Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw the Hughes wave this afternoon and thought it was hilarious.


We complain that managers aren't given enough time and when Hughes doesn't deliver (yet, and they are only 3 points behind Arsenal with a game in hand over most teams) in his first full season with their new found wealth you think he should be sacked!


Keef, your dislike of him wouldn't stem from his United associations would it? ;)

Keef, your dislike of him wouldn't stem from his United associations would it? ;)


Genuinely nothing to do with it. As I've said before, I was not in to footy at all as a kid, didn't get in to it until I was over 16, and didn't get really in to it until I moved to Liverpool. As a result, I remember Hughes more as a veteran player for Chelsea.


I just think he's a c**t, what more can I say.

I think Mark Hughes is doing a great job at Man City. I believe they've lost only once all season. That is a tough squad of players to keep under control with their history but all seems to be calm in Manchester. I think it's only a matter of time before they really kick on with Sparky in charge.

Taken from the Gooner website, very clever.



Some people never seem motivated to participate, but are just content to watch while others do the work. They are called "Spec Taters".


Some people never do anything to help, but are gifted at finding fault with the way others do the work. They are called "Comment Taters".


Some people are always looking to cause problems by asking others to agree with them. It is too hot or too cold. too sour or too sweet. They are called "Agie Taters".


There are those who say they will help, but somehow just never get around to actually doing the promised help. They are called "Hezzie Taters".


Some people can put up a front and pretend to be someone they are not. They are called "Immy Taters".


And then there are those who believe that they are so much better than their nearest and dearest neighbours but can never perform when it counts. They are called "Spuds".

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Man City 3 Chelsea 2


Have you got any monery on this result, the odds must be very good. I can't see it myslef but it must be worth a fiver of anyones money, if it comes up of course.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm... that's as maybe but it was the West 0 Man

> Utd 0 that raised my eyebrows. Should a few in

> that one.



Again I can't see this but if it comes up...., what are the odds for this result?

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Man City 3 Chelsea 2

>

> Have you got any monery on this result, the odds

> must be very good. I can't see it myslef but it

> must be worth a fiver of anyones money, if it

> comes up of course.


40/1 on the high street - 50/1 om-line.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...