Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw the Hughes wave this afternoon and thought it was hilarious.


We complain that managers aren't given enough time and when Hughes doesn't deliver (yet, and they are only 3 points behind Arsenal with a game in hand over most teams) in his first full season with their new found wealth you think he should be sacked!


Keef, your dislike of him wouldn't stem from his United associations would it? ;)

Keef, your dislike of him wouldn't stem from his United associations would it? ;)


Genuinely nothing to do with it. As I've said before, I was not in to footy at all as a kid, didn't get in to it until I was over 16, and didn't get really in to it until I moved to Liverpool. As a result, I remember Hughes more as a veteran player for Chelsea.


I just think he's a c**t, what more can I say.

I think Mark Hughes is doing a great job at Man City. I believe they've lost only once all season. That is a tough squad of players to keep under control with their history but all seems to be calm in Manchester. I think it's only a matter of time before they really kick on with Sparky in charge.

Taken from the Gooner website, very clever.



Some people never seem motivated to participate, but are just content to watch while others do the work. They are called "Spec Taters".


Some people never do anything to help, but are gifted at finding fault with the way others do the work. They are called "Comment Taters".


Some people are always looking to cause problems by asking others to agree with them. It is too hot or too cold. too sour or too sweet. They are called "Agie Taters".


There are those who say they will help, but somehow just never get around to actually doing the promised help. They are called "Hezzie Taters".


Some people can put up a front and pretend to be someone they are not. They are called "Immy Taters".


And then there are those who believe that they are so much better than their nearest and dearest neighbours but can never perform when it counts. They are called "Spuds".

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Man City 3 Chelsea 2


Have you got any monery on this result, the odds must be very good. I can't see it myslef but it must be worth a fiver of anyones money, if it comes up of course.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm... that's as maybe but it was the West 0 Man

> Utd 0 that raised my eyebrows. Should a few in

> that one.



Again I can't see this but if it comes up...., what are the odds for this result?

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Man City 3 Chelsea 2

>

> Have you got any monery on this result, the odds

> must be very good. I can't see it myslef but it

> must be worth a fiver of anyones money, if it

> comes up of course.


40/1 on the high street - 50/1 om-line.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...