Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Either way we shouldn't eat too much of them.


FSA guidelines recommend only 2-3 portions (of any oily fish) a week because of dioxins in the fish (wild or farmed) caused by industrial pollution. Oily fish attract/absorb much more of this poison than non-oily fish which is safer to eat in greater amounts.

Then you've got to factor in the fact that fish farms support communities, in often remote parts of the country, with good jobs.


However, that is then counteracted (possibly) by the fact that farmed salmon has undercut wild salmon to such an extent that it has become uneconomical to fish and put fisherman out of business.


Veeeery tricky and emotive subject.

In the context of overfishing (such that wild fish populations for many species are close to collapse), alongside an ever increasing demand for fish, then fish farming is surely the "sustainable" solution. Farmed salmon has a number of significant issues eg disease, pollution, welfare and impact on wild fish stocks, but assuming that these can be addressed via strict legislation (as per land-based farming) then it is the way forward. An interesting side-angle is around looking at alternatives to sea-fish - most fresh water fisheries (trout, course) are managed for sport, although historically most medieval monastries/estates would have had a carp pond for eating.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
    • He is toast  he should never have been appointed  and starmer flannelling about all of this shows exceptionally poor judgement  a disgrace all around 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...