Jump to content

Football Focus

jenniejenjen10

By jenniejenjen10
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

Annasfield

Annasfield

Posted
Posted

Meh. I understand why he went and don't blame him. I just think the timing was lousy (and Chelsea FFS!!!???)


I don't think he'll play on Sunday. I reckon a deal has been agreed on the quiet. I'm hoping so at least. Stamford Bridge is one of the most unlpeasant aways at the best of times.

????

????

Posted
Posted

yup,absolutely. Baker's show was a hymn to the idiocy of our devotion to our football teams and the world of fandom. 606 since then has largely just been fans with various degrress of madness ranting boringly on about their team and applying d-level punditry skills to their analysis.


Baker's 606 used to have features like Bearded 11s or How have you best got into a match for free - they're just tedious drivel nowadays

SCSB79

SCSB79

Posted
Posted

Annasfield Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> I don't think he'll play on Sunday. I reckon a

> deal has been agreed on the quiet. I'm hoping so

> at least. Stamford Bridge is one of the most

> unlpeasant aways at the best of times.



The chat in the media was that Liverpool asked Chelsea to do this and they refused....

SeanMacGabhann

SeanMacGabhann

Posted
Posted

nervous times for arsenal now but if the sending off was harsh the two penalties fully deserve a Fabregas "who did you pay" type question. Genuinely, properly scandalous decisions. Not to mention the yellow for our keeper


I'm not paranoid normally but these decisions have genuinely perplexed me

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • first mate
      Great news! Peckham Rye station to reclaim its public square by next year!

      By first mate · Posted

      The big difference, other than increasingly flaking paint, seems to be graffiti. The question is, will that/ can it be controlled?
    • alice
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By alice · Posted

      I took back my 🤣 because I think the idea is unworkable expensive and would produce little result.  There seems to be people in the office next to the toilet but I don’t think they leave the office. I’m not sure what they do there.  The toilets have been in a disgusting state for months and months with many promises to repair they are not functional and they invite vandalism. I shall  try to add a couple of photos. The council doesn’t care why should we?
    • first mate
      Nasty kids in Peckham Park

      By first mate · Posted

      There will always be kids pushing the envelope as the saying goes, but having some boundaries should help most understand what they can and cannot do. I think dedicated, daily park wardens is exactly what is required...with a hotline to SNT teams on the beat. Is there no way money made from Gala or from Park parking fees can be diverted to provide that funding? I feel it would be a really good use of money. The principle aim being to maintain the park as a safe and relaxing environment for all. If funding really cannot be found I wonder if there might be funding to at least train volunteer park wardens?
    • OutOfFocus
      Dog Kennel Hill School to change name

      By OutOfFocus · Posted

      Its almost the same as Grove Vale School , now Goose Green School.

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
Ă—
Ă—
  • Create New...