Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

>

> > Born Wythenshawe so a proper Manc !

>

> That's not what you said here...Places you have

> lived first to last...

>

> If you were born in Badlands, then support your

> local team...Stockport ;-)



Lol !

Seems a strange decision but let's face it he hasn't made a decent decision since signing him. It's going to be interesting to see what happens over the summer at Liverpool. Talk of new owners, possibly a new manager with the personnel changes that brings. Do you think a Europa league win will keep him in his job Matt?

Sharon_H Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well done Brum, Dippers out of the running now

> > (pretty much) Looks like May 5th will be 4th

> place

> > decider ! CTID

>

> Getting a bit fed up with you calling us dippers!

> No need for it.



Apologies but it's football banter- No offence intended

Matt - Torres seemed only half interested while he was on the pitch but I agree that there was no reason to substitute him for a vastly inferior player. Not a great game and a draw probably the right result. As an outsider it sums Liverpool up as a Jeckyl and Hyde team with too many inconsistent performances - they don't look like a coherent team. One of the photos on BBC shows Gerard celebrating his goal and half the team just trooping off back to the kick off.

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sharon_H Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Bluerevolution Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Well done Brum, Dippers out of the running

> now

> > > (pretty much) Looks like May 5th will be 4th

> > place

> > > decider ! CTID

> >

> > Getting a bit fed up with you calling us

> dippers!

> > No need for it.

>

>

> Apologies but it's football banter- No offence

> intended



Edited because I've changed my mind.

Ngog has fantastic movement but physically he is too weak to lead the line by himself. IMO his development would be greatly enhanced by playing alongside Torres rather than always as his replacement (he ain't going to learn much from the less than nimble footed Kuyt!). It may also benefit Torres having someone else up top to drag the opposition around to create space.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Call that an apology?

>

> I thought he meant by "apologies but its football

> banter" = "so don't worry your pretty little head

> about it sharon."

>

> I'd have told him to bog off. :)

That's just stirring !

Matt - I agree that N'Gog would improve playing alongside somebody but not sure if Torres is the right player for somebody like him to play alongside - I don't see Torres as being that 'sharing'. Also I think that Kuyt is one of the players who appear to give a f*ck about the team but is used to fit round other players than use his abilities.

Watching that West Ham goal again on MOTD I hadn't realised how far he'd run from his own half before delivering that cross for the striker to make it 2-2. Perhaps a goal of the season contender.


Kuyt certainly has the right attitude but as a footballer he has done very well to make a career at the top level.

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Call that an apology?

> >

> > I thought he meant by "apologies but its

> football

> > banter" = "so don't worry your pretty little

> head

> > about it sharon."

> >

> > I'd have told him to bog off. :)

> That's just stirring !


I know, i know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Maybe if you indicated what you were reviewing, pub, gastro pub, high-end gourmet, local Italian etc. - whatever classifications you wanted, then you need only indicate that your stars referred to overall quality in that category. So it it's pub grub then 5 stars means it's great pub grub, but not the same experience as 5 stars in a high end gourmet category. Your star system could then include implicitly value for money as well. 
    • Does OP know they can sell everything but alcohol even without a license?😄
    • Thanks, it's a real dilemma whether to do star ratings. A few people have asked me to do them but I've tried to resist as they are too reductive - people will look at them and won't read review! and they are difficult too - my last review of Victoria Inn, i'd give it five stars for value for money - how can you knock two courses for £18? – but 2 stars for quality - edible but nothing special. Which I guess is why some sites give star ratings for different things...
    • ok - Jeremy himself is against mandatory vaccines. Is he as extreme as his brother? No? Is it fair to discuss how the overall view of that family would inform Jeremy's response to the pandemic? I would argue very much so    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...