Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Narnia Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well what do you want Keef? Presumably you'd like

> to win something.Would you care what happened in

> the dressing room if your team won the league and

> played good football?



OOOOH DECLAN.


MEAOWWWWW....

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Keef has always struck me as an honest

> commentator, sometimes right, sometimes wrong, and

> I have to say that on this occasion I totally

> agree with his accurate assessment of Ferguson.


Ha, ha.


City out, Chelsea out and looking like Liverpool out. And I was worried that Scunny scored two against us.

I can't believe people would say Woy out at this stage though.


I don't think any realistic Liverpool fan was / is expecting to win anything this season. Woy needs to make it his team, and basically keep them afloat until the ownership is sorted (and hopefully not an American).


I imagine poor Woy may find himself out of a job pretty quickly once a new owner does come in, and decides to put in a big fashionable name.

I would not say Roy out. But I would say Roy's appointment was a poor decision from the start. Now you have him, you have to stick with him.


Its not about fashion, its about who can take on such a big club and he's a journeyman manager.


Its a very sad decline of a once formidable club to be honest.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Definitely not a charity, but a for-profit community interest company (CIC).  https://www.londoncentric.media/p/we-r-blighty-fundraising-regulator-criticism-broke-rules
    • Yes I saw that. I'm not intending to give them money! I just wonder why, if they are actually collecting money under false pretences (rather than not having gone through the proper channels) they have not been prosecuted?
    • From the Fundraising regulator link: "we concluded that it was more likely than not that donors could have been misled by confusing messaging or fundraising materials. This includes materials suggesting a link with a well-known national veterans’ charity, which the CIC has since confirmed it does not work with. We were also concerned about the costings in some of the fundraising materials that the CIC could not show good enough evidence for. There was also enough information available for us to conclude on balance that some fundraisers for the CIC acted in an aggressive and unprofessional way towards both potential donors and public officials."   Some of the money may make it to the people they say but there are better ways to support veterans 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...