Jump to content

Recommended Posts

For nearly a year I have been studying the geology of the East Dulwich & Nunhead valley and I have encountered an unexpected problem.


I have not found any hard evidence that there is any London Clay in our valley.


Over the years there have been posts on the East Dulwich Forum about insurance companies asserting that houses in our valley are built upon London Clay and either refusing buildings insurance or asking for higher premiums.


Has any insurance company provided evidence to support this assertion?


John K


EDIT 2011-06-19: Temporary change of thread title

EDIT 2011-06-24: Title reversion

I'm not sure that's quite how it works.


I think that the insurance companies base premiums on the prevalence of particular claims currently being made in an area. If premiums are high, that's because claims are high rather than because of geological studies.


I think the 'London Clay' rationale was created after the fact, and it's more a popular meme than geologically accurate.


The London Basin Forum seems to be the group most likely to generate an accurate map, and it makes clear that London Clay is not always the surface geology, which can be a mix of river terraces and various sandy gravels.

Thanks, Hugenot,


I think you have the essential truth of it. Insurance companies make unsupported assertions and "London Clay" is a convenient, but inaccurate, handle. However, I'm still interested in reports of any assertions insurance companies have made about local geology.


Evidence of any geologically induced subsidence in our valley is elusive.


I have read nearly all of the material of the London Basin Forum (and the Thames Gateway Project) and followed up many of the bibliographic references in the hope that they might contain material about our valley.


There's not much there:


A few inconsequential and contradictory references to the Dulwich Fault.


An analysis of the Harders Road borehole which, although immediately outside our valley, provides tentative evidence for the River Peck alluvial fan.


This is not surprising as apart from the River Peck draining into the Thames Basin our valley is a separate geological feature. I recently placed a map in the Lounge which illustrates this.


The river terraces are a north of the Thames feature. I have carefully examined our valley for any unexpected remnants of river terraces but have found none.


John K

I remember there being quite a discussion on here a couple of years ago when Thames water started digging that huge pipe from Honor Oak Reservoir. There were quite a lot of links about the make up of the ground in the area as people were worried that their homes were going to sink. Cannot seem to find it now
I thought that historically there had been brickfields in the area (hence the prevalence of restrictive covenants forbidding the burning of bricks on local property titles) - surely there would need to be clay present for the brickfields to be successful

When I used to live in Nunhead (Ivydale Road) I did a bit of investigation to find out what the subsoil was, for buildings insurance purposes. Someone at the British Geological Survey told me it's clay. Not sure if it's "London clay" or some other kind of clay. There may be other layers of sediment above or below the clay. If you want more detail for a specific site you can buy a geological map from the BGS (http://shop.bgs.ac.uk/Georeports/info.cfm?STD_REP=S002). BGS might be able to give the general picture for the area, if you can find the right person to talk to.


Dulwich & Norwood have very high buildings insurance premiums (about the highest in the UK) due to the high risk of subsidence. I'm no expert, but I suspect shrinking & expansion of the subsoil clay is the main cause.

Try:


BGS geology viewer


Open viewer zoom in and at 1:50 000 a key appears. You may need to adjust the transparancy of the overlay to accurately match the key.


This indicates surface geology to be London Clay over the vast majority (there are no overlying / superficial deposits indicated). To the north towards Bellenden Rd area the geology changes to Lambeth Group clay/silt/sand aka Woolwich & Reading beds, believe this is also known as brick earth; the combination of clay and sand being fundamental to brick manufacture (I think)



"inconsistency"?


Changeable, yes.


Variable, yes.


Inconsistent, nah. The correct terminology is lateral heterogeneity.


JohnK - someone has suggested you contact BGS which is what I would recommend too, all their maps are online now. I have also PMd you about someone who knows quite a bit about London's geology who may be able to help. Good luck with your project.


PS Here's a favourite of mine from the great, VC Illing, 1919.


"Geology is not an exact science. The personal factor looms so large in many of its problems that he must needs be hardy who dares to be positive, and inexperienced who considers his verdict the final solution."

I dug footings for an extension on Crystal Palace Road and 18 inches-2ft down it was clay, I dug a foot of clay out along the whole 'U' shaped trench. Do NOT tell me that I didn't need to dig down 3ft for a single story extension !

Carrying it out to skip in buckets was murder, clay is a swine to dig and extremely heavy.

So we defo have clay in (at least parts of) East Dulwich.

EDmummy:


This is the post from last year that you remember.


It was written by that idiot in the bookshop. I'll speak to him, tell him I've read more about the subject than he had, and put him straight.


Every time he wrote "London Clay" he should have written "one or more of the layers of mixed clay, sand and gravel that fall under the umbrella London Clay Formation classification".


That will teach him.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
    • Looking for crate/toys/play pen etc. Ideally will buy in a bundle. Can collect!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...