Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So they parked the bus. It worked though and they're still above you. That's why you've got the hump isn't it. Get over it. I think it's Man Utd's title to lose now. For a side that hasn't played good yet they're still top and can only get better going into the second half of the season. Arsenal aren't consistent enough, Chelsea's age looks like it has caught up with them and I think it may be a season too early for Man City but they'll certainly qualify for the Champions League this year. League Cup for Arsenal.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha. I like that Anna. Atila, your self confessed

> jibes just bore me and others. If you think

> pointing out that Rooney isn't on form or he likes

> shagging prostitutes is news you are a bit

> deluded.



Of course its not news, (give me strength) but indictaive of the personna at your beloved club.

Arsenal were unlucky last night to be honest. The way they came at us from KO sent shudders through the team, we simply weren't ready for a full on attack like that. It was obvious Arse were out for the win so we killed the ball and took the impetus out of the game-not pretty football but did the job. We were lucky to have such a wonderful cross bar to help us out. I don't know what's going on with Tevez, the amount of fluffs over the last 2 games is remarkable. Once we get Silva and Balotelli fit (plus the addition of Dzeko) City are going to be a formidable force. Yes it is a season too early for the Premiership, top 4 and we'll be happy. We may be second but points are tight and all other teams near us have games in hand.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > All far too easy to wind up, and its always the

> > same people.

>

> And same boring @#$%& doing the winding up.



I rest my case

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and put

> your money where your mouth is?


No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on Champs League next year. ;-)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> they're still above you.


And we are above you, and have been for a long long long long time. As for Anna's YAWN Sandperson, I'm glad to see she explained what it meant. Still care to comment or has that made your comment that she sided with you look a tad daft?

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and put

> > your money where your mouth is?

>

> No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your

> ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on

> Champs League next year. ;-)



Thought as much. All mouth and no trousers. No sour grapes here. The season isn't over yet. Got nothing to be sour about. We're doing quite well so far. Do you want to take the bet or haven't you got the balls? We've both won nothing so far this season but I've ?50 says you won't win the league. If you're so confident of winning it take the bet.

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So EC, can you answer Narnia's question then?

>

>

> The Arsenal of course, what a silly question.


You still haven't answered why.

City played exactly as they did against home at Man Utd, no ambition. It is awful to watch, especially when they have a side good enough to have a go against Arsenal, who have lost at home to West Brom and Newcastle. Arsenal deserved to win and a shame they didn't.


The thing is City don't actually care about winning the league, all that matters is that they qualify for the champions league and then they can attract yet more players next season. Success is qualification, anything above fourth they just see as a bonus.


With Utd playing fairly poorly and Arsenal probably likely to lose points unexpectedly or wilt a little in the run in, City, with their experienced players, probably have a good shot at winning the league. It will be interesting to see if they really go for the title when they think a champions league spot is secure, doubt it though.


Having said all that Arsenal have the easiest run in by a long, long way, could be a good time to put a bet on them.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> City played exactly as they did against home at

> Man Utd, no ambition. It is awful to watch,

> especially when they have a side good enough to

> have a go against Arsenal, who have lost at home

> to West Brom and Newcastle. Arsenal deserved to

> win and a shame they didn't.

>

> The thing is City don't actually care about

> winning the league, all that matters is that they

> qualify for the champions league and then they can

> attract yet more players next season. Success is

> qualification, anything above fourth they just see

> as a bonus.

>

> With Utd playing fairly poorly and Arsenal

> probably likely to lose points unexpectedly or

> wilt a little in the run in, City, with their

> experienced players probably have a good shot and

> winning the league. It will be interesting to see

> if they really go for the title if when they think

> a champions league spot is secure, doubt it

> though.

>

> Having said all that Arsenal have the easiest run

> in by a long, long way, could be a good time to

> put a bet on them.



Our biggest mistake last night was playing Jo, he's bloody useless and didn't seem to know where he should be playing. Why Mancini a)plays him b) keeps him is beyond me and my fellow Blues

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I show (Man) City the same level of respect I show

> Chelsea, just can't take them seriously.



A lot of long time City fans will understand where you're coming from. We have always classed ourselves as "The Peoples Club". The money we have spent/ are spending does leave a bad taste in the backs of a lot of supporters throats.

Especially when you think about how much we spent on the likes of Robinho and Jo- they weren't worth tuppence

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm, I thought it was a clever play on words. I

> didn't think she was 'siding' with me, in fact,

> with our history I doubt she ever would. How old

> are you?


Grow up sad man, look at your original post again. Yet again you've biten. Same old Manc.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and

> put

> > > your money where your mouth is?

> >

> > No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your

> > ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on

> > Champs League next year. ;-)

>

>

> Thought as much. All mouth and no trousers. No

> sour grapes here. The season isn't over yet. Got

> nothing to be sour about. We're doing quite well

> so far. Do you want to take the bet or haven't you

> got the balls? We've both won nothing so far this

> season but I've ?50 says you won't win the league.

> If you're so confident of winning it take the bet.


I wouldn't to do you out of your beer money. No lack of balls here spud boy just have no interest in entering into a transaction with a spud. Clear enough?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...