Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> > Phew. Still unbeaten...

>

> I know...I got a bit worried last night when Man.

> U were 2 down some 70 mins. into the game LOL.

> But we should never lose faith.



Especially when the ref makes a pivotal decision in your favour eh?

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Phew. Still unbeaten (because of bad ref decisions

> *yawn* ;)).

>

> Those are the sort of nights that can trip any

> club up and it looks like United showed some great

> grit and determination and Fergie had the balls to

> take off Rooney. Long may it continue!


Yawn

Emerson Crane Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sandperson Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > All the refs on are the payroll Atila., you

> know

> > that.

>

>

> Double yawn


You been watching Arsenal again Atila?

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Emerson Crane Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sandperson Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > All the refs on are the payroll Atila., you

> > know

> > > that.

> >

> >

> > Double yawn

>

> You been watching Arsenal again Atila?



treble yawn. I think you're hungry because, as usual, you're biting.

pablogrande Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladymuck Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > > come on...just look at that child-like joy

> upon

> > the man's face!

>

> The only thing childlike about Fergie's face is

> that it seems to suffer from nappy rash



You best be careful, you'll the East Dulwich Manc Mafia after you.

Ladymuck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HA HA HA! Nice one Sandperson!

>

> As an aside, has anyone actually any proof that

> Crane-face is Atila?


Just the fact he spouts the same old bile that got him banned twice. And something about his son playing for Dulwich Hamlets that he drops in on occasion.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladymuck Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HA HA HA! Nice one Sandperson!

> >

> > As an aside, has anyone actually any proof that

> > Crane-face is Atila?

>

> Just the fact he spouts the same old bile that got

> him banned twice. And something about his son

> playing for Dulwich Hamlets that he drops in on

> occasion.


No bile from me I think you're far too sensitive and paranoid to the point of being a laughing stock.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Ladymuck Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > HA HA HA! Nice one Sandperson!

> >

> > As an aside, has anyone actually any proof that

> > Crane-face is Atila?

>

> Just the fact he spouts the same old bile that got

> him banned twice. And something about his son

> playing for Dulwich Hamlets that he drops in on

> occasion.



Oh I nearly forgot YAWN four times.

Big game tonight at St Andrews. There's an air of discord at the club at the moment with the fans being critical of McLeish's tactics and player choice, questions over the true ownership of the club in China following a further suspension of the holding company's shares on the HK stock exchange, an almost farcical transfer window with the non-signing of a much needed goal scorer and vice-chairman Peter Pannu hitting back strongly at fans in an email printed verbatim in the 'local' paper. Meanwhile, were just one game from Wembley with just West Ham Olympic and out former owners standing in our way and a good chance that the losing manager will be out of work by the end of the week.


Feel nervous and excited at same time, but it's games like these that make following Blues worthwhile.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A friend has asked me to recommend Juliene for regular cleaning as she has some slots available. Her phone number is 07751426567
    • I'd put short odds on that but who would be his likely successor?
    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...