Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So they parked the bus. It worked though and they're still above you. That's why you've got the hump isn't it. Get over it. I think it's Man Utd's title to lose now. For a side that hasn't played good yet they're still top and can only get better going into the second half of the season. Arsenal aren't consistent enough, Chelsea's age looks like it has caught up with them and I think it may be a season too early for Man City but they'll certainly qualify for the Champions League this year. League Cup for Arsenal.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Haha. I like that Anna. Atila, your self confessed

> jibes just bore me and others. If you think

> pointing out that Rooney isn't on form or he likes

> shagging prostitutes is news you are a bit

> deluded.



Of course its not news, (give me strength) but indictaive of the personna at your beloved club.

Arsenal were unlucky last night to be honest. The way they came at us from KO sent shudders through the team, we simply weren't ready for a full on attack like that. It was obvious Arse were out for the win so we killed the ball and took the impetus out of the game-not pretty football but did the job. We were lucky to have such a wonderful cross bar to help us out. I don't know what's going on with Tevez, the amount of fluffs over the last 2 games is remarkable. Once we get Silva and Balotelli fit (plus the addition of Dzeko) City are going to be a formidable force. Yes it is a season too early for the Premiership, top 4 and we'll be happy. We may be second but points are tight and all other teams near us have games in hand.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > All far too easy to wind up, and its always the

> > same people.

>

> And same boring @#$%& doing the winding up.



I rest my case

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and put

> your money where your mouth is?


No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on Champs League next year. ;-)

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> they're still above you.


And we are above you, and have been for a long long long long time. As for Anna's YAWN Sandperson, I'm glad to see she explained what it meant. Still care to comment or has that made your comment that she sided with you look a tad daft?

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and put

> > your money where your mouth is?

>

> No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your

> ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on

> Champs League next year. ;-)



Thought as much. All mouth and no trousers. No sour grapes here. The season isn't over yet. Got nothing to be sour about. We're doing quite well so far. Do you want to take the bet or haven't you got the balls? We've both won nothing so far this season but I've ?50 says you won't win the league. If you're so confident of winning it take the bet.

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > So EC, can you answer Narnia's question then?

>

>

> The Arsenal of course, what a silly question.


You still haven't answered why.

City played exactly as they did against home at Man Utd, no ambition. It is awful to watch, especially when they have a side good enough to have a go against Arsenal, who have lost at home to West Brom and Newcastle. Arsenal deserved to win and a shame they didn't.


The thing is City don't actually care about winning the league, all that matters is that they qualify for the champions league and then they can attract yet more players next season. Success is qualification, anything above fourth they just see as a bonus.


With Utd playing fairly poorly and Arsenal probably likely to lose points unexpectedly or wilt a little in the run in, City, with their experienced players, probably have a good shot at winning the league. It will be interesting to see if they really go for the title when they think a champions league spot is secure, doubt it though.


Having said all that Arsenal have the easiest run in by a long, long way, could be a good time to put a bet on them.

murphy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> City played exactly as they did against home at

> Man Utd, no ambition. It is awful to watch,

> especially when they have a side good enough to

> have a go against Arsenal, who have lost at home

> to West Brom and Newcastle. Arsenal deserved to

> win and a shame they didn't.

>

> The thing is City don't actually care about

> winning the league, all that matters is that they

> qualify for the champions league and then they can

> attract yet more players next season. Success is

> qualification, anything above fourth they just see

> as a bonus.

>

> With Utd playing fairly poorly and Arsenal

> probably likely to lose points unexpectedly or

> wilt a little in the run in, City, with their

> experienced players probably have a good shot and

> winning the league. It will be interesting to see

> if they really go for the title if when they think

> a champions league spot is secure, doubt it

> though.

>

> Having said all that Arsenal have the easiest run

> in by a long, long way, could be a good time to

> put a bet on them.



Our biggest mistake last night was playing Jo, he's bloody useless and didn't seem to know where he should be playing. Why Mancini a)plays him b) keeps him is beyond me and my fellow Blues

Atticus Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I show (Man) City the same level of respect I show

> Chelsea, just can't take them seriously.



A lot of long time City fans will understand where you're coming from. We have always classed ourselves as "The Peoples Club". The money we have spent/ are spending does leave a bad taste in the backs of a lot of supporters throats.

Especially when you think about how much we spent on the likes of Robinho and Jo- they weren't worth tuppence

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Erm, I thought it was a clever play on words. I

> didn't think she was 'siding' with me, in fact,

> with our history I doubt she ever would. How old

> are you?


Grow up sad man, look at your original post again. Yet again you've biten. Same old Manc.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jah Lush Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > I've got ?50 says they won't. Wanna bet and

> put

> > > your money where your mouth is?

> >

> > No sour grapes from a spurs fan then. Keep your

> > ?50 to drown your sorrows when you miss out on

> > Champs League next year. ;-)

>

>

> Thought as much. All mouth and no trousers. No

> sour grapes here. The season isn't over yet. Got

> nothing to be sour about. We're doing quite well

> so far. Do you want to take the bet or haven't you

> got the balls? We've both won nothing so far this

> season but I've ?50 says you won't win the league.

> If you're so confident of winning it take the bet.


I wouldn't to do you out of your beer money. No lack of balls here spud boy just have no interest in entering into a transaction with a spud. Clear enough?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Good luck with this - there have been several requests over the years by students needing to do infant observations.  I was lucky when I did mine  - way back in 1994 at a local nursery. Have you tried contacting the NCT to see if there are any local groups who would be willing to participate? As a mother of 2 - found the observation very informative - mine was a 2 year old child as my course stated a child under 3. Got my highest grade for this project so was very happy.
    • Happy birthday! I've just read a bunch of your reviews and really enjoyed it. You write Interestingly without being too ornate, and you manage to give a really good insight into the "vibe" of a place as well as the food. Totally agree with your review of Rocca - it's simple, great food in a friendly atmosphere at a completely reasonable price, esp considering the location.
    • Hello,  I am a 52-year old mother and an integrative counsellor who lives and works in West Dulwich, SE21. In mid January I am starting a new training in Parent Infant Psychotherapy (helping parents to bond with their babies), and a key component of the course is a 24-month infant observation.  I’m looking for someone who will be giving birth ideally in January or February and who would allow me to observe their baby for one hour a week until the baby’s second birthday. The baby can be awake or asleep, playing, feeding, eating or interacting with carer/s and family members - whatever they normally do at that time.  The purpose of the observation is to enable me to gain a thorough knowledge of very early infant development and to develop the capacity to maintain an observationally minded and non-judgemental attitude in my work as an infant-parent psychotherapist.  I will provide enhanced DBS clearance and I’m happy to answer any questions.  Please forward this email to anyone who might be interested, email me at [email protected] or call me on 07949716043. I would be extremely grateful for any leads. Many thanks,  Millie  Millie Burton, MBACP Integrative Counsellor [email protected] millieburton.com
    • I keep my promises...had the Sweet & Sour Chicken.  It was great - the best sweet and sour dish I've ever had. The chicken itself was good and the sauce seemed home made with real vegetables and pineapple - it is NOT the red sugar sauce goo you get elsewhere.  The Korean fried chicken was very good but the sweet chili sauce was much more chili than sweet - just far too spicy for me. There is a honey something sauce that I will get next time. Egg fried veggie rice was good as a side.  We also ordered the chicken katsu curry which was polished off so quickly I didn't get to taste it. It looked very good tho. SD is not like Magic Wok used to be - cheap and filling but junk food. (Don't get me wrong - I went often to Magic Wok). SD's food is much higher quality, real ingredients, chunky portions, freshly prepared. I'll be back, for sure.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...