Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what if you were there. I saw it on telly and

> the replays highlighted what Gallas was trying to

> do. The debate here is intent. Wenger says that a

> lot of teams are going out with the intent to

> injure his players. He may have a point. But here

> was an example of one of his players intending to

> injure an opponent. I wonder if he gave Gallas a

> bolloking afterwards if he is so against dangerous

> play? I'd hope so and he'd certainly go up in my

> estimation if he did.


And you, and everybody else who has reacted like you to this whole sorry situation, will rise hugely in my estimation if you all react in the same way that you have to Ramseys broken leg.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remember some broken legs when I played. Just

> the sound of it was sickening.

>

> Jailed For Dodgy Tackle



Oh Man - me too. Was running line once when a lad's leg went snap - could here it from the other side of the pitch! Ugh!

Nigel de Jong speaks the truth -


""I went for the ball and got the opponent at the end.


"I had no evil intent. If the ball is between me and the opponent, you have to go in full. If you do not then the opponent takes you.


"And if you're scared in a game you get injured yourself."


Wasn't talking about Arsenal, but may as well have been.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nigel de Jong speaks the truth -

>

> ""I went for the ball and got the opponent at the

> end.

>

> "I had no evil intent. If the ball is between me

> and the opponent, you have to go in full. If you

> do not then the opponent takes you.

>

> "And if you're scared in a game you get injured

> yourself."

>

> Wasn't talking about Arsenal, but may as well have

> been.



Enough already, see previous posts. Lets draw a line under this now.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds like Atila. He's always got the hump.



OOOhhh comic genius at work, a one liner Groucho Marx would be proud of, but then as a spuds or Pompey fan you need a good sense of humour, especially as Pompey will me playing in the dizzying heights of the Championship next season. Now thats funny.

Now

The Arsenal Ladies

check them out


UEFA Women's Champions League

2006?07

FA Women's Premier League National Division: 11 (record)

1992?93, 1994?95, 1996?97, 2000?01, 2001?02, 2003?04, 2004?05, 2005?06, 2006?07, 2007?08, 2008?09

FA Women's Cup: 10 (record)

1992?93, 1994?95, 1997?98, 1998?99, 2000?01, 2003?04, 2005?06, 2006?07, 2007?08, 2008?09

FA Women's Premier League Cup: 10 (record)

1991?92, 1992?93, 1993?94, 1997?98, 1998?99, 1999?2000, 2000?01, 2004?05, 2006?07, 2008?09

FA Women's Community Shield: : 5 (record)

2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2008

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As if any Pompey fans give a toss about being

> relegated. It's part of the journey. Not

> interested in being a glory hunter prem fan, but

> at least we won something recently ;)


I presume you'll take a passing interest in tomorrow's proceedings. I'd be gutted if we lose but this game's got banana skin writ large all over it.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atila the hump.


Wow yet another comic colossus on the forum, yet another gem Oscar Wilde would have been proud of. Do you guys sit up at night toiling over your keyboards for inspiraion for these gems, or does being funny just come naturally. I'm flattered by all the attention from you guys. Group hug anyone?

Well done to Pompey - at least they can salvage something now from a disastrous season. Really disappointed in the way we played, particularly in the final third. Absolutely gutted that the goal was not allowed when the ball had clearly crossed the line before James palmed it out. But by then the game was lost anyway. Come on Reading!

If Arsenal win the league it will be ironic given that they have showed they have no idea how to handle Chelsea or Man United. It seems however they handle the other 18 or so lesser teams better - so far at least.


But they have a fragility that showed today in that they could easily have conceded a late goal. So no Arsenal fan would be confident going into any match that they will actually take their chances and put the match to bed before the final whistle. Having said that, a decent striker and they might have been clear at this stage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...