Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bluerevolution

Bluerevolution

Posted
Posted

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

>

> > Born Wythenshawe so a proper Manc !

>

> That's not what you said here...Places you have

> lived first to last...

>

> If you were born in Badlands, then support your

> local team...Stockport ;-)



Lol !

Sandperson

Sandperson

Posted
Posted
Seems a strange decision but let's face it he hasn't made a decent decision since signing him. It's going to be interesting to see what happens over the summer at Liverpool. Talk of new owners, possibly a new manager with the personnel changes that brings. Do you think a Europa league win will keep him in his job Matt?
Bluerevolution

Bluerevolution

Posted
Posted

Sharon_H Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bluerevolution Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Well done Brum, Dippers out of the running now

> > (pretty much) Looks like May 5th will be 4th

> place

> > decider ! CTID

>

> Getting a bit fed up with you calling us dippers!

> No need for it.



Apologies but it's football banter- No offence intended

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted
Matt - Torres seemed only half interested while he was on the pitch but I agree that there was no reason to substitute him for a vastly inferior player. Not a great game and a draw probably the right result. As an outsider it sums Liverpool up as a Jeckyl and Hyde team with too many inconsistent performances - they don't look like a coherent team. One of the photos on BBC shows Gerard celebrating his goal and half the team just trooping off back to the kick off.
Sharon_H

Sharon_H

Posted
Posted

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sharon_H Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Bluerevolution Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Well done Brum, Dippers out of the running

> now

> > > (pretty much) Looks like May 5th will be 4th

> > place

> > > decider ! CTID

> >

> > Getting a bit fed up with you calling us

> dippers!

> > No need for it.

>

>

> Apologies but it's football banter- No offence

> intended



Edited because I've changed my mind.

matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted
Ngog has fantastic movement but physically he is too weak to lead the line by himself. IMO his development would be greatly enhanced by playing alongside Torres rather than always as his replacement (he ain't going to learn much from the less than nimble footed Kuyt!). It may also benefit Torres having someone else up top to drag the opposition around to create space.
Bluerevolution

Bluerevolution

Posted
Posted

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Call that an apology?

>

> I thought he meant by "apologies but its football

> banter" = "so don't worry your pretty little head

> about it sharon."

>

> I'd have told him to bog off. :)

That's just stirring !

kpc

kpc

Posted
Posted
Matt - I agree that N'Gog would improve playing alongside somebody but not sure if Torres is the right player for somebody like him to play alongside - I don't see Torres as being that 'sharing'. Also I think that Kuyt is one of the players who appear to give a f*ck about the team but is used to fit round other players than use his abilities.
matthew123

matthew123

Posted
Posted

Watching that West Ham goal again on MOTD I hadn't realised how far he'd run from his own half before delivering that cross for the striker to make it 2-2. Perhaps a goal of the season contender.


Kuyt certainly has the right attitude but as a footballer he has done very well to make a career at the top level.

Mick Mac

Mick Mac

Posted
Posted

Bluerevolution Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mick Mac Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Call that an apology?

> >

> > I thought he meant by "apologies but its

> football

> > banter" = "so don't worry your pretty little

> head

> > about it sharon."

> >

> > I'd have told him to bog off. :)

> That's just stirring !


I know, i know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Blah Blah
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Jules-and-Boo
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Jules-and-Boo · Posted

      Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • snowy
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By snowy · Posted

      That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...