Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I saw the Hughes wave this afternoon and thought it was hilarious.


We complain that managers aren't given enough time and when Hughes doesn't deliver (yet, and they are only 3 points behind Arsenal with a game in hand over most teams) in his first full season with their new found wealth you think he should be sacked!


Keef, your dislike of him wouldn't stem from his United associations would it? ;)

Keef, your dislike of him wouldn't stem from his United associations would it? ;)


Genuinely nothing to do with it. As I've said before, I was not in to footy at all as a kid, didn't get in to it until I was over 16, and didn't get really in to it until I moved to Liverpool. As a result, I remember Hughes more as a veteran player for Chelsea.


I just think he's a c**t, what more can I say.

I think Mark Hughes is doing a great job at Man City. I believe they've lost only once all season. That is a tough squad of players to keep under control with their history but all seems to be calm in Manchester. I think it's only a matter of time before they really kick on with Sparky in charge.

Taken from the Gooner website, very clever.



Some people never seem motivated to participate, but are just content to watch while others do the work. They are called "Spec Taters".


Some people never do anything to help, but are gifted at finding fault with the way others do the work. They are called "Comment Taters".


Some people are always looking to cause problems by asking others to agree with them. It is too hot or too cold. too sour or too sweet. They are called "Agie Taters".


There are those who say they will help, but somehow just never get around to actually doing the promised help. They are called "Hezzie Taters".


Some people can put up a front and pretend to be someone they are not. They are called "Immy Taters".


And then there are those who believe that they are so much better than their nearest and dearest neighbours but can never perform when it counts. They are called "Spuds".

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Man City 3 Chelsea 2


Have you got any monery on this result, the odds must be very good. I can't see it myslef but it must be worth a fiver of anyones money, if it comes up of course.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hmmm... that's as maybe but it was the West 0 Man

> Utd 0 that raised my eyebrows. Should a few in

> that one.



Again I can't see this but if it comes up...., what are the odds for this result?

Atila Reincarnate Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> red devil Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Man City 3 Chelsea 2

>

> Have you got any monery on this result, the odds

> must be very good. I can't see it myslef but it

> must be worth a fiver of anyones money, if it

> comes up of course.


40/1 on the high street - 50/1 om-line.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I used to like it's original incarnation (other friends did NOT like it), but when Capital pubco sold to Greene King, they turned it into some identikit, upmarket, let's pretend we are on the river in Richmond menu - hence pretentious. And completely anodyne  The rougher ones tend to have the striking Green coloured signage with a simple ugly font The pretentious (the ones they bought in Dulwich) go for a much flouncier look and feeling serve things like: Sesame-grilled sweetheart cabbage, gochujang glaze, coconut yoghurt, crispy onions, herbs for nearly 20 quid   (time was, on here we used to get into debates about a burger and fries costing a whole tenner!)
    • Are you saying the Bishop pretty rough or pretty pretentious? I haven’t been in for ages.
    • Some incidental background info, (I presume this is the relevant edition of Panorama), from https://www.c21media.net/news/blue-ant-studios-takes-october-films-president-trump-a-second-chance-to-cannes/: Blue Ant Studios to shop BBC’s President Trump: A Second Chance? in Cannes October Films’ President Trump: A Second Chance? airs on the BBC this month Blue Ant Studios will launch forthcoming documentary President Trump: A Second Chance? (working title) at Mipcom this month. Produced by October Films in the UK, the 1×60’ doc, which has just wrapped production, was commissioned by the BBC for its Panorama strand, where it will premiere on October 29. President Trump: A Second Chance? will provide an up-to-date and comprehensive look at Donald Trump’s run for the White House over the past 18 months. Featuring expert analysis, archive material and interviews with those closest to Trump, the doc asks how it has been possible for a now-convicted felon to be within striking distance of securing a second term as president. Blue Ant Studios holds the international licensing rights to the doc, excluding the UK. It will be joined on its Mipcom slate by nature series Walking with Elephants (3×60’) and Roman history doc Emperor: Rise & Fall of a Dynasty. Karolina Kaminska 10-10-2024 ©C21Media  
    • I don't believe it offers free WiFi, and if it does from a pretty grotty and expensive to maintain platform. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...