Jump to content

Farmed or wild salmon?


Odyssey

Recommended Posts

Either way we shouldn't eat too much of them.


FSA guidelines recommend only 2-3 portions (of any oily fish) a week because of dioxins in the fish (wild or farmed) caused by industrial pollution. Oily fish attract/absorb much more of this poison than non-oily fish which is safer to eat in greater amounts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Health-wise: Wild Salmon. Farmed salmon has quite a few issues regarding fish health.


Environmental wise... a bit of a conundrum. Wild stocks can obviously only handle so much fishing, but farming's impact on the environment can be pretty big itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then you've got to factor in the fact that fish farms support communities, in often remote parts of the country, with good jobs.


However, that is then counteracted (possibly) by the fact that farmed salmon has undercut wild salmon to such an extent that it has become uneconomical to fish and put fisherman out of business.


Veeeery tricky and emotive subject.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the context of overfishing (such that wild fish populations for many species are close to collapse), alongside an ever increasing demand for fish, then fish farming is surely the "sustainable" solution. Farmed salmon has a number of significant issues eg disease, pollution, welfare and impact on wild fish stocks, but assuming that these can be addressed via strict legislation (as per land-based farming) then it is the way forward. An interesting side-angle is around looking at alternatives to sea-fish - most fresh water fisheries (trout, course) are managed for sport, although historically most medieval monastries/estates would have had a carp pond for eating.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can someone please explain who "one Dulwich" are?
    • We are actually referred to as "Supporters"...2,100 of us across Dulwich...read and weep! 😉   https://www.onedulwich.uk/supporters   Got it, the one where 64% of respondents in the consultation area said they wanted the measures "returned to their original state". Is that the one you claim had a yes/no response question?   Well I suggest you read up on it as it is an important part of the story of utter mismangement by the councils and this is why so many of us can't work out who is pulling the council's strings on this one because surely you can agree that if the emergency services were knocking on your door for months and months telling you the blocks in the roads were delayihg response times and putting lives at risk you'd do something about it? Pretty negligent not to do so don't you think - if I was a councillor it would not sit well with me?   Careful it could be a Mrs, Miss or Mx One.....   Of course you don't that's because you have strong opinions but hate being asked for detail to.back-up those opinions (especially when it doesn't serve their narrative) and exposes the flaws in your arguments! 😉  As so many of the pro-LTN lobby find to their cost the devil is always in the detail.....
    • Really?  I'm sorry to hear that. What did you order? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...