Jump to content

Recommended Posts

>

> As said before keane was is, and will always be a

> coont that nobody likes. Oh and by the way Viera

> didn't ever break a players leg or maim another

> player on purpose, unlike the coont Keane. An

> accomplishemnt of which I'm sure Keane is very

> proud. Tw@t.

>



Atila - by "maim"ing I take it you mean alf-inge Haaland - Roy Keane did not end Haalands career with THAT tackle - Haalands career was ended by an injury to his other leg. So while Keane was guilty of many bad tackles, just to be clear, he did not end Haaland's career. If you checked your facts before making these statements you would know that.


H?land is often remembered for Roy Keane's feud with him. In 1997, when Manchester United were losing to Haaland's Leeds United team, Keane attempted to tackle H?land late in the game. In the process, Keane injured his anterior cruciate ligament. As Keane lay prone on the ground, H?land criticised Keane for the tackle and suggested that he was feigning injury to avoid punishment. Keane was booked as he was stretchered off the field. Three and a half years later, in 2001, Keane fouled H?land, high up on his right knee. Initially, Keane was simply fined ?5000 and received a 3-match ban. However, in his biography he admitted that he wanted to "hurt" H?land as revenge for the taunting he received years previously. After this revelation, Keane received an additional 5 game ban, and ?150,000 fine. H?land retired through injury, co-incidentally to the other knee, in 2002.[1]

Agreed, kpc. It seems as if we may at last have a team able to compete at this level. Although its easy to get carried away! If McLeish spends wisely next month then who knows? That trip to Europe may just happen! KRO



Kpc

Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Almost half-term and we're 7th rather than 17th

> which I'd have accepted. Unbeaten in nine games,

> our run coincides with regime change at St Andrews

> (about which I had my doubts) which seems to have

> spread an enthusiasm throughout the club. McLeish

> conducts himself with quiet dignity and the team

> are playing for each other and showing great

> commitment. Staying up remains the first priority

> but having bagged 28 points so far goes a long way

> towards that target. Who knows, seems like may

> have to dust off my old AA Road Map of Europe yet

> - seems like there's a few new nation states since

> our last foray. Now for a good whisky and a chorus

> of Keep Right On..........

I'm pleased for Birmingham City but I have to say I'm slightly surprised as Martin O'Neill was streets ahead of McLeish when they were both in Glasgow.

Now they are both in Birmingham now and I guess MON is still ahead but with McLeish on the much smaller budget its difficult to say which is the bigger achievement.

McLeish comes across as a nice gut but always has been a winner too, so well done to him. Birmingham as a city of 4? teams has never seen it so good - or not for a while anyway.

I don't like to say it but I rate O'Neill highly as a manager and if McLeish does the same at Blues then I will be happy. Yes Mick if the baggies go up without blues or wolves going down then we may see a mini revival in football fortunes in west midlands which is a long time coming...
The competition between the clubs has to be a good thing. Blues fans have been quietly saying that since Randy Lerner took over from Deadly Doug Ellis that he has done a lot right at the Vile. With both managers, you can expect an honest approach and commitment. So far, our new board appears to be on the right track. Nobody's getting carried away with our current run and the realistic aspiration now is to finish comfortably above relegation. Let's see what happens in the January window.

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I thought McLeish had the upperhand in Glasgow -

> didn't he win a few doubles and also reach CL QF?



Get a life Matt........I think he drank a few doubles. I'm taking your point as a wind up so I'm stopping there.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I thought McLeish had the upperhand in Glasgow

> -

> > didn't he win a few doubles and also reach CL

> QF?

>

>

> Get a life Matt........I think he drank a few

> doubles. I'm taking your point as a wind up so I'm

> stopping there.


Cmon Matt.....say something....

We've had quite a few performances where people have said 'as long as you play like that' or 'you're too good to go down'

Liverpool and arsenal games sprin to mind among others.


Let me assure you that we don't keep playing like that. We've been here before and instinct tells me that this year we're going down. If we get everybody back from injury soon and remain largely injury free for the rest of the season then we'll do it, but again not convinced by that one.


Without someone like Tevez to rally the team (for it was vey mug a team effort that kept us up that season) I see us stumbling despondently to relegation.

There's never a good time to go down, but if we do I see us more the way of Southampton, Leeds and Forest before them who at least show there's life after doldrums.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> >

> > As said before keane was is, and will always be

> a

> > coont that nobody likes. Oh and by the way

> Viera

> > didn't ever break a players leg or maim another

> > player on purpose, unlike the coont Keane. An

> > accomplishemnt of which I'm sure Keane is very

> > proud. Tw@t.

> >

>

>

> Atila - by "maim"ing I take it you mean alf-inge

> Haaland - Roy Keane did not end Haalands career

> with THAT tackle - Haalands career was ended by an

> injury to his other leg. So while Keane was guilty

> of many bad tackles, just to be clear, he did not

> end Haaland's career. If you checked your facts

> before making these statements you would know

> that.

>

> H?land is often remembered for Roy Keane's feud

> with him. In 1997, when Manchester United were

> losing to Haaland's Leeds United team, Keane

> attempted to tackle H?land late in the game. In

> the process, Keane injured his anterior cruciate

> ligament. As Keane lay prone on the ground, H?land

> criticised Keane for the tackle and suggested that

> he was feigning injury to avoid punishment. Keane

> was booked as he was stretchered off the field.

> Three and a half years later, in 2001, Keane

> fouled H?land, high up on his right knee.

> Initially, Keane was simply fined ?5000 and

> received a 3-match ban. However, in his biography

> he admitted that he wanted to "hurt" H?land as

> revenge for the taunting he received years

> previously. After this revelation, Keane received

> an additional 5 game ban, and ?150,000 fine.

> H?land retired through injury, co-incidentally to

> the other knee, in 2002.[1]



You miss the point old son, he injured a player on purpose, that to me is unforgiveable. I stand by what I said about him.

Declan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sandperson Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Declan, I rest my case.

>

> Gobshite is too mild....


Wow, a one liner Groucho Marx would be proud of!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • No doubt the schools in Harrogate are being discussed on the East Harrogate Forum or whatever. Dulwich College is being discussed because it's local. Saying "ooh, there were loads of schools mentioned" is a bit dismissive. It was Dulwich College that referred sex abuse allegations about pupils to the police and Dulwich College that used the spectre of the police to suppress dissent. 🤔
    • Hi, I was just wondering what experiences any of you have had in relation to an Independent Panel review relating to the Permanent Exclusion of a SEN child. 1. General experience Any experiences, positive or negative, in general? 2. Clerks Associates UK Any experience of this entity acting as an "independent clerk" to an Independent Review Panel in a matter involving a Permanent Exclusion of a SEN pupil, also involving discrimination under the Equality Act 2010. There is limited publicly available information with regards to this "independent clerk"; however, I can see from their Annual Report & Accounts at Companies House that they are a small, privately owned organisation.   I am very concerned that there is a clear and material risk that they are highly dependent for their revenues and cash flow from the business that they receive from the school and its parent Trust (which has 9 schools in total under its management) who have appointed them. I also note that the Trust has a material employee relations dispute with their staff over underpayment of maternity pay whilst materially increasing the salaries of the highest paid Trust executives and other highly paid staff (presumably the Head Teachers). https://southwarknews.co.uk/news/community/teachers-at-six-charter-schools-walk-out-in-first-of-four-strike-days-planned-for-this-month/ Given the current situation, we have no choice but to engage in this process of an Independent Panel Review; however, we are concerned as to various elements including this one which is a key role in providing independence. 3. Independent SEN expert We have the right to an independent SEN expert to review the matter and provide their opinion to the Independent Review Panel. The concept is that this person is supposedly acting "independently" and also solely in respect of the SEN elements of the matter. We do not however know who this person is, their experience or level of independence. The last information that I can find in the public domain about the effectiveness of an Independent SEN expert is a UK govt report from 2014 which portrays a very mixed experience for parents. Hence, we are seeking to understand if anyone has any more recent experience of an Independent SEN expert in relation to an Independent Panel Review. Many thanks for any thoughts that you have based on your experience. For reasons of confidentiality, it is perhaps better to send any replies to me directly. Many thanks
    • Hang in there, friends. Most of us appreciate that you're trying you best and these companies are a nightmare!
    • I agree about the site and buying another one, but I was responding to a query about the old site. Which was no longer fit for purpose. Selling that and not buying another locally was just money for old rope for the foreign owners, as was moving the DO to an unsuitable building too far away. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...