Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well what do you want Keef? Presumably you'd like

> to win something.Would you care what happened in

> the dressing room if your team won the league and

> played good football?



OOOOH DECLAN.


MEAOWWWWW....

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef has always struck me as an honest

> commentator, sometimes right, sometimes wrong, and

> I have to say that on this occasion I totally

> agree with his accurate assessment of Ferguson.


Ha, ha.


City out, Chelsea out and looking like Liverpool out. And I was worried that Scunny scored two against us.

I can't believe people would say Woy out at this stage though.


I don't think any realistic Liverpool fan was / is expecting to win anything this season. Woy needs to make it his team, and basically keep them afloat until the ownership is sorted (and hopefully not an American).


I imagine poor Woy may find himself out of a job pretty quickly once a new owner does come in, and decides to put in a big fashionable name.

I would not say Roy out. But I would say Roy's appointment was a poor decision from the start. Now you have him, you have to stick with him.


Its not about fashion, its about who can take on such a big club and he's a journeyman manager.


Its a very sad decline of a once formidable club to be honest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...