Jump to content

Recommended Posts

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So what if you were there. I saw it on telly and

> the replays highlighted what Gallas was trying to

> do. The debate here is intent. Wenger says that a

> lot of teams are going out with the intent to

> injure his players. He may have a point. But here

> was an example of one of his players intending to

> injure an opponent. I wonder if he gave Gallas a

> bolloking afterwards if he is so against dangerous

> play? I'd hope so and he'd certainly go up in my

> estimation if he did.


And you, and everybody else who has reacted like you to this whole sorry situation, will rise hugely in my estimation if you all react in the same way that you have to Ramseys broken leg.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I remember some broken legs when I played. Just

> the sound of it was sickening.

>

> Jailed For Dodgy Tackle



Oh Man - me too. Was running line once when a lad's leg went snap - could here it from the other side of the pitch! Ugh!

Nigel de Jong speaks the truth -


""I went for the ball and got the opponent at the end.


"I had no evil intent. If the ball is between me and the opponent, you have to go in full. If you do not then the opponent takes you.


"And if you're scared in a game you get injured yourself."


Wasn't talking about Arsenal, but may as well have been.

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nigel de Jong speaks the truth -

>

> ""I went for the ball and got the opponent at the

> end.

>

> "I had no evil intent. If the ball is between me

> and the opponent, you have to go in full. If you

> do not then the opponent takes you.

>

> "And if you're scared in a game you get injured

> yourself."

>

> Wasn't talking about Arsenal, but may as well have

> been.



Enough already, see previous posts. Lets draw a line under this now.

jimmy two times Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sounds like Atila. He's always got the hump.



OOOhhh comic genius at work, a one liner Groucho Marx would be proud of, but then as a spuds or Pompey fan you need a good sense of humour, especially as Pompey will me playing in the dizzying heights of the Championship next season. Now thats funny.

Now

The Arsenal Ladies

check them out


UEFA Women's Champions League

2006?07

FA Women's Premier League National Division: 11 (record)

1992?93, 1994?95, 1996?97, 2000?01, 2001?02, 2003?04, 2004?05, 2005?06, 2006?07, 2007?08, 2008?09

FA Women's Cup: 10 (record)

1992?93, 1994?95, 1997?98, 1998?99, 2000?01, 2003?04, 2005?06, 2006?07, 2007?08, 2008?09

FA Women's Premier League Cup: 10 (record)

1991?92, 1992?93, 1993?94, 1997?98, 1998?99, 1999?2000, 2000?01, 2004?05, 2006?07, 2008?09

FA Women's Community Shield: : 5 (record)

2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2008

ratty Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As if any Pompey fans give a toss about being

> relegated. It's part of the journey. Not

> interested in being a glory hunter prem fan, but

> at least we won something recently ;)


I presume you'll take a passing interest in tomorrow's proceedings. I'd be gutted if we lose but this game's got banana skin writ large all over it.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Atila the hump.


Wow yet another comic colossus on the forum, yet another gem Oscar Wilde would have been proud of. Do you guys sit up at night toiling over your keyboards for inspiraion for these gems, or does being funny just come naturally. I'm flattered by all the attention from you guys. Group hug anyone?

Well done to Pompey - at least they can salvage something now from a disastrous season. Really disappointed in the way we played, particularly in the final third. Absolutely gutted that the goal was not allowed when the ball had clearly crossed the line before James palmed it out. But by then the game was lost anyway. Come on Reading!

If Arsenal win the league it will be ironic given that they have showed they have no idea how to handle Chelsea or Man United. It seems however they handle the other 18 or so lesser teams better - so far at least.


But they have a fragility that showed today in that they could easily have conceded a late goal. So no Arsenal fan would be confident going into any match that they will actually take their chances and put the match to bed before the final whistle. Having said that, a decent striker and they might have been clear at this stage.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...