be able to get mayoral candidates to pledge to keep local Police stations open. However, something will need to happen to ED Police station as the attached photo shows it has concrete cancer. Equally the old ED Polcie station junction of Crystal Palace Road with Upland Road should be sold if capital receipts is the issue. Ideally the old police station would be used for a couple of years while the current one is repalced. Proabably the ground floor kept for the Polce and other local publci services and floors above for apartments. ideal would be a S106 providing a front Police station counter with a long lease from the police ot house officers there and the semi commercial rent pays for the front desk to be opened.


WRT the First Road Hill traffic plans. I've requested them and will chase as it has taken a long time to not have them to forward them to you.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...