Jump to content

Petition for the convicted rioters to lose benefits

snss75

By snss75
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Senor Chevalier

Senor Chevalier

Posted
Posted

RB amazingly I think I follow what you are saying. Or at least I think I do. Who the f* knows. Seriously, your posts take longer to read then they must do to write. Sort it out.


ETA: What's the collective noun for trolls?

edcam

edcam

Posted
Posted

> Why should I keep a civil tongue after you've

> accused me of lying about my employment? Now

> that's offensive. Not racist, just downright

> spiteful. I mean, say you've got kids, and I call

> bullshit to score points. Would you remain polite?

> I think not, somehow.


You really aren't in the position to accuse others of being impolite judging by some of your unpleasant posts in this thread.

Rick Channing

Rick Channing

Posted
Posted

@Santerme, hmmm... That's real classy. But hey, I don't have to 'prove' jack shit to anybody. Especially to a moron like you. I bet the only Emerald City you ever visited was in the Land od Oz.


@Otta, are you retarded, or what? I'm British, like I told your bum chum Huguenot from the outset.



What is this, some kind of libtard neighbourhood watch ganging-up on the new guy?

LadyDeliah

LadyDeliah

Posted
Posted

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You seem to be very hung up on the homosexual act

> of love, Rick.

>

> I'm thinking an index offence perhaps. This

> gentleman doth protest too much.



I think you may have hit that particular hammer, squarely on the head there Ms H!

Rick Channing

Rick Channing

Posted
Posted
First I blow the racism accusation outa the water, now I'm being accused of homophobia. Christ, you libtards'll try anything to avoid confronting the errors you've made about a person's character. Sucks to be you, I guess.
Huguenot

Huguenot

Posted
Posted

Ricky dear, if people don't think you're British it's entirely your own fault. You introduced yourself to the forum by saying this:


"What a shame it is that the firearms laws in this country are so unnecessarily restrictive. Now that's something you people should get your Parliament to debate on."


If you say things like that it's pretty clear that you don't consider yourself to be British, and you don't consider this parliament or society to be yours.


I'm just starting to think you're a pretty sad case now - all this talk of guns and defending your family, all this racism and homophobia, it's all just sad.

RosieH

RosieH

Posted
Posted
No Rick. I think you're the retard in this particular scenario. If you understood my post (and frankly, a moron like you, I'm not surprised you didn't) you would see that I was suggesting that far from being a homophobe, you actually have quite an obsessive interest in other men's bottoms.
LadyDeliah

LadyDeliah

Posted
Posted

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No Rick. I think you're the retard in this

> particular scenario. If you understood my post

> (and frankly, a moron like you, I'm not surprised

> you didn't) you would see that I was suggesting

> that far from being a homophobe, you actually have

> quite an obsessive interest in other men's

> bottoms.


This is why I love the EDF!

Otta

Otta

Posted
Posted

Rick, I never suggested that you weren't British, what on earth are you talking about?


I was suggesting that if you went to America (which I whole heartedly believe you should ASAP), that you'd be an immigrant, because you are British.


Is that clearer, or would you like a power point presentation?


And no, there is no ganging up on the new guy. It just seems that a lot of people have independently reached the conclusion that you're a bit of a tool.

edhistory

edhistory

Posted
Posted

Frankito Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I have always wanted to perform a live,

> monkey-human brain swap but it would appear that

> someone may have successfully beaten me to it....!


I object to your insult to monkeys.


John K

Santerme

Santerme

Posted
Posted

Rick Channing Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @Santerme, hmmm... That's real classy. But hey, I

> don't have to 'prove' jack shit to anybody.

> Especially to a moron like you. I bet the only

> Emerald City you ever visited was in the Land od

> Oz.

>

> @Otta, are you retarded, or what? I'm British,

> like I told your bum chum Huguenot from the

> outset.

>

>

> What is this, some kind of libtard neighbourhood

> watch ganging-up on the new guy?


You are well past the proof stage already Rick.


Never mind, plenty more forums out there.

richardbach

richardbach

Posted
Posted
i don tihnk rik was realy an merican as he used to many mericn words likey howdy an eazy ov er an suny side up in his tirsom dialog i tinhk taht rick was loking to stirr things up on teh furom then gin their are poeple on the furom who seam to hol d veiwpoints taht seam sort of uotlandihs like som of teh commens in teh riot threds the madest thuogh is the post for info for a homeppathetic vet maybe i shuold set me up as homeppathic vet as it neds no qulifcations but seams to be mony spiner lol
mockney piers

mockney piers

Posted
Posted

Either he was american trying to wind up the pinko limies or he was british and overusing americanisms to wind up liberal/far-left fellow brits.


Use of libertards wouldn't generally occur to your average brit as it just not in our lexicon and hence wouldn't get wound up by it, which makes me suspect the former. I suppose, given his 'walt' (from walter mitty is that right?) status, maybe he hangs around US boards full of wingnuts and picked it up there.


Either way he just wasn't very good at trolling, he revealed his hand too early every time and went straight for the insults which just make EDFers shrug rather than get upset.


Quids style he should have just stuck to blaming the guardian and he'd have got much greater mileage out of us.


It was the XE Services insistence that was the giveaway for me, it's just too obvious and unlikely as bait.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Gill B
      Electrician recommendation: Electrical Initiative Ltd

      By Gill B · Posted

      Very happy to add my recommendation for Leon, who has now helped me out twice. Prompt, efficient and helpful.
    • Spartacus
      The economy, a sensible debate in advance of the budget

      By Spartacus · Posted

      Today we are seeing the impact of increased taxes (employers NI) with tje UK unemployment rate rising  https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdxrp7znkdlo Unfortunately, to increase tax burdens will see the economy stall or a recession, as Angelina says, cutting spending, whilst painful short term, is a good way to bring down government borrowing.  True, we don't want to see cuts to services but there are other areas of government spending that can be reduced and with AI impacting all jobs across all businesses, maybe it will also reduce overall staffing costs. 
    • Angelina
      The economy, a sensible debate in advance of the budget

      By Angelina · Posted

      or cut costs.  The cost of debt is a huge burden, it cannot be increased.
    • Earl Aelfheah
      The economy, a sensible debate in advance of the budget

      By Earl Aelfheah · Posted

      Yes, they should clearly have been more honest on taxes before the election and not backed themselves into a corner. After 14 years of mismanagement and decline, they have to invest and at the same time start to bring borrowing down (otherwise they continues to be at the mercy of the bond markets). Continued cuts / degrading of public services is counter productive (a successful economy and society needs good infrastructure, education and health care).  The single biggest thing they could do to immediately improve growth would be to rejoin the single market, but I appreciate that is difficult politically.  So if you can't significantly boost growth short term, can't cut too much further, and need to raise money without borrowing, that only really leaves taxation.    Of course, where best to target those taxes - that's the real question.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...