Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So they parked the bus. It worked though and they're still above you. That's why you've got the hump isn't it. Get over it. I think it's Man Utd's title to lose now. For a side that hasn't played good yet they're still top and can only get better going into the second half of the season. Arsenal aren't consistent enough, Chelsea's age looks like it has caught up with them and I think it may be a season too early for Man City but they'll certainly qualify for the Champions League this year. League Cup for Arsenal.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha. I like that Anna. Atila, your self confessed

> jibes just bore me and others. If you think

> pointing out that Rooney isn't on form or he likes

> shagging prostitutes is news you are a bit

> deluded.



Of course its not news, (give me strength) but indictaive of the personna at your beloved club.

Arsenal were unlucky last night to be honest. The way they came at us from KO sent shudders through the team, we simply weren't ready for a full on attack like that. It was obvious Arse were out for the win so we killed the ball and took the impetus out of the game-not pretty football but did the job. We were lucky to have such a wonderful cross bar to help us out. I don't know what's going on with Tevez, the amount of fluffs over the last 2 games is remarkable. Once we get Silva and Balotelli fit (plus the addition of Dzeko) City are going to be a formidable force. Yes it is a season too early for the Premiership, top 4 and we'll be happy. We may be second but points are tight and all other teams near us have games in hand.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > All far too easy to wind up, and its always the

> > same people.

>

> And same boring @#$%& doing the winding up.



I rest my case

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and put

> your money where your mouth is?


No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on Champs League next year. ;-)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> they're still above you.


And we are above you, and have been for a long long long long time. As for Anna's YAWN Sandperson, I'm glad to see she explained what it meant. Still care to comment or has that made your comment that she sided with you look a tad daft?

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and put

> > your money where your mouth is?

>

> No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your

> ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on

> Champs League next year. ;-)



Thought as much. All mouth and no trousers. No sour grapes here. The season isn't over yet. Got nothing to be sour about. We're doing quite well so far. Do you want to take the bet or haven't you got the balls? We've both won nothing so far this season but I've ?50 says you won't win the league. If you're so confident of winning it take the bet.

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So EC, can you answer Narnia's question then?

>

>

> The Arsenal of course, what a silly question.


You still haven't answered why.

City played exactly as they did against home at Man Utd, no ambition. It is awful to watch, especially when they have a side good enough to have a go against Arsenal, who have lost at home to West Brom and Newcastle. Arsenal deserved to win and a shame they didn't.


The thing is City don't actually care about winning the league, all that matters is that they qualify for the champions league and then they can attract yet more players next season. Success is qualification, anything above fourth they just see as a bonus.


With Utd playing fairly poorly and Arsenal probably likely to lose points unexpectedly or wilt a little in the run in, City, with their experienced players, probably have a good shot at winning the league. It will be interesting to see if they really go for the title when they think a champions league spot is secure, doubt it though.


Having said all that Arsenal have the easiest run in by a long, long way, could be a good time to put a bet on them.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> City played exactly as they did against home at

> Man Utd, no ambition. It is awful to watch,

> especially when they have a side good enough to

> have a go against Arsenal, who have lost at home

> to West Brom and Newcastle. Arsenal deserved to

> win and a shame they didn't.

>

> The thing is City don't actually care about

> winning the league, all that matters is that they

> qualify for the champions league and then they can

> attract yet more players next season. Success is

> qualification, anything above fourth they just see

> as a bonus.

>

> With Utd playing fairly poorly and Arsenal

> probably likely to lose points unexpectedly or

> wilt a little in the run in, City, with their

> experienced players probably have a good shot and

> winning the league. It will be interesting to see

> if they really go for the title if when they think

> a champions league spot is secure, doubt it

> though.

>

> Having said all that Arsenal have the easiest run

> in by a long, long way, could be a good time to

> put a bet on them.



Our biggest mistake last night was playing Jo, he's bloody useless and didn't seem to know where he should be playing. Why Mancini a)plays him b) keeps him is beyond me and my fellow Blues

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I show (Man) City the same level of respect I show

> Chelsea, just can't take them seriously.



A lot of long time City fans will understand where you're coming from. We have always classed ourselves as "The Peoples Club". The money we have spent/ are spending does leave a bad taste in the backs of a lot of supporters throats.

Especially when you think about how much we spent on the likes of Robinho and Jo- they weren't worth tuppence

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm, I thought it was a clever play on words. I

> didn't think she was 'siding' with me, in fact,

> with our history I doubt she ever would. How old

> are you?


Grow up sad man, look at your original post again. Yet again you've biten. Same old Manc.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and

> put

> > > your money where your mouth is?

> >

> > No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your

> > ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on

> > Champs League next year. ;-)

>

>

> Thought as much. All mouth and no trousers. No

> sour grapes here. The season isn't over yet. Got

> nothing to be sour about. We're doing quite well

> so far. Do you want to take the bet or haven't you

> got the balls? We've both won nothing so far this

> season but I've ?50 says you won't win the league.

> If you're so confident of winning it take the bet.


I wouldn't to do you out of your beer money. No lack of balls here spud boy just have no interest in entering into a transaction with a spud. Clear enough?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...